What is it going to take for Trump supporters to come to the realization that their Messiah lies like a rug. How is Trump going to spin this one in a court of law??????
https://fortune.com/2023/06/27/donald-trump-on-tape-highly-classified-papers-indictment-documents/
His base does not care. As long as he and them think they are "owning the Libs", they are perfectly content.
Case in point, the Supreme Court has effectively ended Affirmative Action and DJT is taking a victory lap having handed that victory to them due to his 3 Supreme Court judges being appointed.
They will take the lying and the grifting as a necessary evil of gaining and holding on to power.
They will take the lying and the grifting as a necessary evil of gaining and holding on to power.
[–] Miyagido (2211) a minute agoCase in point, YOU. Clearly, a NON-USofA DJT acolyte advocating for influence in the Court of Public Opinion on behalf of a private citizen (DJT) that you have no vote for.
They will take the lying and the grifting as a necessary evil of gaining and holding on to power.
Projection from the side who are currently trying to imprison their opposition's front runner as a means of holding onto power.Sorry to break the news to you but it is the following:
Everything you accuse others of you are actually guilty of as usual.I'm rubber you're glue defense doesn't even work on the schoolyard. DJT is too busy Crime-ing and Lying to even understand how he is impacting you in such a negative way.
[–] Miyagido (2212) 11 minutes agoYou must not read court filings very well do you?
Projection from the side who are currently trying to imprison their opposition's front runner as a means of holding onto power after gaining said power through lying and grifting.
lol you talk such horseshit. We all know (you included) that Trump is getting railroaded. Please give me another wall of text, shill.
share[–] Miyagido (2214) 20 minutes agoI don't have a train nor a railroad but there is the following that maybe, just maybe DJT should think about how to stay out of trouble.
lol you talk such horseshit. We all know (you included) that Trump is getting railroaded. Please give me another wall of text, shill.
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||____
| STFU Trump |||""'|""\__,_
| _____________ l||__|__|__|)
...|(@)@)"""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)
You're welcome!
Ad Hominem Attack 1: appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect an ad hominem argument
2 : marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
made an ad hominem personal attack on his rival
When did your name become Donald J Trump?
Do you need to make a call or use a Life Line?
Show me where I Ad Hominem attacked YOU?
Did you think you can only make an ad hominem attack directly to the person?
https://media.tenor.com/56Dz3UM4CsgAAAAM/homer-lol.gif
You're not as clever as you think you are apparently!
https://moviechat.org/nm0874339/Donald-Trump/649dcb9f0a07862b4dedc058/Trump-is-playing-his-base-like-a-fiddle?reply=649f2344e9eca2502d5a4ca9
[–] Miyagido (2216) a few seconds agoYes. I do.
Did you think you can only make an ad hominem attack directly to the person?
Yes. I do.
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||____
| STFU Trump |||""'|""\__,_
| _____________ l||__|__|__|)
...|(@)@)"""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)
You're welcome!
The original truck that I used on his post was labeled as "The STFU Truck" and someone else came along and renamed it with "Trump", lol.
Another obsessively deranged idiot suffering from TeeeDeeeSsss.
It's like when the left got so collectively buttblasted by the right calling them snowflakes all the time that they tried to co-opt the term and started calling the right snowflakes at every opportunity in a real world version of the "no u" post. Or any of the countless right wing memes the left tries to co-opt and repurpose by adding a MAGA hat.
Akshually it's you guys who are the snowflakes we are not the snowflakes it is you guys who are the snowflakes
Keyboard warrior!
share[–] Miyagido (2224) 6 hours agoDo you really NOT know what the phrase ad hominem means and how it is used? Are you THAT unaware of who and what you are?
Yes. I do.
Well you're completely wrong! Not for the first time either I'm sure we can agree lol
[–] Miyagido (2224) 2 days agoPreceded by this little Gem.
Look at this pathetic shill and laugh!
[–] Miyagido (2224) 17 days agoPreceded by this little missive.
How long have you guys been using ChatGPT for your shill scripts, comrade?
