MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > If You Were Responsible For Creating a M...

If You Were Responsible For Creating a Monster, Why Would You Keep Talking About It?

posted 2 years ago by HarveyManFredSin (4877)
8 replies | jump to latest

TDS, which is, alas, a VERY real condition, is extremely baffling, because its sufferers (i.e. the Hollywood, media and DNC liberal elite/establishment) are the very people who CREATED Trump.

Trump, the star of such films and TV shows as The Little Rascals, Eddie (featuring Whoopi Goldberg), The Nanny (featuring Fran Drescher), Sex and the City (featuring Cynthia Nixon and Sarah Jessica Parker), Two Weeks Notice (featuring 'liberal'/'anti-media' hero, and prostitute-customer, Hugh Grant) and The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air (featuring pacifist and the ultra-feminist creator of the song Girls Ain't Nothing But Trouble, Will Smith), as well as the host of the *Celebrity* Apprentice, SNL guest host, close friend of Hillary and Bill Clinton (birds of a feather flock together, and all that... 🤔), and cover star of magazines like Vanity Fair, is a MONSTER of their OWN creation, and yet, they keep wanting to remind us of the beast they unleashed on the rest of us.

Weird. If *I* had created such a monster (as a GENUINE liberal, who sticks to ACTUAL principles, I, suffice to say, *haven't*), I think I'd want to SHUT THE FUCK UP, and keep my head down, instead of CONSTANTLY reminding everyone how awful my creation was... 🤷‍♂️ But I'm 'funny' like that (i.e. I *don't* create monsters to begin with, and I possess the rationality, reason, decency and common-sense NOT to bring attention to such things, if I had).

No doubt the USUAL SUSPECTS (i.e. the sanctimonious, AGENDA-driven, TDS-infected, DNC-simps) will attack me for speaking the TRUTH, but I've LONG DESPISED TRUMP, and everything he represented, way before the likes of Bill and Hillary, Spike Lee, Jesse Jackson, and others were chumming up with the former registered Democrat (during the period in which the GOP was waging an ILLEGAL WAR in Iraq...not that it, alas, didn't stop some misguided Democrats from backing that RACIST and IMPERIALIST military establishment-championed endeavour, including the aforementioned Hillary Rodham Clinton, who, lest one forget, was almost rewarded for her hawkish, warmongering politics, and her devout loyalty to the man who RAPED Juanita Broaddrick, and SEXUALLY ABUSED Paula Jones, with a return to the White House, back in 2016...and *before* anyone says it, I personally championed her Presidential bid in 2016 and urged every American I knew to vote Democrat, when it became clear that she was the ONLY thing that could have prevented her BUDDY, Trump, a heinous, wretched man who had NO business being POTUS, from entering the White House).

Because, the TRUTH is, I've ALWAYS despised Trump and the GREED, WEALTH, HUBRIS, ARROGANCE, MATERIALISM and OVER-SEXED sins he represents, as soon as I ever heard about the man (i.e. LONG before he announced his bid for the Presidency.) The DIEFFERENCE is, I've NOT done a full 180, and gone from treating him like a loveable buddy to a FUCKING OBSESSION, like the VERY SAME Hollywood, media and DNC that GAVE HIM HIS FUCKING POWER TO BEGIN WITH. 😠👊🏿 The difference is, if I could ever be accused of 'TDS', it certainly didn't go from 0 to 100, from 16 June 2015 (the date Trump announced his candidacy for the Presidency) onwards. And these days, I'm FAR MORE INTERESTED in exposing the HYPOCRISY of Trump's 80s, 90s and 00s ENABLERS than SHOOTING FISH IN A BARREL (and going after EASY TARGETS like Trump and his dumbass family, or the, thankfully, incompetent and ineffectual dullards at Faux-News). UNLIKE many here, I have the COURAGE, to go after the GENUINELY powerful people; the ones everyone BELIEVES are 'good', but are in fact every bit as wretched as Trump himself. Going after a man everyone already hates, is a sign of COWARDICE and LAZINESS. I went after Trump in the 90s and 00s, when everyone STILL loved him, and I was one of the ONLY ones railing against the shithead. NONE of you listened to me then though, did you? MORE FOOL YOU.

