With her beauty shouldn't she be soaring in the industry by now ?
Seriously ?? how is it possible that she is not still famous . At least not at the level i envisioned .
shareSeriously ?? how is it possible that she is not still famous . At least not at the level i envisioned .
shareThis message has been deleted by an administrator
shareAgree. And with looks like Kirsten Stewart, her career sours more than it should be.
shareSeriously ?? how is it possible that she is not still famous . At least not at the level i envisioned .
to be fair, looks doesn't equal acting chops.
with that being said, she is certainly a far better actress than Kristin Stewart, and unfortunately that b!tch was everywhere a few years ago.
I think she's a really talented actress. She just hasn't transitioned from Indie movies which is a shame.
Hope she gets more bigger projects in they near future. She's gorgeous
Seriously ... To soar you also have to know how to act. Maybe the modeling industry.
shareAre you actively ignoring the descrepancy between the rumor you're perpetuating and Kristen Stewert's soaring career?
shareShe doesn't look like Kristen Stewart, she's MUCH prettier. And a much better actress. If she looks like anyone, it's Mary Elizabeth Winstead.
"Oh Benson, dear Benson, you are so mercifully free of the ravages of intelligence."
No, I mean, if Kristen Steward that is not pretty and doesn't know how to act can sour in Hollywood, this Camilla Belle should be doing even better.
share