[–] Miyagido (2224) 18 days agoSo where is it that I have demonstrated an inability to discuss an issue and resorted to attempting to throw low-brow pejoratives around in place of substance?
Oh, look more faggot shilling from the faggot shill NorrinRadicalLeftie. Immediately discarded as partisan gaslighting trash lol
Am I an Avatar, Proxy, or Cut-Out for DJT in your responses to me because CLEARLY I am not Trump yet you posted that ad hominem attack against Trump to me? Are you missing a piece of your brain?I am definitely NOT having a substance debate with DJT and then resorting to name calling him because I can't match like for like.
lol you're such a faggot. That was an ad hominem attack. Joe Biden is a geriatric old smelly faggot. That was also an ad hominem attack. Did I need to direct the attack to Biden himself? No of course not, it just means to attack a person instead of their aguments. Faggot.
shareI am definitely NOT having a substance debate
and then resorting to name calling him because I can't match like for like.
You on the other hand can't help yourself
[–] Miyagido (2235) 2 days agoWow, I am so important to you that you have a single-minded triggered reaction to respond with a pejorative?! You've accomplished your mission. 🤣
You seem to think you are winning some imaginary debate we're having in your head. Let me just set the record straight because you're very confused. I'm not here to debate you, I'm simply here to call you a shill faggot.
I CAN call you names.
You CAN'T provide a shred of evidence of Trump breaking the law!
Thanks for playing, shill!
[–] Miyagido (2308) 36 minutes ago“It is better to be thought a fool than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt” share
I CAN call you names.
You CAN'T provide a shred of evidence of Trump breaking the law!
Thanks for playing, shill!
>attempts to post witty quote
>fails to post any evidence of Trump breaking the law.
lol
[–] Miyagido (2311) 5 minutes agoWhy do you lol at yourself??!! Odd.
>attempts to post witty quote
>fails to post any evidence of Trump breaking the law.
lol
>attempts to post evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law
>fails to post any evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law.
>is stupid enough to confuse accusations with evidence
>is likely a paid shill, Ni Hao!
[–] Miyagido (2314) a few seconds agoNot being part of the citizenry of the USofA it is understandable that you don't know that the charging document contains EVIDENCE that a crime has been committed.
>attempts to post evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law
>fails to post any evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law.
>is stupid enough to confuse accusations with evidence
>is likely a paid shill, Ni Hao!
>still hasn't posted any evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law
>attempts to mock Miyagido
>still hasn't posted any evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law
>is stupid enough to think copy/pasting accusations is the same as posting evidence
>still hasn't posted any evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law
>claims the charging document contains evidence
>still hasn't posted any evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law
>fails to detail what that evidence is
>still hasn't posted any evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law
Massive fail lol
[–] Miyagido (2315) a few seconds agoYou continue to mock yourself Miyagido.
>still hasn't posted any evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law
>attempts to mock Miyagido
"Evidence is any information that supports a conclusion. It can be furnished by witnesses or derived from documents or any other source."
OK if that is your standard for evidence then this statement by NorrinRaddie's daddy is evidence that NorrinRaddie's daddy did not break any laws!
A corrupt sitting president had his top political opponent arrested on fake and fabricated charges of which he and numerous other presidents would be guilty, right in the middle of a presidential election
[–] Miyagido (2318) 29 minutes ago1. Uhhhh, not my standard Cupcake but a definition. It is EVERYONE'S standard.
OK if that is your standard for evidence then this statement by NorrinRaddie's daddy is evidence that NorrinRaddie's daddy did not break any laws!
Hearsay is one of the largest and most complex areas of the law of evidence in common-law jurisdictions. The default rule is that hearsay evidence is inadmissible.
No that's not hearsay, that's an official statement by NorrinRaddie's daddy.
"Evidence is any information that supports a conclusion. It can be furnished by witnesses or derived from documents or any other source"
[–] Miyagido (2322) 8 minutes agoNOPE!! DJT's statement are Hearsay. He needs documents, actions, witnesses that he can produce as corroborating Evidence to validate his Hearsay, ahem, evidence.
