Winners focus on winning
While losers focus on winners.
This explains the myriad cases of Trump Derangement Syndrome in Lefty snowflakes and their constant lying drivel. Poor babies, wah, wah.
While losers focus on winners.
This explains the myriad cases of Trump Derangement Syndrome in Lefty snowflakes and their constant lying drivel. Poor babies, wah, wah.
By that logic, Fox News should have never mentioned "Barack Obama" once during his 8 year term.
shareNo, because NObama wasn't winning, he was corrupting America and destroying the heath care system while overseeing a lousy economy. Here are the facts, my friend:
- Blatantly lied when he said "If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor"
- Implemented IRS targeting of conservatives; If there was no IRS scandal, why did Lois Lerner plead the fifth? Innocent people don't plead the fifth.
- The Benghazi fiasco
- The "spontaneous reaction to a video" LIE
- Fast & Furious and Eric Holder’s resignation
- The Bowe Bergdahl farce
- Legally allowing mentally ill men to use the women's restroom via executive order
- The waste of millions of tax-payer dollars with failed green investment of Solyndra
- V.A.
- NSA domestic spying
- The absurd $1.7 billion cash deal with Iran
- The $800 billion non-stimulus and the non-"shovel ready" jobs it created
- Obama's Lawless use of his Deep State minions within the FBI and his secret government wire taps which were used to try and steal the 2016 election
- A Champion for infanticide, signed a bill that would allow babies to die on the table after a botched abortion
I see.
So, when you guys are still focused on Obama (even after he's been out of office for over 2 years), it's fine. But, when liberals focus on Trump (while hes in office), they are deranged. Thank you. lol
I noticed you didn't cite any legitimate corruption; that's because he's focused on fulfilling his campaign promises and making America great!
And, by the way, the Dem-led Mueller investigation cleared him of "Russian collusion," which was a Leftwing hoax.
I was one who always said, "Wait for the facts to come out." I wasn't for or against the collusion.
shareHow much Wu can a Wuchak chak , if a Wuchack could chak Wu?
That’s the $10,000 question.
Congratulations: When someone in a debate turns to juvenile ad hominem tactics it signifies they've lost.
sharedo you realize how often you fire out the ad-homs though?
shareActually, it signifies boredom. You have become dull and predictable, telling the same joke with the same punchline over and over again landing with a loud thud. Please don't fool yourself thinking you post things for 'debate' (that's a mighty big word for you); you don't.
shareActually, a true winner never has to brag about their wins. A true winner is confident in themselves and doesn't care enough to TELL someone that they're winning--they just win and move on.
THAT is what a real winner does.
I wasn't talking about Trump's personal quirks, but rather the glaring achievements of the Trump administration, noted above, accomplished under the constant slanderous attacks of Libs & their media and the Mueller witch hunt, not to mention RINOs. Anyone else would've crumbled under the persecution & pressure. So let's give credit where credit's due.
However, I agree that -- in the past, at least -- Trump has been guilty of bragging, which is definitely unbecoming and a turn-off. I don't know about recently because I haven't heard him; hopefully someone corrected him and he's improving in this area. We'll see.
This explains white White Nationalist Trolls like you just post empty substance-free whiny drivel like this topic CONSTANTLY.
You're such a mentally incompetent child, Wuchak. No wonder you're a racist misogynist, those typically accompany mental deficiency.