Wade's allegation of abuse at age 7 is very unlikely

I'm pretty sure that these doctors were paid off to protect his legacy, thats why even though micheal was an addict, his personal doctor has the blame pinned on him. his sister latoya said he didn't have it, qunicy jones said "micheal told me he didn't have it"

There are zero cases of someone w/vitligo turning completely white! It's spots and blotches. He had vitligo, then bleached the rest of his skin to hide it because he was a vain person and yet people try to use that to get him sympathy or act like he was a champion of the infliction. No, he wasn't. He was a coward. That's literally why he wore his sequin glove. He started bleaching his hand to test it, and did the rest of his skin and when you look at his ugly nails, you could tell. He couldnt bleach under there, and vitligo wasnt gonna do some spot touch up under his nails for him. Total phony from head to toe. A sick sick sick evil person.

Michael appeared to have some splotches on his face in the 80s and a few marks on his hands. This depigmentation could have been due to lupus. He was obviously engaging in whitening due to photos of him with white makeup going back to the early 80s. Latoya went white as a cosmetic choice.

I heard that he took medication that creates a vitiligo effect and after that he used bleaching creams to remove the weakened pigment. He couldn’t use those creams under his nails so he had very dark finger nails.

I think there is a strong case that the whitening was a choice and any natural depigmentation was quite limited.

Did you even read those links? lol

Here's some of my favorite bits from the Wikipedia one:

1.) These investigations occurred between 1993 and 2005 and in each allegation, the FBI found no evidence of criminal conduct on Jackson's behalf.

2.) The FBI meticulously went through all 16 hard drives and found nothing incriminating on them. The hard drives contained no form of illegal material, and the computer's history contained no record of accessing or searching for such material.

3.) In all these pages, hundreds of pages, many many hours of investigations ... there's not one scrap of evidence that Michael Jackson ever did anything wrong, committed any crime. It's almost a vindication, when you look at this. The FBI looked at all of these matters and said, 'There's nothing here.'

4.) In 2016, Radar Online alleged that child pornography was found in the 2003 raid of Jackson's properties, though Part 2 of the FBI files reveal no such evidence was found.

5.) Judge Melville, the presiding judge of Jackson's 2005 trial, also signed a press statement stating that no child pornography or anything illegal was ever found in Jackson's possession or on his properties.

Pretty much everything in that article is refuting allegations made against Jackson. And, comically, point 4 there is actually refuting the origins of your other source, haha.

As far as that other source goes, however (the parts I know are true), it wasn't much. Hence the FBI and judge's comments. Artsy books that can be purchased from Amazon. A plethora of straight, legal porn. A Gish Gallop of random stuff, shadily described and contextualized in ways designed to lead readers. I liked the part, for instance, where they lumped together 3 items in his search history to deceptively make it sound like they were related (i.e., putting one for adoption.com next to one for varsityteens.com lol).

Also, there was no mention (in either link) of the claim you made. Which was what you were asked to source.