No that's not hearsay, that's an official statement by NorrinRaddie's daddy.
You need to brush up on your gaslighting abilities as they are weak af, shill.
No it's not hearsay, he is on the record saying it. That means it's information from any other source that supports a conclusion.
"Evidence is any information that supports a conclusion. It can be furnished by witnesses or derived from documents or any other source"
[–] Miyagido (2332) 3 hours agoI 100% affirm that DJT will NOT make that statement under oath in a Court of Law. Why? He can neither prove nor substantiate his statement.
No it's not hearsay, he is on the record saying it. That means it's information from any other source that supports a conclusion.
"Evidence is any information that supports a conclusion. It can be furnished by witnesses or derived from documents or any other source"
Whoops!
He was suggesting a crime and requesting that his political opponent HRC be hacked by Russia's state sponsored hackers.
It worked
[–] Miyagido (2344) 2 hours agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b71f2eYdTc share
He was suggesting a crime and requesting that his political opponent HRC be hacked by Russia's state sponsored hackers.
It worked
Oh look another post where you failed to provide any evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy breaking the law. lol
Donald Trump has "actively encouraged" foreign powers to hack his presidential rival Hillary Clinton, her camp says.
Hillary: Would you assist me with deleting my emails?
Tech: How many?
Hillary: Not sure but it looks like thousands of them.
Tech: What type of emails?
Hillary: Confidential, Secret, and higher than Top secret, so no big deal.
Can unscheduled records be destroyed without NARA approval?share
In accordance with Federal law (44 U.S.C. Chapter 33), Federal agencies may not destroy or otherwise dispose of records without specific authorization from the Archivist of the United States.
I'm sure NorrinRadicalLeftie is very consistent in calling for justice over politicians and their suspected Crime-Ing! I bet if we scour the post history we will find many many posts of NorrinRadicalLeftie calling out the heinous crimes of HRC! NorrinRadicalLeftie isn't just a partisan shill no way!
NorrinRadicalLeftie (4173) Some time in the past, no lots times in the past I bet!share
Correct, HRC is a massive MASSIVE Loser for breaking laws and will eventually be found guilty.
[–] Miyagido (2332) 3 hours agoHere's your problem.
You need to brush up on your gaslighting abilities as they are weak af, shill.
You don't understand how the law works, you don't understand how Courts work, you don't know what a Search Warrant is, you don't know what a Criminal Indictment is, you don't know how to have a conversation and or an exchange, you don't understand democracy, you don't understand the truth, you don't know what facts are.
[–] Miyagido (2320) an hour agoBeing that you must be from some Banana Republic and neither practicing law nor understanding jurisprudence in the USofA I must give you a pass for not understanding that Waltine Nauta entering a plea of "Not Guilty" is not evidence. 🤣
And this Not Guilty plea by Nauta is evidence that NorrinRaddie's daddy did not break any laws!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/06/trump-valet-walt-nauta-not-guilty-arraignment-mar-a-lago
Whoops!
"Evidence is any information that supports a conclusion. It can be furnished by witnesses or derived from documents or any other source"
Waltine Nauta entering a plea of "Not Guilty" is not evidence
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 793 (e) [Forfeiture of Documents & Fines, 10 yrs Imprisonment or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (k) [can include fines ($250,000) or imprisonment up to 10 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (b) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (2) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (a) [can include fines ($250,000) or imprisonment up to 2 years, or both and forfeiture of property]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (C) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (I) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1519 [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1001 (a) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 5 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1001 (1) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 5 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1001 (a) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1001 (2) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 2 [No offense] Basically, just aiding and abetting.
[–] Miyagido (2332) 3 hours agoOh well, that's cool. You have an opinion. Too bad your "opinion" like DJT's "Hearsay" won't stand in a court of law.
And none of that is evidence either.
Waiting for the evidence shill, tick tock
shareOMG look at all this evidence that the 2020 elections were stolen!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election
[–] Miyagido (2321) an hour agoLawsuits that are thrown out of court, dismissed, deemed as frivolous and or nuisance are NOT evidence nor statements of fact.
