Ignorant twit
If it wasn't for JK you wouldn't have a career.
shareWhat display of ignorance did he exhibit ?
shareRefused to invite JK to the 20th anniversary HP movie reunion.
shareYou think it was his choice? She is toxic on social media right now (whether it's justified or not is irrelevant) and there is no way WB wanted her to ruin their project.
shareOh no, JK has an opinion on mentally ill trannies.
shareOne would expect that if he had any balls he would have refused to attend unless JK was invited. Pretty simple, it is called loyalty and he showed none.
share💯
shareActually it was the opposite. He refused to attend if she was there. the producers caved and only used archive footage of Rowling.
shareThe same goes for Emma Watson and Rupert Grint. Stupid woke brats. They would be nobodies if it wasn't for JK Rowling.
shareYeah it is also good to see that Rowling isn't backing down or apologizing to the mob.
shareShe shouldn't have to. She stated her opinion but wasn't hateful about it. Everyone has an opinion about this, and everything. And I do agree with JK.
shareYes but there is a side that gets very aggressive when you don't play along with transgenderism which you can see from the backlash Rowling and others have gotten.
shareThe stupidity of it is these people are enabling a delusion. If a person claimed he was a bird would they push him out a window? If a man said he was a fish would they toss him in a lake? No when a person is delusional you try to help them or at the very least put them somewhere where they can't hurt themselves. These men that think they are women and women that think they are men are delusional.
shareI agree.
shareThey are indeed.
shareHe'd literally have nothing.
shareTHE PHILOSOPHY OF EVERY ABUSIVE SPOUSE AND NARCISSISTIC ASSHOLE.
shareAnd what exactly did Rowling do that was so nasty and unforgivable? Do you have even the slightest clue, Kowalski, or are you every bit the dumb Polock you appear to be?
shareNO CLUE WHAT ROWLING DID OR DID NOT DO...WHICH IS WHY I OFFERED NO OPINION ON HER EXCLUSION FROM WHATEVER...I ONLY COMMENTED ON THE NOTION THAT A PERSON IS BEHOLDEN TO ANOTHER BASED ON DECISIONS,ACTIONS AND EVENTS OF THE PAST AND NOT THE CURRENT CLIMATE BETWEEN THE TWO.
shareYes, Radcliffe completely disrespected her.
He could have said friends can disagree but he didn't. I see no acknowledgment of Rowling's right to hold a different opinion than his.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/krystieyandoli/daniel-radcliffe-jk-rowling-anti-trans-comments
He loved Hom e and Away and Neighbours.
share