DJT and Those pesky 187 Minutes... during the J6 Insurrection Day. What were you doing DJT? - Donald Trump Discussion

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 3 years ago

I found my first: King Kong run-time is 187 Minutes (2005) 😉

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 3 years ago

Here is another almost PERFECT movie for his mindset:

The Fall of the Roman Empire (1964)
Approved | 188 min | Drama, History, War

6.7 Rate
The death of Marcus Aurelius leads to a succession crisis, in which the deceased emperor's son, Commodus, demonstrates that he is unwilling to let anything undermine his claim to the Roman Empire.

Director: Anthony Mann | Stars: Sophia Loren, Stephen Boyd, Alec Guinness, James Mason

Maybe DJT should have watched this all the way to the end?

reply

[–] immattj (4042) 3 years ago

"Russia, if you're listening. . . ."

LOCK HIM UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

After that Low-Key presidential run announcement, it should be ====

WAKE HIM UP!!! WAKE HIM UP!!!

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

🙌

Too soon?

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

Maybe DJT and Putin were doing a Zoom call? This is one of those X-Files types of mysteries that deserves to be solved.

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) a year ago

Russia is currently begging for ordinance from North Korea.

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) a year ago

As we get close to Insurrection Day soon we will discover what DJT was doing all that time.

reply

[–] Yatzo (2178) 2 years ago

The movie he was watching is called “The J6 Insurrection “
It’s an action packed political thriller!

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

[–] Yatzo (696) an hour ago
The movie he was watching is called “The J6 Insurrection “
It’s an action packed political thriller!

For DJT it was an Unrequited Love Story (Where the Hero doesn't get the girl). 😞
For DJT Supporters it required Sub-Titles and Dubbing.
For some parts of the world it was a Schlock Horror B-Movie that they thought was a prank.
For Russians they thought it was a Reality TV Event with a "Cliff-Hanger". They are still "Staying Tuned" awaiting for the next episode.
For normal Americans it was a Bad, Bad, sad, sad, Horror movie that should not have happened.
For Fox News viewers they thought it was a political Reality TV Divorce. DJT was Fired!!!

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16326) 2 years ago

The Hateful Eight: Extended Version
Genre: Drama, Western | Runtime: 187 Minutes

Possibly some parallels there , all about people fighting for control of the one room : )

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

This next Indictment(s) might look into just ALL those individuals who DJT talked to during that time period. It might very well be the culmination of all of the Fake Elector efforts.

If that is the case, and there are other avenues that DJT went down that will probably bring the crime of Treason into play, DJT will be fighting at least Conspiracy.

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7755) 2 years ago

Everybody's gonna flip

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

[–] yatzo376 (6996) 2 hours ago
Everybody's gonna flip

Prosecutorial-wise I'd rather none "flip" to evade sentences. Hopefully their email or text messages during that time will tell "a" story of what transpired and who was involved.

Rudy Ghoul-iana may have done just that, and that is a travesty by him having been a lynch-pin for most of this DJT chicanery.

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 6 months ago

Josh Hawley wont flip. Gym Jordan wont flip. James Comer? He'll flip.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16326) 2 years ago

Treason would be the correct charge , sadly its just so difficult to prove real intent because Trump , is ... well ... just soo fucking stupid.

His plan to keep control of the Whitehouse , and ergo the country, by just denying reality was never going to work, even though he got his army of braindead to march into that building and rough it up.

Its like trying to prove that a toddler writing on the floor of a supermarket refusing to stop screaming because mummy wont let it have an icecream ... is guilty of attempted shoplifting.

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 5 months ago

[–] moviechatterer (15098) a year ago
His plan to keep control of the Whitehouse , and ergo the country, by just denying reality was never going to work, even though he got his army of braindead to march into that building and rough it up.

