Bruce Willis asked to leave store for ‘refusing’ to wear a mask
share
i wouldn't ask him to leave. but i would keep my distance.
share
MovieChat Forums > Bruce Willis Discussion > Bruce Willis asked to leave store for ‘r...
Good for him! “Covid” is ALL about control.
shareBy putting quote marks around "refusing" you imply that he didn't actually refuse, or that there was something not quite refusal-like in his refusal.
But if he did refuse, I admire him for not being a typical Hollywood sheep. The face-diaper cult has gone too far. Science does not support it (real science, that is, not ideologically motivated "science" [see how those quote marks work?]).
Where is this science?
shareAll over the map. Everything/ all sides have been said on the masks.
Simply put though, very few people buy the actual medical grade masks and if you don't buy them you are completely wasting your money. COMPLETELY WASTING YOUR MONEY.
Cheap dust masks do nothing against Covid 19. NOTHING.
Most masks you see in public are cheap dust masks.
IF you believe in C19 IF IF....
wear a real medical grade mask and wash your hands and stay the F away from people.
Don't watch TV, they're nothing but liars.
Again, where is your proof?
shareEverytime that I post do I have to write a book?
Do I need proof that cheap dust masks do nothing when the cheap ass Chinese company is brave enough to put on the box, NOT A MEDICAL DEVICE. Is that proof? When the company tells you no? IS IT???????
Do I need proof to tell people IF they are going to wear a mask, wear one that is ACTUALLY MEDICAL GRADE. Anything else just makes people feel good and does...
NOTHING.
Again, where is your proof?
Shut the fuck up.
It took you 6 months to come back with shut the fuck up?
There have been plenty of studies that show that masks do help slow the spread. https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2020/06/417906/still-confused-about-masks-heres-science-behind-how-face-masks-prevent
This one mentions cloth masks which is what I see mostly
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449
There's also Leffler et al. (29) used a multiple regression approach, including a range of policy interventions and country and population characteristics, to infer the relationship between mask use and SARS-CoV-2 transmission. They found that transmission was 7.5 times higher in countries that did not have a mask mandate or universal mask use, a result similar to that found in an analogous study of fewer countries (30). Another study looked at the difference between US states with mask mandates and those without, and found that the daily growth rate was 2.0 percentage points lower in states with mask mandates, estimating that the mandates had prevented 230,000 to 450,000 COVID-19 cases by May 22, 2020
https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2014564118
So yeah, this shows that non medical grade masks work as well.
So yeah, this shows that non medical grade masks work as well.
It's too bad you didn't actually read any of the primary sources so you could see that the efficacy of masks has largely been exaggerated. But go ahead, just copy and paste mainstream articles (that are notoriously unrepresentative of the actual research articles behind them). And lol, even your PNAS link, you only copied and pasted what they wrote about other articles instead of reading the studies yourself. share
I thought it was pretty obvious that I copied and pasted what they they wrote and then linked the source which linked to their sources.
I would like to know where you have proof that the efficacy of masks is exaggerated, while stating how. I have stated no where that masks stop the spread. Masks help with having a barrier for the dispersion of the droplets. That's what they do.
Washing hands is most important.
Here's the thing. Wearing a mask isn't that big of an inconvenience. It really isn't. My freedom hasn't been taken away. I don't wear it to protect myself. If I have covid and don't know it, and wearing a mask might possibly prevent someone else from getting covid from me it's worth it. I actually plan to keep my masks past the pandemic and wearing one if I have a cold.
I thought it was pretty obvious that I copied and pasted what they they wrote and then linked the source which linked to their sources.
It is obvious. And that's why I guarantee that you never actually read any of the primary sources. Like right there, you referenced "Leffler et al. (29) used a multiple regression approach, including a range of policy interventions and country and population characteristics, to infer the relationship between mask use and SARS-CoV-2 transmission."
But I bet you didn't actually read the sourced article:
C. T. Leffler et al., Association of country-wide coronavirus mortality with demographics, testing, lockdowns, and public wearing of masks
mean I could be wrong, but I doubt it.
I would like to know where you have proof that the efficacy of masks is exaggerated, while stating how.
lol, what are you even asking? A number of studies have been published. I read the studies. And then I compare the actual findings to how they're summarized or how they're used to justify certain conclusions.. There's no "proof" of my stance. I'm just a consumer of the research findings; that's what they're there for. That's just what I'm arguing for. I could be wrong. But right or wrong, I can only engage with someone who's actually read the studies.
Here's the thing. Wearing a mask isn't that big of an inconvenience.
I really don't care. I wear masks all the time too. I don't think my freedom has been taken away. So I don't know why you brought any of that nonsense up. Which just reinforces that you don't actually care about the science here. Don't pull text that you haven't vetted, and call it "proof". share
I actually did read the Leffer paper, which is why I chose to cite that part of the pnas article. Did you read it?
I'm not really sure what your point is here? Do you think that I just post things without reading them? I don't think that there is any part of the paper that would disagree with what I've posted.
Wow, you ARE an imbecile!
That is scientifically proven.
Pretty stupid move on his part.
sharePossibly.
I mean, what are they gonna do throw his money out of the bank...
https://www.news24.com/citypress/news/deutsche-bank-dumps-trump-20210112
Kind of ironic really as I would have thought celebrities would jump at the chance to wear a mask and not be recognised out and about.
Don't know if he was always like this but Bruce is more than a little odd these days. Loved him in hit movies down the years but he's really slimy these days.
Also does he live in some reserve with his ex wife, his current wife and the whole family? Fucking strange.
And none of his daughters with Demi Moore are good looking. They look a little odd too.
I think that Bruce is the sort that likes freedom and doesn't like to be given mandates, especially mandates to do things that have no proven benefit for anyone.
shareThis is just a stupid clickbait article with no real insight into anything.
"We’re told the “Die Hard” star, who was photographed at the store without a mask on, walked away without making his purchase."
Two pictures equate to him being asked to leave for refusing to wear a mask? Literally only because someone said so without any real evidence or real context.
Anyone judging the situation from the headline alone is an idiot. Majority of the article isn't even about the headline.
badass i like him more
share