MovieChat Forums > Daniel Craig Discussion > Bad bond or just bad films?

Bad bond or just bad films?


Casino Royal sold me on him, then came Quantum which was disappointing after such a good start. Skyfall was a step in the right direction but Spectre is boring after the first 45 minutes.

So I think Craig is good but the plots or films are kinda crap the next better be a killer or it has to be his last!

reply

He is a bad actor be didn't do anything besides Bond, his Bond movies suck they're non canon (IMO)he's the greatest miscast in History

reply

Bad actor+Bad movies+Complete Disregard For Character & Source Material+SJW Box-ticking Agenda=Ruined Franchise.

They should leave the franchise alone for (at least) ten years.....and perhaps use such time to realise that a story pertaining to a ruthless, sexist, hedonistic spy....*not* be played by some pig-faced, solemn, introspective, sensitive 'New-age-man' (replete with box-ticking traits, tailored around whichever imaginary social injustice box needs a 'swoosh' that week?)

Casino Royal was catshit out of a dog's arsehole, and things haven't improved since.

Shame on *EVERYONE* that supported these movies (and the changes and directions associated with such?)

reply

LMAO😂

reply

Good

reply

Boring films.

reply

Decent actor but was never a good Bond. Many actors would have been able to make Casino Royale. IMO that movie seemed tailor made for Clive Owen & i'm still disappointed at the fact that he's now too old to be able to ever take up the mantle since Craig decided to selfishly cling to the role longer than any other Bond actor. He was given a lot more to work with than Pierce Brosnan & really benefited from high production values, along with the style/direction they took the franchise, which took many cues from the Bourne & Mission Impossible franchises.

reply