Post deleted

Not to mention there have been endless investigations into Benghazi which turned up nothing on anyone (funny, aren't they supposed to be "fiscally conservative"? Hmm at least five investigations by various govt. agencies in both the executive and legislative branches, all of which confirmed zero wrongdoing by Obama, Clinton, et. al., hardly amounts to preserving precious tax dollars if you ask me) Add that to the fact the GOP doctored emails to suggest a cover up and clearly we notice easily duped sheeple in this thread.

The first post couldn't have made me laugh harder if it tried...Mark's simply speaking the truth that's even provided in the official Senate report on these lunatic investigations perpetuated by Darrel Issa, a guy known for ridiculous kangaroo court proceedings. To suggest there is a "cover up" or "scandal" is, per Ruffalo's editorializing, BS. Furthermore, the truth is the GOP house slashed the Embassy funding no matter how much people wish to deny that reality...but the biggest kicker? The Ambassador himself denied two additional security requests.

What's also sad is these types don't utter a word about the countless embassy attacks overseen by Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice (11 in 8 years is a far cry from 1 in 4 years...who am I kidding? the GOP's never mastered basic arithmetic *snort*). Some of those onslaughts also had more casualties than Benghazi. Mind you, it all of a sudden becomes a concern when the person tasked to oversee embassies during Benghazi will in the end be the next U.S. President (another factor to their paranoia: very few people rating Mrs. Clinton lowly as a result of the Benghazi obsession. To them, another investigation should nip her insurmountable lead in the bud but alas it's just a pipe dream. Only THEY don't understand)

My advice is just ignore these desperate turds. They're just livid that most Americans have moved on from the non news item that is Benghazi (there's a joke now that Benghazi's defined as "an interjection over the lack of Obama scandals"...very accurate! LMAO). They shall forever contend that Ruffalo's just driven by the "Hollywood liberal machine" when in reality all the guy's doing is buttressing official reports rather than taking his position off the entertainment industry's political edicts. Should one dare provide references that implode their delusions, they'll just regress into utter denial and never face the honest truth. Even two friends of mine who are Republicans scoff at these twats reinventing the wheel that is counterproductive Benghazi oversight.

*steps off the soap box*

On a side note, I'll still watch Eastwood movies myself despite his obviously lame attempt at sideshow humor two years ago. Ruffalo AT LEAST won't proclaim an endorsement under an embarrassing disposition. Last I checked, he never consults with chairs to formulate well thought out views about fracking . And you best believe I NEVER hopped on Eastwood's imdb forum to express my dismay at humiliating himself. Dumbfounded Republicans like him never get me that riled up...if anything, one can only pity their backing a party who wouldn't spit on them if they went ablaze.


When God made Tom Cruise, he was only joking.