OMG look at all this evidence that the 2020 elections were stolen!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_U.S._presidential_election
"Evidence is any information that supports a conclusion. It can be furnished by witnesses or derived from documents or any other source"
[–] Miyagido (2331) 3 hours agoMiyagido, an "Accusation" is not "Evidence". Where did you get that little gem from?
Looks like your words are coming back to haunt you shill!
If the accusation counts as evidence then so does the denial, live with it.
Miyagido, an "Accusation" is not "Evidence". Where did you get that little gem from?
You do realize that DJT was arrested, detained, and arraigned. All of those things are done with "Evidence"
You asked me to produce "Evidence" that DJT committed a crime.
I gave you that evidence
in the form of an excerpt of the Charging Document.
You do realize that DJT was arrested, detained, and arraigned. All of those things are done with "Evidence".
I also gave you an excerpt for each of the statutes that DJT ran afoul of
and the "Evidence" that supports each of those,
along with the charges and the consequences.
Based on the "Evidence" presented in court
Miyagido (2332) 5 hours ago
I CAN call you names.
You CAN'T provide a shred of evidence of Trump breaking the law!
Thanks for playing, shill!
You CAN'T provide a shred of evidence of Trump breaking the law!
that didnt age well.
[–] Miyagido (2332) 3 hours agoEvidence counts as Evidence and an Accusation is NOT Evidence.
Looks like your words are coming back to haunt you shill!
If the accusation counts as evidence then so does the denial, live with it.
Evidence counts as Evidence and an Accusation is NOT Evidence.
NorrinRaddie's attempt at posting evidence of NorrinRaddie's daddy's guilt -
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 793 (e) [Forfeiture of Documents & Fines, 10 yrs Imprisonment or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (k) [can include fines ($250,000) or imprisonment up to 10 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (b) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (2) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (a) [can include fines ($250,000) or imprisonment up to 2 years, or both and forfeiture of property]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (C) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1512 (I) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1519 [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1001 (a) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 5 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1001 (1) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 5 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1001 (a) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 1001 (2) [can include fines or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both]
Penalties for violating 18 USC § 2 [No offense] Basically, just aiding and abetting.
It is okay to admit you don't know the difference between Evidence and Accusation.
Why do you lol at yourself??!! Odd.
just watch the trial knuckelhead
share[–] Miyagido (2944) 10 months agoYou called Miyagido a knucklehead and to watch the trial BUT now we realize that, "Elvis has left the building".
Why do you post misinformation, lies and disinformation? I find that odd.
reply share ignore report
[–] yatzo376 (7463) 10 months ago
just watch the trial knuckelhead
[–] Miyagido (2354) 11 hours agohttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/read-full-text-trump-indictment-pdf-copy-unsealed-documents-case/
I CAN call you names.
You CAN'T provide a shred of evidence of Trump breaking the law!
Thanks for playing, shill!
lol nice try. Just state that you have no evidence and be done with the charade.
share[–] Miyagido (2358) 18 minutes agohttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/read-full-text-trump-indictment-pdf-copy-unsealed-documents-case/ There you go ALL of the "Evidence" presented when DJT was arraigned.
lol nice try. Just state that you have no evidence and be done with the charade.
Still waiting for you to post said evidence. You fail.
share[–] Miyagido (2360) a minute agohttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/read-full-text-trump-indictment-pdf-copy-unsealed-documents-case/ There you go ALL of the "Evidence" presented when DJT was arraigned.
Still waiting for you to post said evidence. You fail.
Yes I know what the accusations are and the accusations have been denied. You do know what a Not Guilty plea means don't you? That means that the status of whether laws were broken have yet to be determined. What you posted is not evidence of laws being broken as that hasn't been determined yet. Massive massive L for you, shill
[–] Miyagido (2362) 4 minutes agoDo you truly understand how the process works in the USofA?
Yes I know what the accusations are and the accusations have been denied.