Once again, people, FACTS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NARRATIVE (and the LIES the ESTABLISHMENT want you to believe. Please don't fall for their Jedi Mind Trick BULLSHIT, like certain SIMPS have).

[–] almonigal (1295) 2 years ago

It baffles me how you actually think that there's someone dumb enough to actually read your posts.

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

It doesn't baffle me in the slightest, that some of you will ignore what I say, because heaven forbid you'll have to reckon with the TRUTH.

[–] Narwhale37 (1290) 2 years ago

In the case of the town hall, it's pretty obvious that CNN overplayed their hand and now are going to lose a lot of respect from the people that used to watch it.

Yes you can cover Trump. Just don't give him a free rally and let him get out of Control on your platform.

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

👏🏼

Well said. Good to see someone who has a grasp of what I'm saying, and approaches my OP in a thoughtful and rational manner.

[–] Ranb (11345) 2 years ago

A person might never try to destroy the monster they created? I'm not the kind of person who suffers from collective guilt. I don't identify as GOP or democrat; most of the politicians in the USA suck. So it is baffling to me that anyone else would.

Trump is the star of the shows you listed above? That is bonkers.

Little Rascals, cameo appearance.
Eddie, cameo appearance as himself.
The Nanny, cameo appearance as himself in one episode.
Sex and the City, uncredited cameo appearance in a single episode.
Two Weeks Notice, cameo appearance as himself.

Trump is a studio prop in those productions.

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

Don't take the term 'star' literally. Whether he headlined those aforementioned movies, or simply dropped in for a 30 second cameo, is wholly besides the point. He was invited to appear in them, and other films, like Celebrity (and it pains me to add Woody Allen to the rollcall of entertainment industry hypocrites here, although in that instance, I do think Allen was subversively poking fun at Trump and the type of people he represents), and Zoolander (once again, I'm a fan of Ben Stiller, but the sad reality is, he still buddied around with Trump for that, admittedly enjoyable, film).

Trump also appears in the trailer for Ghosts Can't Do It, which implies he has a larger role in that film, but since the film's star, Bo Derek, is a Republican, I probably can't accuse her of hypocrisy. Still, it PROVES what I've LONG argued: the libera image Hollywood presents is s FACADE, and the industry is fuelled by GREED, and is notorious for its racism towards Black people, and its systemic misogyny. How can an industry that is so 'liberal' be so racist and misogynist, and not to mention the embodiment of capitalism? Oh yeah, duh, cos it ain't *actually* all that liberal, and the Hollywood actors who pretend it is, really are rather THICK.

[–] warrior-poet (1369) 2 years ago

Excellent post. Ignore any idiot responses by people completely missing or refusing to acknowledge your very reality-based point. Many of them are so buried in their delusion that they don't see that Trump has the power he has BECUASE of them, both before and after he ran for president. In his presidential era, they and they alone chose to let his inflammatory fifth-grade level rhetoric get under their skin and seep deep into their psyches. Each of us can choose to give power over how we think and feel to other people or circumstances, a common human frailty. And yet they blame him for a choice they, and they alone, made. It's easy to discern the sheep from the independents, the weak from the strong. Even if on a subliminal level, Trump knows he has that power and wields it adeptly. Many bullies do.

Your post will be akin to a Rorschach test, revealing much about those who reply.
_________________________________________
Never believe. Always question. Rebuke belief, a.k.a. bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason.

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

Thank you.

The only point I disagree with, is how 'adept' Trump wields his power, but he certainly knows how to exploit it, and acquire power by playing on the media's hype, both good and bad. In that sense, he is, alas, more savvy than his enemies.