Rapist


US jurors have once again demonstrated their superior judgement and decided in favour of a woman whose testimony regarding an assault at the hands of '45' is extremely convincing and credible.

Of course, this isn't a criminal trial, and it's notoriously difficult to prove rape beyond all reasonable doubt in most criminal contexts, but on balance it seems *extremely likely* that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll within a department store dressing room area circa mid-1990s.

And whilst I have little doubt that *other* former Presidents have *also* committed acts of sexual violence (e.g. Clinton), it's quite clear that Trump should NEVER be let anywhere near the White House again in view of his history of RAPE. Even if this were the only example of sexual violence he's ever committed (and my suspicion is that it's not; it's possible that it's the only *rape* that Trump has committed, but it's quite clear that 'grab em by the pussy' has committed *other* forms of sexual assault besides this one; also the late Ivana Trump made an accusation of rape during her marriage to Trump which also seems highly credible), that's more than enough to rule out the right for this man to ever stand as a political candidate in any capacity ever again. No American, left-wing or right-wing, Dem or Republican, should want a RAPIST representing their interests, far less representing them as their head-of-state on the world stage. 😠

reply

Hi. I'm a woman with a bad memory. But if I'd been raped while an adult, I'd know the month, the day, and the year. I also would NOT have kept my mouth shut about it.

Some idiot on Twitter said that at the same time Cosby and Weinstein were doing the same thing and no one said a thing about them. They were powerful men in Hollywood. Women in Hollywood often have to make the decision whether they should stand up for their morality or go along to get along. All too often they opt for the latter, choosing career over any sense of right and wrong.

For most of my life, Trump has been considered a JOKE. He was considered a buffoon when this supposedly happened, and people want us to believe that Trump was so powerful she was afraid???

Not buying it.

Plus, why is it defamation of character to say he wouldn't want to rape her? I don't want anyone to want to rape me: http://stiltonsplace.blogspot.com/2023/05/rape-expectations.html

reply

"But if I'd been raped while an adult, I'd know the month, the day, and the year."

I was sexually assaulted by another boy as a child. It was extremely traumatising and upsetting at the time, but I didn't process it as an 'attempted rape,' until I was much older. I roughly know when it happened (sometime in 1991, most likely the Spring/early Summer, a few months before school broke up for the holidays), but I couldn't give you the *exact* date.

Some people repress their trauma for days, weeks, months and even years. Some people feel it's only 'worth' saying something when the individual who abused them is on the world stage and has amassed even more power (and what can be more powerful than being elected POTUS?)

"For most of my life, Trump has been considered a JOKE. He was considered a buffoon when this supposedly happened, and people want us to believe that Trump was so powerful she was afraid???"

Trump WAS powerful, and at the time he was respected and courted by the *Democratic* establishment (i.e. the Clintons). This was also a man who could take a full-page ad in several newspapers that helped convict the Central Park Five a few years earlier. If anything, Trump was *less* of a joke back in the day, because he was still liked by some self-identifying 'liberals'.

And Trump wasn't being complimentary when he said he 'wouldn't want to rape E. Jean Carroll.' I understand what you're saying. Of course no-one wants to hear that someone would want to rape us, but Trump was making that statement in order to body-shame Carroll, the implication that she 'wasn't attractive enough' for him to consider raping her. Firstly, the idea that rape has anything to do with sexual attraction is an offensive myth, and secondly, Trump's insult compounds the trauma that Carroll has already experienced; he's revictimising having not only physically assaulted her, but now deriding her appearance.

reply

Why didn't she say something when he was President? She was part of a move to get the statute of limitations extended to 20 years + one MORE year so she could come out with her accusation now. It's kind of a stretch to think she couldn't have made an accusation before now. But now, it has maximum impact.

Well, at least that's what CNN thought. I doubt they went out of their way to stack that "town hall" audience with Trumpfans. Biden's made a lot of Trumpfans. We're not stupid, and many of us can remember how much thicker our wallets were under Trump.

On Twitter, they're melting down because DeSantis has sat on his thumb for the past few months, and now his time to strike may be past.

Back to E. Jean -- yes, I get that he was saying she wasn't worth raping. I still say it's a bigger defamation of her character for the jury to say she was lying about her rape, and that it was merely some kind of molestation. They're basically saying her accusation is a lie. But the whole thing seems like a crock. A crowded department store and he forces himself on her IN SOME WAY, and yet she doesn't -- feminist that she is -- at least cry out?

PS: I was molested when I was 12. That would be 1967. That's why I said "as an adult." Things get foggy as a child. But I can still nail down the year. She couldn't.

reply

She *did* say something whilst Trump was POTUS:

https://www.thecut.com/2019/06/donald-trump-assault-e-jean-carroll-other-hideous-men.html

And wasn't it a changing room where she was attacked, away from other shoppers? I think you're overestimating how crowded these elite department stores are. And the shock of being attacked is so traumatic that many times a victim of an attack is 'shell-shocked' and goes silent. I hate to bring things back to me, but going by my own experience, I was assaulted on a school playing-field, during recess/lunch-break. No one did anything, assuming they saw what was happening.

