MovieChat Forums > Michael Paré Discussion > What happened to Michael Paré? He was po...

What happened to Michael Paré? He was poised to be the next James Dean just like Brendan Fraser


https://www.quora.com/What-happened-to-Michael-Par%C3%A9-He-was-poised-to-be-the-next-James-Dean-just-like-Brandon-Frasier/answer/Jon-Mixon-1

Streets of Fire bombed - While it didn’t damage Diane Lane’s career, it may have wrecked Pare’s. It was a high profile leading role, and it just didn’t do that well. If it had, then Pare would have been a bigger star in the 1980s and even now.

The Philadelphia Experiment bombed - Again, another chance for him to shine and it didn’t happen.

Eddie and The Cruisers #1 did well. Eddie and The Cruisers #2 bombed - Pare could have made a slight “comeback” if the second film did well. It didn’t.

Starhunter was never a hit in the United States - If the sci fi television series Starhunter (featuring Pare) had been a major success, he would have become better known. It wasn’t.

He’s been taking dozens of roles in what is essentially schlock - While there were some “gems” in the mix (Bone Tomahawk, The Infiltrator, etc) most of his films in the last 25 years have been varying degrees of terrible. Although he has been working steadily as an actor, he missed the “star” train along time ago.

reply

His quotes on IMDB are insightful https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001595/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm

reply

Hey i didn't know he worked with David Lynch, He shot some scenes for Inland Empire that were cut.

reply

I liked his roles in Eddie and the Cruisers and Streets of Fire. He just kind of disappeared.

reply

Was just wondering the same and I think I have an answer. Hes not a very good actor and lacks charisma. Hes a serviceable actor and I never didnt like him he just isnt superstar/leading man material. Its seems hes found his niche in supporting role work and has become a thriving working actor. Its like a lot of other “where have they gone” types you think have disappeared only to look them up and find their body of work is substantial in quantity but not really in the “mainstream.”

reply

He essentially has found a career balance of appearing in big movies in small supporting roles (like LINCOLN LAWYER, etc) or bigger, closer-to-starring roles in micro-to-low budget movies (like these Rene Perez movies he's been popping up in lately). I'm sure the prior are better for prestige and pay better but they're a little fewer and farther between than the latter (for which he doesn't have to audition for and shows up on set for a couple of days). In a way it's kind of a similar career to Bruce Campbell, Udo Kier, Richard Tyson, Danny Trejo, Michael Madsen, etc. He had a leading man phase and still gets some larger roles, but they're in low budget movies whose producers probably felt lucky to get him, while the mainstream stuff he is still in throws him into small character roles.

reply

Never heard of him.

reply

You might want to check out STREETS OF FIRE and THE PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT. Both are kinda flawed masterpieces from the early 80's. STREETS is kinda the spiritual successor to THE WARRIORS weighed down by all the experimental but ill-fitting 80's rock music and 50's biker culture that it revolves around.

reply