Whatever 14 other women said is irrelevant to HorrorReporters OP and your original reply though.
HP stated that it's considered "claims" right now, because in the USA it's "innocent until guilty" and what-not. Until anything gets determined to be fact, it's (what the law calls) "alleged".
They also mentioned that it's weird that she didn't consider it abuse until 10 years later (maybe some people see the statement as being in bad taste, but it's also an accurate one).
My favourite part of their post was where they said it would be best for abuse to be focused on more by the authorities at the time, than by the media a decade later.
Then you hit them with a strawman:
"What the hell is wrong with you, that you think that covering up abuse and letting abusers get away with it is the right thing to do?"
You literally misread almost the entirety of their post, decided what you thought it should mean, then argued against your own conclusions...not what the post actually said.
HP doubled down and asked why it would take so long if it wasn't just a scandal...so you "doubled down" (kind of) and switched from a strawman argument to just straight up changing the goalpost.
"Well...14 other women said this.."
Interesting. But the topic wasn't about what 14 women said, the topic was about what the ONE woman said. 10 years later. And how authorities should lock onto that instead of the media.
reply
share
Otter (24464)
4 years ago
Like I said, "people with sense" would realize that Manson might have a problem, but MRA trolls and paid publicists' interns don't have sense.
reply
share
Windsaar (324)
4 years ago
I read what you said. That's how I was able to reply/comment. I couldn't very well have replied to something I didn't see.
In all honestly, it's the people with senselwho wait until the full stories are heard, or until allegations are proven before deciding whether or not something happened.
It's the people who lack sense who come to conclusions and make their own judgements.
It's kind of amusing to me, how a good chunk of my post was dedicated to how you were using strawman arguments between changing the goalposts, then you reply with something about "MRA trolls and paid publicists' interns". Which not only wasn't mentioned in this comment thread anywhere...it has little to nothing to do with the topic at hand.
It's nothing more than you just saying random shit and then commenting on that instead of the actual post lol.
reply
share