So they're not his biological kids right? - Michael Jackson Discussion

[–] Burk48917 (11536) 5 years ago

Why? Lots of people adopt or use donors. Do you think they consider their children weird?

reply

[–] LiquidOcelot (2452) 5 years ago

I didn't say his kids are weird, i'm saying his choice was weird. You're black, why are you using white (and whatever else they are) donors? And then lying and saying you used your own sperm? It makes him look like he hates his own race.

reply

[–] corey (774) 5 years ago

I remember hearing that Mark Lester is the biological father

reply

[–] LiquidOcelot (2452) 5 years ago

Sad really. I mean, MJ's genes are worth more than Mark friggin' Lester.

reply

[–] Furienna (3377) 5 years ago

Firstly, MJ wasn't 100 % black. Thus, he couldn't have 50 % black children with a white woman anyhow.
People with as much as 40 % African ancestry are also often able to pass as white. It is very much possible that MJ's kids would be somewhere around 30 % African.
Secondly, how is the paternity of his kids any of your business anyway?
They lost their father at a very young age and have suffered enough without these speculations floating around.

reply

[–] LiquidOcelot (2452) 5 years ago

Firstly, MJ wasn't 100 % black. Thus, he couldn't have 50 % black children with a white woman anyhow.

Oh quit being pedantic.

Secondly, how is the paternity of his kids any of your business anyway?

I know right? It's not as if he's a world famous celebrity or anything who people discuss on a daily basis. Jackass.

reply

[–] Furienna (3377) 5 years ago

Oh quit being pedantic.

Yes, let's not care about the facts.

Inknow right? It's not as if he's a world famous celebrity or anything who people discuss on a daily basis. Jackass.

So if your father had been a world famous celebrity, you would be okay with people making speculations about you on the internet?

reply

[–] LiquidOcelot (2452) 5 years ago

Yes, let's not care about the facts.

It's irrelevant to the point being made. Those kids don't look like they have any considerable black genes in them, which they would have if MJ was their biological father.

So if your father had been a world famous celebrity, you would be okay with people making speculations about you on the internet?

If my father had said I was his biological child and everything pointed to this being false? Then yes. If you lie to the world, karma gets you sooner or later.

reply

[–] Furienna (3377) 5 years ago

It's irrelevant to the point being made. Those kids don't look like they have any considerable black genes in them, which they would have if MJ was their biological father

They are most likely about 60-70 % European. So they wouldn't look as if they were Africans.

If my father had said I was his biological child and everything pointed to this being false? Then yes. If you lie to the world, karma gets you sooner or later.

You have no proof that he lied. It is not your business to speculate about his kids even if he did lie.

reply

[–] ItalianBuju (793) 4 years ago

Even if your percentages were true, which I think they are off.....no way he has three totally white passing children with straight hair if that is his DNA. That is just basic science.

reply

[–] Furienna (3377) 4 years ago

Now, it is not like I have the DNA result of either one of MJ's kids in my hand as cold hard facts.
So I'm just giving speculations about what their genetic percentage might be.

However, if you want to talk basic science? Then let me explain again: with a white mother and a father who was likely mixed (MJ's mother's family were "mulattos" and possibly partly Chinese), you will not look like an African.

Prince is confirmed with having vitiligo, just like MJ. That would be odd if there was no biological connection. Paris had curly hair as a child. She may still be naturally curly-haired as far as we know.

And really, why does it matter to you anyway if they were his biological children or not?

reply

[–] ItalianBuju (793) 4 years ago

It really does not matter to me lol
But reading through the threads and seeing your replies made me chuckle.
There is no way all three children come out looking like that with mixed heritage.

I have plenty of friends and family with varying degrees of mixed children and if anything, they might come out different looking., But the odds of all three having light skin and no black features at all is literally none.

One child, plausible.....three children, no way.

reply

[–] Furienna (3377) 4 years ago

There are plenty of families with mixed heritage, where not only one child could pass as white.
Just look at the family at the photo on the top of this page:
https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/10/07/354310370/a-chosen-exile-black-people-passing-in-white-america

Here's a different picture of the same family.
https://furienna.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/img_20200921_090119.jpg?resize=438%2C438

Now I guess that you will say "I can tell that they are black" just to get my goat. But they all managed to pass as white people for twenty years, back when it could be dangerous to hide your black heritage.

And a few photos from the 1860s show us some kids (probably siblings), who are light-skinned former slaves.

https://furienna.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/img_20200921_091500.jpg
https://furienna.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/img_20200921_091901.jpg

reply

[–] Threadkiller (3089) 5 years ago

His children are still his children regardless of whether or not they are his biologically (They clearly aren't) but it's ultimately not really important.

reply

[–] LiquidOcelot (2452) 5 years ago

There's a difference between children and biological children. Hence the title of this thread.

reply

[–] Threadkiller (3089) 5 years ago

The point is they were "his" kids regardless. He the raised & provided for them as their father .

reply

[–] LiquidOcelot (2452) 5 years ago

That's not the point i'm making though. I'm talking about whether they are his biological kids.

reply

[–] actionkamen (23176) 5 years ago

I strongly suspect they're his robotical children. Very suspicious indeed.

reply

[–] HAL9000 (935) 5 years ago

Dr. Arnold Klein

reply

[–] Threadkiller (3089) 5 years ago

Maybe but it will never be known for sure. I don't think it really matters

reply

[–] enriquesingh (1812) 4 years ago

It seems like he paid people to have these children and for him to adopt them, that's it.

Nor MJ's parents, nor his siblings seem to be mixed.

MJ will always be the King Of Pop, but the guy was weird... why was he like that?

I guess we will never know the truth, but I think his parents were not good people.

reply

[–] Eric56 (4580) 4 years ago

His unusual upbringing explains his "weirdness".

reply

[–] drrclavan (667) 4 years ago

The important thing is that wacko jacko pedo sicko does not have any biological offspring. One freak was enough.

reply