From the new court filing by Jack Smith DJT wasn't denying reality. DJT was flaunting his control over a few Congressmen, a few Senators, Supreme Court Justices, but sadly NOT his VP. 🗽😂🤣

DJT was texting and watching Faux News for a portion of those pesky 187 minutes.

reply

[–] Headupyourass (73) 2 years ago

No-one cares except you and other basement dwellers, "NorrinRad". They see the "january 6th riot" as something that happened because you rigged the election results. They don't give a fuck.

What about the 1 million, three-hundred and thirty-thousand, five-hundred and sixty minutes since January 6 that you yourself have spent talking about Trump about his supporters, and thinking about us?

Why didn't you spend that time hanging out with any of the people you previously used to claim were important such as Muslims and trans people who you said Trump was "oppressing"?

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

[–] Headupyourass (57) an hour ago
No-one cares except you

I am thrilled that you see how just ONE person caring can make a difference. 👍

and other basement dwellers, "NorrinRad".

and Attic lurkers, and Spare bedroom renters, and...

They see the "January 6th riot" as something that happened because you rigged the election results. They don't give a fuck.

Hmmm, very interesting perspective you got there. So a "rigged" election caused a group of "Patriots" to create "Fake Electors" and tried to delay the transfer of power by disrupting a government proceeding? I sure hope that works for you in a Court-Of-Law instead of your Court-Of-Public opinion and the Ballot Box.

What about the 1 million, three-hundred and thirty-thousand, five-hundred and sixty minutes since January 6 that you yourself have spent talking about Trump about his supporters, and thinking about us?

You get major nerd points for understanding a Julian calendar and knowing how to multiply. ☑️

Why didn't you spend that time hanging out with any of the people you previously used to claim were important such as Muslims and trans people who you said Trump was "oppressing"?

What does DJT oppressing Muslims and Trans people have to do with his missing 187 minutes during J6? Was he engaging in meaningful legislation for the rights of the oppressed then?

reply

[–] Miyagido (2944) 2 years ago

I am thrilled that you see how just ONE person caring can make a difference

The only difference you make is that the website consistently looks worse after your eyesore posts than before them.

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

[–] Miyagido (2428) a day ago

The only difference you make is that the website consistently looks worse after your eyesore posts than before them.

You paranoid much? BOO!!!!

I will recount the following 10 points for you of Differences:

1. My Vote to Fire DJT made a Difference.
2. You? NO difference in the very elections for the very grifter that you speak so highly of. ☑️
3. You make NO difference because you don't even support your Grifter-In-Chief with your hard-earned Sterlings. ☑️
4. You've never been to a DJT rally, you make NO difference. ☑️
5. You've never bought any DJT memorabilia, paraphernalia or even so much as a T-Shirt. You might not even be on a Trump mailing list. You make NO difference ☑️
6. DJT has never and will never read a single post of yours and doesn't even know you exist or ever existed.
7. You've never gotten a single Us Voter to even consider voting for DJT. Not one! You made NO difference ☑️
8. I don't think you've ever been to the USofA. 🤔
9. You lack conviction and don't even believe 85% of what you type. You just need to rant on the internet because you feel unseen, unheard, and un-believed. Yet you made ZERO difference.
10. You're ineffectual and paranoid. You made NO impact and you made NO difference.

Cheers!

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7755) 2 years ago

Your head is up your dank stinky ass...., where it belongs! LOL!

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16326) 2 years ago

No-one cares except you and other basement dwellers, "NorrinRad". They see the "january 6th riot" as something that happened because you rigged the election results. They don't give a fuck.

Who is the "They" in that little rant?
The police?
The democrats?
The army of Trump morons perpetrating the insurrection?
The senators?

Pretty much everyone on all sides should "give a fuck" what Donald was doing while his minions were tearing up the capital building in his honor.

Arnt you bothered he wasnt cheering them on from the balcony?
and what exactrly do you think he "was* doing?

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

[–] moviechatterer (10099) 3 days ago

Pretty much everyone on all sides should "give a fuck" what Donald was doing while his minions were tearing up the capital building in his honor.