And Carroll said it was late 95 or early 96, so whilst she didn't give the precise calendar year, it's pretty clear she was referring to a window of a few months.

Finally, and fwiw, I'm very sorry for your childhood experience.

reply

She didn't sue him. Now she wants to sue him again. I guess she wants to extend her 15 minutes.

Have you ever been in women's changing rooms? They're not that far removed from other shoppers, and there's usually a wait to get in to try something on -- things are that crowded. In all I've been in, there's both the top and bottom open, so any, "Help!" or "Hey! What do you think you're doing???" said with any volume would be heard.

Being molested on an open playground is appalling. When I was growing up, we had teachers who were monitors to make sure stuff like that didn't happen.

Remember that ol' E. Jean was supposedly a "famous feminist" at the time. I'd never heard of her before, but let's assume she thought women were can-do sorts of people who could take the situation into hand. I'm not even a feminist, but I took self-defense courses because there were rapists around the campus. I find it hard to believe that a "famous feminist" would have turned into a submissive little mouse. A scared 12-year-old little girl, yes. A "famous feminist," is more difficult to believe.

reply

He’s always been a despicable pig. There were 12 other women who came forward for the trial.
Watch his deposition again.

reply

Yes, he's always been a despicable pig. But like the jury, I don't believe she was raped. I believe she lied during her testimony. And if she'd lie about one thing, she'd lie about all of it. She just wasn't credible.

But yes, Trump's a pig.

reply

Sure is easy to claim you would report it.

What do you think is wrong with the women that do not? Most rapes are not reported in the USA because victims fear being victimized again. Women report being shamed for getting raped, or lying about the rape and even threatened if they report it.

I have talked to rape victims who describe the experience of reporting rape as nearly as awful as the rape itself.

reply

But she DID report it. So you can't categorize her with the women who were afraid for twenty solid years, plus the one she fought so hard for so she could report it now.

She considers, and others consider it to be a "win," even though the jury said she was a liar when she claimed she was raped. Why they made up another charge to charge him with when her claim was rape is a measure of how much they wanted to "get" Trump. But though they didn't need to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt, but only to the preponderance of the evidence, she STILL couldn't prove she was raped, which was her allegation. She wasn't alleging that he'd molested her. She was insisting she was raped. But she couldn't remember even the YEAR. She claimed it happened in a crowded department store and yet no one heard her cry out or even say "STOP!" in a forceful way. Her chums vouched for her, but my chums would vouch for me, too.

I can see why the jury didn't believe her allegations. That they chose something she didn't say happened proves to me they couldn't believe her, but they did want to get Trump.

And I'm no Trumper. I just know unfair when I see it.

reply

There was at least one big Trump lover on the jury who determined that Carroll's testimony was credible and that Trump sexually abused her.
Do you specifically know that the jury made up the "abuse claim" and that it was not an option they were given as part of their instructions.

reply

Her testimony was that she was raped, not sexually abused. The jury rejected the charge of rape. They didn't find her testimony credible.

Oh, yes -- it was one of the options given. But that was to be used when they couldn't believe her testimony, which was that she was raped. If they thought SOMETHING happened, but not rape as she alleged, then they could go for "sexual abuse." So they had to believe something other than what she was testifying to happened.

I'm told that courts in England and Canada aren't so screwy. If they don't believe that rape occurred, if they couldn't believe her testimony, they find the person in the dock Not Guilty and let them go. They don't come up with a crime that wasn't alleged or testified to.

reply

The so-called victim declared herself a "MASSIVE" fan of Trump's Apprentice back in 2012. Since when do rape victims just love sitting down to watch their rapist on TV? Oh, was that her way of "repressing the trauma"? 😂

https://www.facebook.com/767770175/posts/10151557475215176 (read her replies)

reply

Do you think this is some sort of smoking gun in proving Trump's 'innocence'?

Yes, I suppose Carroll's post here is technically inconsistent with what she experienced, but human-beings are irrational and don't always adhere to explicable behaviour.

It's possible that she was a fan of the show, and had, for the time being, repressed her trauma.

I can empathise. If someone who'd mistreated me several decades ago became the star of a hit TV show, I'm not sure I'd necessarily be drawing attention to their abuse. I'd be trying to move on with my life.

I guess #MeToo encouraged a lot of people to reassess the sexual abuse/trauma they'd experienced. On one hand, I don't know how psychologically healthy that is *for them* (as important as justice is, moving on is often the best approach for survivors *if* it's an option). On the other hand, men like Trump, Weinstein and Cosby *should* be forced to reckon with their heinous actions, however long ago they may have committed them, because it otherwise makes them defiant and potentially allows them to continue committing such abuses.

reply

1. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

2. It would instead prove she was lying.

3. It’s a huge stretch to say that she’s so repressed and irrational that she’d be a fan of the show starring the guy that allegedly raped her. Realistically she wouldn’t have watched the show at all, and would’ve kept conversations about it as minimum as possible.

reply

Don't worry. They're working overtime to keep him out of the election.

reply

Aren't they? Makes me wonder why.

reply