"Condescending, abrasive,"-These are not looks
"focusing uncomfortably on young boys"- if you are referring to the pedophile priest scandal (of which Amber Tamblyn has no relationship) then this too is not a 'look'. BTW-According to insurance industry studies young males are statistically in safer hands with a Catholic priest than with the general male population. Catholics are also not being hypocritical since Catholic doctrine does not allow pedophilia and 99.87% of Catholic priests (insurance industry figure) do not engage in pedophilia. Then again since you are comparing the two are you implying that homosexuals are also pedophiles? Yours is a strawman linkage and as such false.
"condemning homosexuals for wanting their mature relationships legitimated"-Besides the poor grammar ('legitimated' should be 'legitimized') this is an opinion not fact since you cannot establish second hand that all homosexual relationships are mature or that all mature relationships are legitimate. Of course one should ask what constitutes a mature relationship. Are you implying that immature relationships aren't legitimate?
I'm sure in that all tolerant mind of yours (except against Catholics) you could envision a relationship that didn't meet your 'legitimated' standard. If you are being intellectually honest then you know you have just as many 'intolerant' views as the next person. After all aren't you a human being with human imperfections or are you a 'quasi-perfect' Atheist.
But thanks for the anti-Catholic bigoted reply.
reply
share