MovieChat Forums > Roman Polanski Discussion > Complete list of sick f*cks who signed p...

Complete list of sick f*cks who signed petition in support of Polanski


https://www.imdb.com/list/ls090808434/

Some redacted later on but most have not.

reply

I think doing anything sexual with someone under 16 is quite controversial, maybe even illegal depending on where you live, the age of consent varies all over the world.

That said, I think if the roles were reversed (an older Hollywood actress sleeping with a young guy) no one would screaming "sick fucks" at the ones on a list like this. I mean, personally, I'm pretty sure I would have done some sexual stuff with older women when I was in my teens.

But the worst ones are on that list, like Weinstein and Allen, even though I like Woody's films a lot, I do think he could be a flawed individual but I suppose we all are to some degree.

reply

He's taking an awfully long time to die. When the pervy old Jew eventually pops his clogs it's gonna be interesting who publicly laments his passing or turns up at the funeral.

reply

Well maybe so, maybe not. One neither supports nor denounces Roman Polanski. We have seen it over and over - false accusations of sexual impropriety. However, in this case, one has to believe he is guilty. If he wasn't -then why did he flee the country? If I remember correctly, he was accused of being improper with a 13 year old girl. Well, I have to believe he was. And if in fact he was improper - well, then he has to pay. That's how it works. I don't really have any sympathy for the guy. You play, you pay, very simple. I do feel sorry for the men who have done absolutely nothing wrong, are accused - and pay one way or another. A ruined reputation (Woody Allen for example), or, a friend of mine. He was accused of child molestation while going thru a divorce. He proved, in court, he had never done any such thing. Of course it cost him 20 grand in legal fees to do so. I feel real sorry for guys like him. But Polanski - no sympathy, pay the piper like everyone else does.

reply

"Well maybe so, maybe not. One neither supports nor denounces Roman Polanski."
"But Polanski - no sympathy, pay the piper like everyone else does."

Aha​...you just contradicted yourself. 😎
In THIS thread with THIS header. ☻

Polanski's case is clear to people who can read.
Polanski paid for what he did in 1977, that's 46 years ago.
https://moviechat.org/nm0000591/Roman-Polanski/5f4572274be2591e0ac3feeb/The-only-one-who-should-be-in-jail-is-Judge-Rittenband?reply=658bf283287ac02f71fc3267

reply

Hey TimeTunnel. Well, I suppose I did contradict myself a bit. Maybe one should have said - "I really don't care either way". However, I do believe, if you commit a crime, you should pay. Ok, you are saying Polanski did pay in 1977. I wasn't aware of this. The only thing I was aware of was him fleeing the country.

Let me read your link.....

reply

Ok, I stand corrected. If I was at risk of a 50 year sentence, I'd have been long gone, too.

And the fact he was chased down in 2009 makes it understandable why he never came back.

There is only one thing that doesn't make sense to me - who is after him now? I'm assuming the judge that was threatening 50 years is long gone. Even Geimer (whom I assume is the victim) doesn't seem to care anymore. Why is anyone wasting time and resources chasing this man down?

reply

You can ask me more questions in the other thread.
You just followed the link....here it is again.
https://moviechat.org/nm0000591/Roman-Polanski/5f4572274be2591e0ac3feeb/The-only-one-who-should-be-in-jail-is-Judge-Rittenband?reply=658bf283287ac02f71fc3267

reply

You are very devoted to defending an adult male that drugged and screwed a little girl.

Do you have no shame or do you have an alarming fetish?

reply

Ok, this appears to be my interest today, hahaahhaahah.

To Shogun - in defense of TimeTunnel - Polanski was potentially facing 50 years. Would you have hung around for that? I wouldn't have. ANd I personally am not defending what he did. It was wrong, and punishment, punishment I think was appropriate, was levied on him. You have to read TimeTunnel's link to understand Polanski's original punishment.

It's the 50 year business that made him take off. I have to defend this action on his part cuz I would have done exactly the same thing.

reply

I'd feel icky even attempting to defend an adult male that drugged and assaulted a little girl.
I understand you are trying to be polite and humane and I appreciate that but certain lines cannot be crossed.

Honestly, I'd have him drug out back behind the barn and get a few good boys to bust him up real proper with axe handles and pipes. Leave no joint unbroken. A message needs to be sent.

This guy sodomized a young girl and he's living in a chalet, eating steaks like nothing happened?
Interpol won't launch an operation to kidnap this piece of garbage and rough him up 'til he can't see straight.

Phooey!
The bastard should be made to pay.

reply

Understood Shogun. Although I have to say some of your comments do make you seem a bit immature and close minded.

He had a punishment levied on him. It was appropriate (IMO anyway).

He left because he thought he was going to get 50 years in prison. As I said, I would have done the same thing. This is what I'm defending, his action of leaving the country because it looked like he was going to get 50 years in prison.

I'm not defending what he did to the little girl. It was horrible. But again, I think the original punishment was appropriate.

Your last comments, it makes you sound like the Mossad who never gave up on Nazi war criminals. Nazi war criminals, yeah, they should have been chased down forever. I think time is up on Polanski's crime.

reply

Immature? I'll wrestle you right now boy, if I have one failing it's I got no goddam quit in me.

EVERY Nazi needed to be hanged.
WTF are you talking about?


And are you still defending a kiddie raper you nut?
How's about two blasts behind the ear with a .32? It's a fairly quiet revolver and it will get the job done. Colt used to make a nice nickle plated one, thing hardly kicked at all.

reply

Hahhaahahahh. Calm down man.

Ok, Im tiring of this - but a few more final thoughts.

I have to ask, do you know how to read, and do you know how to comprehend what you are reading? I said the Nazi's should have been chased down forever.

I also said I wasn't defending what Polanski did to the girl, I was defending him taking off. Can you honestly say you'd have hung around if you were looking at 50 years in jail?

Your last two sentences make it seem like you need professional help. Maybe you should get some. Ok, that's all I have to say on this. Best wishes SHogun.

reply

Best surrender ever.
So happy to be a part of your epic quit Nazi and kiddie rapist defender.

Fuck off.

reply

Wow, I was done with this, however.....

Brother you are bananas. Really, seriously, get some help. ANd if you are trying to get under my skin, it will never work. You'll never rattle me no matter how hard you try.

The only thing you are doing is successfully making yourself look like a nut case.

Go get some help young man. I was joking at first, I now think you seriously need it.

Ok and best wishes to you - to make it clear, I am not surrendering, I am not quitting, and you are not getting under my skin. I've had my fill of you - you're not interesting enough for me to continue. This is why I'm signing off. Take care.

reply

cool rage quit dummy.

reply

Henry Winkler touched on this type of problem in the August '77 issue of Playboy...

Lawrence Grobel: Drugs and 13-year-old girls were in the news not long ago in the case of Roman Polanski. What was your reaction to that?

Winkler: It happens all the time. That's just the way it is. Lewis Carroll wrote Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, which everybody reads as a classic, and what did he do? He used to take pictures of little girls too, and seduce them or try to. It's not a new problem. 13-year-old girls in Hollywood, California and other places in this country are not 13-year-old girls that we used to know. Kids are much more sophisticated now. They know more, have experienced more. And at 13, they're 29 years old. It's really a bummer. A shame.

reply