You do know what a Not Guilty plea means don't you?Yes, DJT standing in a court of law before a judge has to enter a plea. That does not mean that he didn't break the law. It means that he is pleading "Not Gulty". If no laws were broken, he would not have been arrested.
That means that the status of whether laws were broken have yet to be determined.The Laws have been broken it is DJT's Guilt that has to be determined.
What you posted is not evidence of laws being broken as that hasn't been determined yet.Wrong, the "Evidence" of a crime, the crime scene, the criminals named, were all presented to the courts and a Judge.
Massive massive L for you, shillCorrect, DJT is a massive MASSIVE Loser for breaking laws and will eventually be found guilty.
Do you truly understand how the process works in the USofA?
DJT broke the law or a series of laws.
The DOJ collected "Evidence" from various locations of the Laws and Statutes
DJT was served with an Indictment containing that "Evidence" and he had to be surrendered over to a judge.
Yes, DJT standing in a court of law before a judge has to enter a plea. That does not mean that he didn't break the law. It means that he is pleading "Not Gulty". If no laws were broken, he would not have been arrested.
The Laws have been broken it is DJT's Guilt that has to be determined.
Wrong, the "Evidence" of a crime, the crime scene, the criminals named, were all presented to the courts and a Judge.
Correct, DJT is a massive MASSIVE Loser for breaking laws and will eventually be found guilty.
We are not going to be able to deal with a global warming which is a consequential single most consequential threat to humanity if we do don’t do it unless we engage more together not fewer.
shareYeah Bubba. That's some "smoking gun" the OP has LOL.
These bogus charges have only made Donald Trump's poll numbers go up. Have you seen recent polls OP?
Prosecutorial misconduct. Politically motivated charges.
Meanwhile, there is now hard evidence that Hunter and Joe Biden took bribes from China and Burisma. This is far worse and propaganda networks like MSNBC are trying to hide it or spin the narrative.
MAGA
He is playing his base like a fiddle.
So is Biden and the Democrats. You don’t both sides lie for personal gain and growth?
You think the Republicans lie and the Democrats are honest as can be?
Democrats honest? Hell NO!!!! No politician is totally honest. We all have to live with that fact. Having said that, Donald J. Trump has told more untruths and half truths than any other president to date. The man is a habitual liar. He was this way long before he became president. Trump has had numerous personality flaws for as many years as I'm alive and that is a long long time. I don't trust him anymore.
shareThere’s no way of gauging which president told the most lies out of anyone to date. We weren’t around for all forty-six presidents and not everything is documented. People like to pretend that the past was a morally superior time but the truth is there were shenanigans all throughout history and plenty of bad characters have ran our country since the inception.
You can say Trump is a habitual liar and i will concede the fact, that yes, he lies/lied. But to say with certain that he is the most prolific liar to date is not something that can be said with certain.
With the knowledge that every politician lies and will lie we have to choose the candidate who will, NOT as some say be the lesser of two evils, make us prosper the most. Being “evil” is irrelevant because evil is a subjective term. Anything could be considered evil in the eyes of someone. A simple disagreement on an arbitrary matter could make one think the other is evil.
Choosing the candidate who will make its citizens prosper the most is the facts that should be looked at. Fact of the matter is people were more monetarily prosperous under Trump than we are under Biden. Trumps policies of America first and toughness on China were more advantageous to the American Citizen than the policies of Biden.
[–] Mattc164 (618) a year agoNope!!! share
Choosing the candidate who will make its citizens prosper the most is the facts that should be looked at. Fact of the matter is people were more monetarily prosperous under Trump than we are under Biden. Trumps policies of America first and toughness on China were more advantageous to the American Citizen than the policies of Biden.
Dems and the MSM played all of you TDSers for a fiddle for 7 years and continue to do so to this day. Completely programmable minds.
shareMSM shows videos of Trump doing and saying dumb ass things; seriously dumb. Many of those videos are not shown on right wing media sources. Hell, Fox has lied to the American public just like Trump has and they are paying dearly for lying their asses off.
