MovieChat Forums > Adolf Hitler Discussion > Why do democrats admire this guy ? Espe...

Why do democrats admire this guy ? Especially now with what’s goin on in the Middle East


Especially now there’s marches for eradication of Jewish people

reply

If you don't know, well...I guess the media propaganda department run by (((them))) is doing it's job. Or did you learn your "facts" from (((their))) academia approved textbooks based on zero facts. While you're wondering things, maybe wonder why everything you learned in school is utterly useless and untrue.

reply

So you admire Nazis I see

reply

That'd be all you see, NPC. Which is hilarious because in your NPC mind that's an insult.

reply

Npc mind 😂

reply

seems you want jews exterminnated typical radical republican not american talk

reply

It's so hilarious how Democrats have called every Republican President in the last 50 years "literally Hitler" but now what are the Democrats calling for? Yeah... Killing Jews.

reply

Exactly

reply

Supporting Palestine is not a typical position of the Democrats. Most Democrats and Republicans support Israel. Although there are some Democrats that are pro Palestine it is a very small number compared to those that are Zionist.

reply

Bye, Bye, Russian-troll bot.

reply

Russia Russia Russia 😂

reply

The Dems don't admire Hitler.

In fact, it's their low opinion of Hitler which triggers them to use the simple minded metric of:

Hitler bad.
Republicans bad.
Republicans must be Hitler..

It's true that many in the Democrat party support the Hamas terrorists that wants to kill all Jews (and Christians and atheists after that), but that doesn't make the leap to say if they support Hamas it's the same as supporting Hitler.



reply

Hitler bad.
Republicans bad.
Republicans must be Hitler.


This really is the Democrat lemming thought process to a T. It pushes their mental capabilities to the limits.

reply

Supporting Hamas means just outsourcing the holocaust.

reply

[deleted]

both parties are bad because there radicalized

reply

Take a look at this Time Magazine "Person of the Year" edition, 1938:

http://kevinwhiteman.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/timehitlertwitter.jpg

It was one year before Hitler invaded Poland. Before that year, a lot of Democraps were admiring Hitler, including Roosevelt. They fell for the propaganda and thought the Germans were running their country very efficiently. (It should be noted their GDP was high because they had stolen a lot of money from Jews they had thrown into prison or camps already, just like the Bolsheviks did with the nobles in Russia just 30 years earlier).

Dinesh D'Souza's book "The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the American Left," which you can buy here:

https://www.amazon.com/Big-Lie-Exposing-Roots-American/dp/1621573486

It tells a lot of very embarrassing stuff the Left would not really want you to know about how much they admired the Nazi party in Germany before Hitler revealed just how evil he was. They are the reason public school curricula have been lying for years about how the idea of fascism is a "far-right" ideology, when most aspects of it actually resemble the far-left playbook instead.

D'Souza even wrote in a separate article about what Germany was like for ordinary Germans during the war, and a lot of how the Nazi govt. ran things for regular Germans sounds eerily like what the Democrats really want to do to America right now, but can't because they're hampered by our Constitution.

The only reason they pretended to hate Hitler after 1939 was because it would look really bad for them to be supporting a guy who committed genocide and was pushing for world domination when the rest of the world didn't think it was very cool. So they had to change their tune as quickly as possible, and hope nobody would study history and find out who the closet Nazis were in America. If it weren't for that pesky 1st Amendment and the public's short memory, they would have memory-holed that whole admiration thing entirely and destroyed all evidence of their admiration of Hitler prior to 1939 entirely.

reply

and thought the Germans were running their country very efficiently
They were. It wasn't propaganda. Even with all the B.S. sanctions and the aftermath of the depression, Germany had the highest GDP in Europe, which made the usury merchants seethe. So save your "the big lie" BULLSHIT. These are facts, your faggot little poo is the liar. HE'S the propaganda. You're the mark.

reply

Aww, hey look everybody, JFZ is showing us how he deals with harsh reality and how to be tolerant to others. Isn't this little monkey adorable?

reply

What harsh reality? I already said that street shitter's narrative is utter bullshit and backed it up with facts. What does being tolerant even have to do with what we're talking about? Major cope.

reply

If you're citing D'Souza as a source for anything, you immediately lose all credibility. It takes some serious mental gymnastics to associate Democrats with Nazi sympathies. To take only one example Charles Lindbergh, a Republican, was famously a Nazi sympathizer before Pearl Harbor and Germany's declaration of war. He was a prominent member of the "America First Committee." Sound familiar? I'd suggest you read some actual history, but I'm sure you think that anything that doesn't agree with your rather unique and skewed views is some sort of propaganda.

reply

Was that your own idea, or something your Chinese masters programmed into you? Blocked, stinking bot.

reply

Ah yes, the last refuge of those without a rational argument, ad hominem. Happy to discuss *actual* history if you ever come out of your echo chamber.

reply

[–] KCurmudgeon (203) 10 days ago
Ah yes, the last refuge of those without a rational argument, ad hominem.


Hypocrite, "ad hominem" was literally your first set of feces.
[–] KCurmudgeon (203) 11 days ago
If you're citing D'Souza as a source for anything, you immediately lose all credibility.

reply

Except it's not. You apparently know as much about informal fallacies as you do about history.

reply