Aren't you bothered he wasn't cheering them on from the balcony?
and what exactly do you think he "was* doing?

Jack Smith and the DOJ cares and caring is sharing. He will caringly share with DJT a very detailed and well worded "Indictment".

reply

[–] Galilguy (2533) 2 years ago

One element of the President's defense strategy should be to file a motion that the indictment and prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the activities on J6 were a true Insurrection. Talking points won't cut it.

When/if they try to prove it this would open the door to all of the evidence of Government collusion, entrapment, evidence tampering and selective prosecution.

If they can't prove it there is no possible crime, case closed. If the judge rules it irrelevant and inadmissible this would trigger an appeal which would end up in the Supreme Court sometime in 2026 or so.

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 2 years ago

[–] Galilguy (1847) 43 minutes ago
One element of the President's defense strategy should be to file a motion that the indictment and prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the activities on J6 were a true Insurrection.

That motion would be dismissed by any and EVERY judge. Now, what you say has merit because that is how the jury system automagically functions. Here is your 1st defense problem. Wait until you see the actual charges and the evidence presented before you craft a defense. 2nd defense problem. Federal prosecutors have a conviction rate of: 99.6%. The Feds only bring cases that they know they will win based on rock solid evidence and never bringing cases that they MIGHT not win.

Talking points won't cut it.

That is a pretty flippant statement because you think this Fed case will be tried in the Court-Of-Public opinion. Not the right venue. This will be held in court with evidence and facts, not opinions. 😎When/if they try to prove it this would open the door to all of the evidence of Government collusion, entrapment, evidence tampering and selective prosecution.The defense will have to present evidence of those to support those positions. Not allegations but actual court cases, filings, precedent(s), etc.

If they can't prove it there is no possible crime, case closed. If the judge rules it irrelevant and inadmissible this would trigger an appeal which would end up in the Supreme Court sometime in 2026 or so.

Think about what you typed. NONE of that makes any sense in a court of law.

Insurrection:

an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government

That sure sounds like J6. A Congressional Hearing covered that. 👍

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) a year ago

[–] Galilguy (1989) 2 months ago
One element of the President's defense strategy should be to file a motion that the indictment and prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the activities on J6 were a true Insurrection. Talking points won't cut it.

Looks like "All the Ex-President's Men" aren't taking your laser focused legal advice as their defense strategy. 🤔

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) a year ago

After DJT's latest interview on MTP he states that he will let the world know what he was doing those 187 minutes.

Yeah, right. 😂

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) a year ago

Is the country closer to Infrastructure Week than Insurrection Day under DJT's tutelage?

reply

[–] moviechatterer (16326) a year ago

What the hell else was it ?
They were storming the capitol building because of the election result.
Thats all the facts you need.

Thats makes it an insurrection.

all you magas calling it a picnic in the park doesent change that
pointing out that there were also BLM riots doesent change that.

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) a year ago

[–] Galilguy (2199) 5 months ago
One element of the President's defense strategy should be to file a motion that the indictment and prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the activities on J6 were a true Insurrection. Talking points won't cut it.

How is that theory of yours coming along?

Meanwhile, we find out more as to what a very angry DJT was doing during those pesky 187 minutes!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jack-smith-has-new-evidence-about-very-angry-trumps-jan-6-actions-report/ar-AA1mAnkM

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 9 months ago

Maybe the J6 trial will be next? You still dropping conspiracy defenses? 🤣

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 5 months ago

[–] Galilguy (2424) a year ago
One element of the President's defense strategy should be to file a motion that the indictment and prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the activities on J6 were a true Insurrection. Talking points won't cut it.

It is September and Special Counsel Jack Smith has submitted 180 pages of evidence to delineate more crimes of DJT. Don't think those are Talking Points and more like Stalking Points. 🗽🤣🗽

reply