Cowardly director.


I'm a huge purveyor of quantity with regards to filmographies, so this dudes plan to retire after only 10 movies is truly pathetic to my eyes.

My outlook is that every movie has it's fans. The more the merrier. A few poor ones doesn't damage the overall reputation.

You can see many horror directors like Tobe Hooper, John Carpenter, George Romero & Dario Argento. Who exited their primes and delivered poor movies... still it doesn't stop everyone praising them for all the good they did.

This dork Tarantino needs to grow a pair and keep making movies the rest of his days. Say to hell with your precious reputation.

"I'm really well versed on a lot of directors' careers, you know, and when you look at those last five films when they were past it, when they were too old, and they're really out of touch with the times, whether it be William Wyler and The Liberation of L.B. Jones or Billy Wilder with Fedora and then Buddy Buddy or whatever the hell. To me, it's all about my filmography, and I want to go out with a terrific filmography. Death Proof has got to be the worst movie I ever make. And for a left-handed movie, that wasn't so bad, all right? -- so if that's the worst I ever get, I'm good. But I do think one of those out-of-touch, old, limp, flaccid-dick movies costs you three good movies as far as your rating is concerned."

https://collider.com/quentin-tarantino-death-proof-worst-film-interview/

reply

Basically you are saying that he is a good director ( which i totally agree with) and he should make more movies ?
He is free to do what he fucking wants, and so are you. You can do something interesting with your life out just keep posting retarded shit on forums, up to you

reply

Nah he's not a good director but he should grow a pair and make movies for the fun of it, not to cultivate a 'legacy'.

If he let loose he might actually improve as a director. He praises a lot of slasher movies, he should make one. I'd like to see it.

You can take your own advice and go do something else with your life, this is a movie discussion forum and if discussions pertaining to movies annoy you then why even bother with this site.

reply

He made slasher movies with Robert Rodriguez. What are you talking about?

reply

Death Proof isn't a slasher movie. It's barely even a horror movie, semi-horror adjacent.

reply

planet terror? From dusk till dawn?

reply

Those are Rodriguez directed movies, so they're not part of Tarantino's filmography. Yes those two are horror but the thing is Rodriguez is a director who will go to those 'depths'. He isn't afraid to make a horror b-movie, Tarantino is that's the difference.

Tarantino wouldn't want those movies in his filmography, as it would damage his reputation he's trying to cultivate.

reply

You may have a valid point

reply

THE DUDE IS RETIRING...WE SHOULD ALL BE SO LUCKY TO BE SO GOOD AT WHAT WE DO THAT WE CAN SET OUT OWN TERMS AND WALK AWAY FROM WORK AT THE AGE WE PICK...THE MAN HAS NEVER MADE A BAD FILM...HE GETS NOTHING BUT LOVE FROM ME...I HOPE HE ENJOYS WHATEVER IT IS HE PLANS ON DOING AFTER MAKING FILMS.

reply

Off topic, but what's your quick thoughts on Kubrick? His filmography didn't have a lot of quantity towards the end, with long gaps between films.

reply

Overrated.

One could argue he's a poor director... in that as a director he took a very long time to make movies and his productions ran on forever with him doing a ridiculous amount of takes. A lot of other directors are more fine tuned and professional. Many can churn out quality movies like clockwork.

One tidbit that always stuck with me is Scatman Crothers talking about the direction he got from Kubrick on The Shining. It was the scene where he walks into the overlook hotel to try rescue Danny. Kubrick told him to do the walk over and over again, some 30 times I think, without ever giving him any pointers on what to do. Just told him to do it again. That doesn't sound like good direction to me.

He also was an asshole to Duvall. Directors being nasty to their actors is always a negative.


In saying all this I do like some of his movies, but as you say his filmography is sparse so he doesn't rank highly for me. All that squeezing wasn't worth the extra juice in my opinion. When you hear that he did 100+ takes on some scenes you're left wondering was take 101 really that much better than 64 and was that much better than take 17.

reply

I'm totaly with you on Kubrick!

reply

I think he’s only fooling himself. He’ll make plenty more movies, he just works at a slower pace. He won’t retire, he’ll do more, I sure hope he does as he’s excellent at his work.

reply

Be grateful for what you have and what is available to you and let go of this petulant entitlement, it’s not a good look and certainly not conducive to a healthy sense of self as well as being.
I’m not trying to poke you, just keeping it real.

reply

I've always counted From Dusk till Dawn in his cannon, he might not have pointed the camera but they came out of his mind. He even had Harvey Keitel and Earl Mcgraw in the cast. That was 50/50 co direction he can say what he wants

reply

THE FIRST HALF OF THAT MOVIE IS STRAIGHT OUT OF TARANTINO'S HEAD.

reply