I like Andrew as moriarty, but I think in the second series and last episode of sherlock, Martin Freeman gave a bttr performance than him.
I dont know about the other nominees since I dont live in uk.
This message has been deleted by an administrator
shareactually, that's what am afraid. bafta gave him the award because maybe it's gonna be his last chance to get it in a very popular tv show.
martin's performance in season 2 was superior than scott.
He should get an award for his convincing performance of savy bank card holder in the Bank of America commercials. Wtf is this guy doing commercials after being on this show!
I don't know if I would say Martin Freeman was better. I think all three of them (Martin, Benedict Cumberbatch & Andrew Scott) are simply a joy to watch and a big part of that is how well they play off of each other. So if the question is whether or not Andrew deserved his BAFTA my answer would be yes, absolutely, but I think they all deserve acclaim and awards for their respective performances.
--
'I was very shocked when my son told me his boyfriend was a homosexual.'
Absolutely no way this guy (Scott) should have come near an award. Amateur at best! Hams up every scene and deliveries are woefully weak .
shareIt was a stand out performance though. So well acted. Very much deserved that Bafta.
#RIPCoryMonteith
He deserved it hands down for me...Flawless and original performance!!gives me the chills every single time and every single line! Bravo Mr Scott! I loved his work in "Dead Bodies" as well
shareI just watched Sherlock, as a new viewer.
Oh my god, Andrew Scott is seriously terrible.
His acting had as much menace as Justin Bieber.
I couldn't take him seriously whatsoever.