MovieChat Forums > Michael Jackson Discussion > How come...

How come...

posted 5 years ago by holly61 (989)
5 replies | jump to latest

Jordan Chandler could identity the exact vitiligo pigment distribution on the back of Jackson's penis? I know his family took the settlement money (and that was a stupid decision) but he was clearly not lying about what happened.

[–] arflexit (2376) 5 years ago

Because someone that knew what Jackson's junk looked like described it to Chandler so he could give a 'credible' report. don't you know there was an anti-black systematic conspiracy against Jackson; they were just using the fact that Jackson liked to sleep in the same bed as young boys as ammunition to fuel this conspiracy.

BTW I am being sarcastic; but that is legitimately some of the 'defenses' of Jackson I have seen in this discussion.

[–] Furienna (3375) 5 years ago

That is just lies. Jordan has only given incorrect descriptions.

[–] arflexit (2376) 5 years ago

This is part of the problem with this argument; no one seems to have any facts straight; one person says the victims say one thing; then the credibility of the victims is attacked.

The facts are Jackson was totally inappropriate with his behavior with children and creates a situation in which the accusations (even if false) sound plausible. If he wasn't for a fact sleeping in the same bed as young boys (for example) the accusations would sound less credible. Then the answers he gives when asked about is are just odd and uncomfortable ("Their just ignorant" and all that) which makes the accusations sound even more credible because the dude was a weirdo.

He may very well not have been a pedophile but the amount of inappropriate behavior he had with young boys especially means that it makes those like me assume the accusations are true.

[–] Eric56 (4580) 5 years ago

Except it didn't match. If it did, he would've been arrested. The police did a search warrant where he was strip searched and MJ wasn't arrested. Not to mention, two separate grand juries in the 1993 case refused to indict MJ due to LACK OF EVIDENCE. Hence, it did not match.

[–] Threadkiller (3089) 5 years ago

Yawn