More attractive as she gets older
For a 32yr old woman, she looks great, still very attractive.
And her short hair still looks feminine, sexy and chic
I disagree, she's getting a little more bland now.
share
MovieChat Forums > Scarlett Johansson Discussion > More attractive as she gets older
Gotta disagree with that. I used to find her extremely attractive, now not so much. Probably the hair and the weight loss.
Also 32 is young.
Thats how I feel.
Her weight-loss but the baby and the surgery along with the short hair has really done a number on her. She used to be such a beauty. I dont feel so much anymore.
Because she bears a striking resemblance to my ex, the sight of her always brings a particular winsome melancholy. Lovely lass.
share[deleted]
Merci
share32 is young, and she used to look waaay hotter (scoop), now she's kinda used up, not fresh anymore.
shareAnd her short hair still looks feminine, sexy and chic
I still think she is gorgeous but what the hell is she thinking with that hair?
https://i0.wp.com/hollywood-hills.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/hairstyles-age-60-plus-fresh-scarlett-johansson-tyimages-short-hair-pinterest-of-hairstyles-age-60-plus.jpg?fit=1484%2C1484&ssl=1 share
Looks good for her advanced age.
shareShe's attractive but still nothing special, especially when you discount make-up, visual adjustments (camera lens, Photoshop, etc.) and her hair stylist.
And, no, I don't think she's going to age well.
She's one of those actresses that with good stylists and make up team, and who the media tells you is way hotter then she is, is consider one of the hottest women in the world. Beauty of course is the eye of the beholder, but for me she's got a rocking body and cute face if she wasn't famous and hadn't all the best of beauty care in the world. She'd be a solid 7. I would put someone like Jennifer Lawerance, Eva Green, Saoirse Ronan, Sophie Turner, Rachel McAdams, Emilia Clarke in the same boat as Johansson. If they weren't famous and hadn't all the best beauty teams on hand, they wouldn't stand out at all. That's not saying their not attractive.
For me someone like a Margot Robbie and Monica Bellucci would be natural beauties for me. No matter if they weren't famous or not they'd be 10/10 if they were famous or not.
that's an interesting analysis. However id say ScarJo is definatly above those you mentioned, theres something about her look (and maybe her persona) that puts her above the likes of JLaw etc a
but where would say Pamela Anderson (in her Baywatch days) or Sharon stone be in your list..? or the stars of the Golden era like Sophia Loren? I guess theyd be in the 10 Margot Robbie/Monica Belluci category.
On the top of my head, Sophia Loren, Grace Kelly, Jacqueline Bisset, Ann Margret, Ava Gardener, Isabelle Adjani, Catherine Deneuve, Pam Grier, Julie Christie, Nastassja Kinski, Juliette Binoche for me would be in the same category as Robbie/Belluci. I think Kinski for a time in the 80's and early 90's was the sexiest actress that I've ever seen. Stone was attractive during her peak, never got the Pamela Anderson thing if i'm been honest.
I do agree that ScarJo is attractive, but I find it mind boggling when it comes to these sexiest women alive lists that she's always in the top 3. I don't know, it's someone's opinion of cause but I have a dozen women over her as the most beautiful around. I think it's cause she's got that curvy look to her that's pretty rare these days that probably gets her all the love. But for me take away the fancy make up, all the expensive fashions and top notch photographers and I just wouldn't see her turning heads on the street. That's just me.
I get where you coming from. in the weird alien movie she dresses pretty down and blends in (as the role required) and she doesn't look all that but there's something about her ..that 'x' factor she seems to have over the others. the look/attitude etc
If she wasnt famous and working in a supermarket I guess guys would be going in and hitting on her constantly more so than if any of those others you mentioned lol