I do watch MSM and only believe what is shown to me in video and audio. Trump is digging his own grave and most of you right wing extremists don't even know it. You don't get to see all the incriminating things Trump says and does. You listen to talking heads who do not present all the information about the bad side of Trump. Live on in your own Trump world. He will have his day in court and he will crash and burn.
Oh yes you are very discerning when it comes to the news as you have demonstrated!
[–] luvthepros (316) 3 months ago
Of course a police officer died as a result of injuries he received on the January 6th insurrection of the Capitol. Read about the people who died, including the police officer.........
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/05/us/politics/jan-6-capitol-deaths.html
Multiple media outlets reported Sicknick's death was due to injuries he sustained, but months later the Washington D.C. medical examiner reported there were no injuries to Sicknick.
After being in the hospital for almost a day, Brian Sicknick died around 9:30 p.m. on January 7, 2021. Earlier that day, he had two strokes. The strokes were due to a basilar artery blood clot, which caused damage to his brainstem and cerebellum.
Are you trying to tell me that officer Sicknick did not get injured during the January a6th insurrection? Really??? The police officer, Sicknick, died the day after the January 6th insurrection from two strokes which he sustained from injuries he received in the January 6th insurrection. This is not a lie so please don't include me when you speak of "programmable minds".
shareAre you trying to tell me that officer Sicknick did not get injured during the January a6th insurrection?
D.C.'s Office of the Chief Medical Examiner said Monday that Sicknick's cause of death was "acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to acute basilar artery thrombosis," and the manner of death was "natural, not a homicide" .
The police officer, Sicknick, died the day after the January 6th resurrection from two strokes which he sustained from injuries he received in the January 6th resurrection
I do watch MSM and only believe what is shown to me in video and audio.
Thanks for pointing out my misspelling of insurrection. Not sure if that was my error or the auto correct that screwed that up.
Are you honestly claiming Officer Sicknick did not sustain injuries at the Capitol insurrection? If you are, you are the one who is not informed.
BTW.....I am ecstatic that I got your goat up. FINALLY, someone is bothered by the truths I am posting.
The following link says "The USCP accepts the findings from the District of Columbia's Office of the Chief Medical Examiner that Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes. This does not change the fact Officer Sicknick died in the line of duty, courageously defending Congress and the Capitol."
https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/press-releases/medical-examiner-finds-uscp-officer-brian-sicknick-died-natural-causes
I am finding out now that Sicknick did not sustain injuries in the confrontation at the capitol. I'm glad to hear he was not injured. I apologize for posting misinformation about that.
FINALLY, someone is bothered by the truths I am posting.
I am finding out now that Sicknick did not sustain injuries in the confrontation at the capitol. I'm glad to hear he was not injured. I apologize for posting misinformation about that.
Brian Sicknick died of natural causes. This does not change the fact Officer Sicknick died in the line of duty, courageously defending Congress and the Capitol
There are plenty of videos that show J6 was no way a "mostly peaceful protest". You are living in a dream world if you thing J6 was not dominated by insurrectionists. Many of those people are serving time in prison.
shareYou can be proud of this statement. You have it in you to be as good as any and I sincerely hope that we all place fact, reason, logic and truth before whatever else there might be. God bless
shareThanks for finally accepting that you were wrong. So rare these days...
shareWow I had no idea. I feel so exposed. So used.
shareHey I think NorrinRad smells and isn't very smart.
share[–] Miyagido (2944) 7 months agoOf course I smell. We all smell. Some smell better or worse than others. 🫢
Hey I think NorrinRad smells and isn't very smart.
Thank God that idiot is long gone...
share[–] SamNoyoun (4226) 6 hours agoI for one wish MAGA cultists like Miyagido were still posting their inanity. Being that he wasn't a citizen of the USofA I had a hard time understanding just why he supported DJT? 🤔 But his postings being aired in a public forum were indeed revealing for just how delusional this global MAGA DJT infestation had become.
Thank God that idiot is long gone...
their Messiah lies like a rug
"Fortune" is just another propaganda outlet. Shocking to me that you are telling us to wake up, when you are the one asleep.
share