Scott Baio is innocent
horrible woman
shareYep
share
MovieChat Forums > Nicole Eggert Discussion > Scott Baio is innocent
You're just saying that because he loves Trump. "MUST. DEFEND. TRUMPER. RAPISTS." Nazi scum.
shareI think Nicole is very believable, but that doesn't mean a whole lot in a court of law. It's what you can "prove."
That she was defending her coworkers and the show back in the day is entirely possible, even probable -- given her age, intimidation issues, etc. But again, how can we know?
Easy for Baio to say he's innocent when there's no proof to the contrary. But we shouldn't assume guilt either.
Btw, the "she's just relaunching her career" is a horrible hypothesis.
She changed her story.
The first story was told in 2013.
In 2013, Eggert stated on the Nik Richie Radio show that she and Baio had a one-time encounter "years" after Charles in Charge ended, which would have been after 1990.
Then five years later she changed the story.
In 2018 on the Megyn Kelly show Eggert claimed that Baio molested her beginning in 1986 when she was 14, and that when she was 17, she had intercourse with him.
Why would she change the story years later? To be honest, it seems like (at least to me) she was lying about what she said in 2018. In 2013 said it was consensual and that it occurred MANY years after their show ended. The show ended in 1990. She was 18 when the show ended. Why come out MANY years later and tell a completely different story?
Why would she change the story years later?
Before I answer that I want to qualify my answer - I don't know any person involved and have no dog in the fight. I also don't have a clue who is telling the truth, who is lying, or who is just misremembering.
But to answer why she might change her story years later, it could be that her first story was just following the old "wink and nod" business of Hollyweird - say nothing - "that's the way it is". Perhaps in the next 5 years she decided to tell the truth.
share