What evidence did they have on him?

"The problem is that there's no actual evidence that this really happened, since they didn't testify officially until the original accusation was known."

That's wrong. Constandt's accusation was not known. All they knew was that he had been accused of sexual misconduct. They gave their stories separately, not knowing of each other's details, yet they were all the SAME. That right there, for a logical, intelligent, unbiased person, is proof.

You don't read thoroughly; which is the case with every single Cosby supporter I have come across.

You can all cry for a monster when he dies in prison.

“we know that when women wait years before coming forward that it’s usually BS enlightbof the “me too” movement..”
Do we also “know” that the Earth is flat and it was created in a few days? How truly ignorant that statement is, not to mention cold and unsympathetic.

Remember Dr. Barbara Ziv’s testimony from the retrial? Oh, sorry, right. You didn’t follow the trial. Here it is for you to prattle on against science.

https://www.thelily.com/the-bill-cosby-trial-touches-on-common-rape-myths/

This was exactly the issue with the McMartin PreSchool trial. The prosecution had over 100+ children accusing seven members of the McMartin/Bucky family of any number of crimes. The problem was, no proof. They claimed Satanic rituals were happening every day, animals being killed, blood drunk, and carcasses buried all over the property of the school. Tunnels under the school that led to Dodger Stadium where the LA Dodgers and Tommy LaSorda took part in the rituals wearing hoods and cloaks, and babies being sacrificed and their blood drunk. Where did it all go wrong? A zealous defense attorney who looked into the techniques used to interview the kids and how the team used to do the interviewing were all in the pay of the prosecution. Next up: No proof of any animal bones, baby bones or tunnels buried or anything under the property except for one storage room on the basement level where desks, easels, and other school-related stuff was stored. So now because of a bunch of zealous prosecutors over 100+ adults now believe they were molested/raped by these members of the McMartin/Bucky family and nothing anyone says to them makes them believe any different.

So now we move onto the Canadian case of former CBC broadcaster Jian Ghomeshi where three women accused him of sexual improprieties. Ghomeshi chose a bench trial and in his not guilty verdict, Judge William Horkins referred to the collusion between the three women at the heart of the case of having lied...no PERJURED themselves on the stand in order to "get" Ghomeshi. None of these women have been charged for perjury, rather they're celebrated as "brave" women who were "abused" and "used" by Ghomeshi. This despite the fact Ghomeshi had a ton of emails, texts, and other proof of ongoing relationships with each of these women beyond the point where they said their "abuse" happened. The end of the story is this, Ghomeshi lost his job, reputation, money, and much, much more and these women are still called "brave" for having "endured" Ghomeshi's abuse. These women were destroyed on the stand by Ghomeshi's attorney Marie Heinen, yet they still get to be called "brave".

Ironically when Constand took her story to Dateline NBC, those who commented on the show's Facebook page on the episode came out steadfastly against her. I'd say the amount of disdain for her was at about 75%.

You're funny. In one post you make a sarcastic remark that suggests that Bill Cosby, international superstar, felt he needed to drug women to get sex.

Then, in your next post you say that even though she supposedly went over there for sex, he drugged and raped her anyway. You make no sense.

Additionally, you clearly know next to nothing about this case. Actually, she went over there to talk about her career. Not as boring as taxes, but still pretty tame. He was mentoring her. That's what he did to a lot of these women. He talked about her career not only with her, but with parents, as he did with others. Did you know she's gay? She's not even into men, so why would she want sex from him?

And FYI, just because a woman goes over to a friend's house, and that friend is a man, it does not in any way suggest that she's there to get laid. They had even discussed on the phone why she was going there. Are you writing from the time machine of a hundred years ago?

You really should do some research. I've been following this story since it broke in October of 2014 and I have read at least one article on every single major development.

And even IF she had gone over there with sex on her mind, which I guarantee, she had not, drugging and raping her is still DRUGGING AND RAPING HER. THOSE ARE CRIMES.

And did you even bother to read my entire post from earlier? When all of those women came forward, the ones back in 2005 went to her lawyer and were interviewed individually and never met each other until over ten years later. The details of her case were secret. All they knew was that he was being sued for sexually misconduct. They didn't know the details. And then, after Buress, the next 50+ women went to news agencies and the details were still A SECRET. It wasn't until WAAAAYYYYYY after this army of accusers had all gone public with their own details that the depo was exposed. Do you understand this???

And actually, the jury made a public group statement saying that they had found her to be a credible witness. Do you know what that means? Ok, I'll tell you. It means they BELIEVED WHAT SHE SAID. And being in contrast to what he said, they believed he lied.

So you are wrong. They did not think she went over there for sex.

How old are you?

So I point out that the burden of proof is on the accuser, and you suggest that I should go to some Reedukation Center.

Nice times XDDDDDDD

What evidence? This is a “he said” vs a “she said” case. Cosby gave her party pills and she willingly took them knowing the consequences....until she regretted it later and cried rape. It’s not such a cut a dry case but I could see how Cosby thought he had the consent to have sex with her.

so was heroin, ergo everyone injected that into their partner with it, right?

In English, please.

Alcohol is sometimes a casual drug in which you go to the bar and unwind, it’s not always for party purposes so it requires a higher level of consent. Apples and Oranges!!!!