Anti-Vaxer - Won't VAX his Kids
share
Not surprised. Would he VAX for work? Would he VAX his parents? They would be much more vulnerable. Is he flexible or just anti?
share
MovieChat Forums > Matthew McConaughey Discussion > Anti-Vaxer - Won't VAX his Kids
When it comes to small children, it's not clear whether the vaccine has more pros than cons.
For example, UK decided that for healthy children, the vaccination was counterproductive.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-clinically-vulnerable-children-will-be-offered-covid-vaccines-but-most-teenagers-will-not-12359191
Here you have a quite good article about pros and cons of vaccinating children. I'm sorry, it's in Spanish, but google translate is your friend.
https://microbioblog.es/cinco-preguntas-antes-de-decidir-si-vacunamos-a-los-ninos-contra-la-covid-19
Please, stop using the term 'anti-vax' with anybody who just doesn't follow the herd. When people do that, the term ends up losing its meaning. I've seen it with the 'negationist' term, it seems that 'anti-vax' is the next one.
Quoted from the linked article
https://microbioblog.es/cinco-preguntas-antes-de-decidir-si-vacunamos-a-los-ninos-contra-la-covid-19
Translated to English through Google Translate:
Five questions before deciding whether to vaccinate children against COVID-19
1. Is vaccination justified from an individual risk-benefit point of view?
Children under 12 years of age are at low risk of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 and developing serious illness. In Spain, less than 0.02% of deaths from COVID-19 have been under 12 years of age. The vast majority of cases in young children are asymptomatic. Adverse effects from vaccines are extremely rare, but they are not zero. Is it worthwhile, on an individual level, to vaccinate children against a disease that for most of them does not cause a serious pathology? The direct benefit to them is likely to be small and the requirement for vaccine safety has to be higher.
2. Are minors really a reservoir or store of the virus, are they great transmitters of the virus?
There is little evidence that children have been large transmitters of the virus, that they have generated large outbreaks. The educational centers were open, even when there were no vaccines, and it does not appear that there has been a collapse of the system due to major epidemics in the schools. However, the emergence of more communicable variants, such as delta, at a time when the adult population is largely vaccinated, may change the situation. The virus moves where we left it, mainly in the unvaccinated. It will be necessary to monitor how the incidence of the new variants evolves in the population under 12 years of age.
3. Can natural immunity be of greater future benefit than vaccination?
Some have suggested that natural exposure at an early age to this virus that causes little pathology can stimulate the immune system in a way that represents an advantage over future exposures to this or other coronaviruses in adulthood, in which the disease is much more severe. serious. It is not necessary to vaccinate against each and every one of the existing pathogens, but only against those that really compensate (risk-benefit balance).
(TO BE CONTINUED)
share
(CONTINUE)
4. Shouldn't the older vulnerable be vaccinated earlier in other countries where there is a shortage of vaccines?share
The pandemic is a global problem. In many countries the% of the vaccinated population is very low, they do not have the necessary vaccines. Perhaps before vaccinating minors who are at low risk of becoming ill, the available doses should be donated to countries with little access to vaccines in which they still have a long way to go to protect their most vulnerable citizens with the highest risk of dying from COVID-19 .
5. Is there consensus or scientific evidence that justifies childhood vaccination?
At this time, there are no data on its efficacy and safety in young children. It does not seem that it is necessary to vaccinate children to have control of the pandemic globally, at the moment. As I have commented, it would be necessary to monitor how the incidence of the new variants evolves in the population under 12 years of age, before deciding whether it is necessary to vaccinate them. After all, COVID-19 is an especially adult disease.
Right on! He's not a pro-vax lunatic!
shareyeah nobody knows what kinda damage this will do on the children, crazy people are demanding it is ridiculous! sheeple who watch to much tv are the most dangerous
shareWhat damage??? Crazy people???
Right now, in the case of healthy small children, pros and cons are about equal when it comes to Covid vaccine. Vaccinating them or not, it's gonna be more or less the same. Vaccinating your children or not, both choices are reasonable.
Holy shit, it sounds like some people are finding here a replacement for religion. Damn, go to some temple, or a church, or a mosque. If you wanna have a religion so much, use a proper one.
nobody know what is in this mcfranklinvax mystery shot except the evil motherfuckers who made this thing. the government is waving them off all financial responsibility since they know there will be long term effects yet at the same time pushing people to get this shit or lose their jobs. it is truly evil what is going on. i made over a million bucks since this pandemic so i dont need a job but i feel so bad for average joes who are getting boned by the government and taking this shit. the children is the saddest. they are gonna destroy a whole generation
shareI'm a priest of the Ivermectin Cult!
shareshut up, worry about other things, sheep.
shareWell yeah considering the probability of kids dying of Covid is in the millions. And the long term side effects of the so-called “vaccine” are completely unknown.
For age 54 the chance of dying if you catch Covid is 1/3,333. It’s exponentially lower as you get younger. There is zero reason anyone under 30 should be vaccinated.
agreed, scientists have yet to explain why more and more kids are developing Autism and Downs Syndrome.
a guy I work with, his kid who was perfectly normal got a shot for something, (I cant remember what it was), but after he got it, he got a severe form of Autism. he is now around 30 and has to be monitored all the time. its sad...
You don't get autism from an injection of ANYTHING. Do you ever fact check something before you believe it?
sharesure, tell that to the guy I work with, he will disagree with you.
https://medium.com/@kimberlydrake21/cdc-quietly-removes-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism-from-autism-and-vaccines-webpage-39522ee61968
Uhhh, a guy "I" work with thinks the Earth is flat. Does that make him right?
Look at your source. Is it a trustworthy, factual source?
yeah, I have known him for 20 years, he has no reason to lie to me. I am just telling you what he told me years ago, we were talking about autism and other stuff and he told me about how the doctors gave his son something when he was 6 or 7. after that he was never the same, he said he regrets doing it to this day. he pretty much feels responsible for his sons current condition. that would suck though, to accidentally ruin your childs life like that.
shareHoo-boy. So the problem here isn’t what he believes, he may totally believe that his son was screwed up by a vaccine. I have a nephew who has autism and my brother believes that it was caused by a vaccine as well.
That is not where the evidence leads. The theory that autism was caused by vaccination was flawed when it was introduced and immediately disproved by science but it caught on because we all have apprehension about things pushed on us by society.
The truth is that my brother didn’t want to believe that his son was born that way and it was easier for him to blame something else rather than face that truth. I don’t think your friend is knowingly using that as an excuse, I believe that people convince themselves that it’s true. Also, autism doesn’t really show itself until around the same time that infants get vaccinated.
The vaccination is not a dose of autism. You aren’t normal one day and autistic the next as your friend is saying. These vaccines have been thoroughly tested and no connection has EVER been proven. People were worried about mercury or thimerosol, that is a justified concern so they again wen’t through a ridiculous amount of testing and was even removed, people still insisted that they were toxic so how do you convince people if they won’t believe science? It’s the best method we have to discovering truth.
bruh, I am just telling you what he told me, if someone you knew for 10 years and they told this story would you try to convince them they are wrong? its his son, I am not going to tell him he is a liar and a fraud and to look to science. he told me he feels guilty for letting the doctors give him something when his son was a kid. his son just sits in the house all day everyday and does nothing but play video games. how sad is that? as a parent, it must be heartbreaking.
by the way, science changes, doctors used to drill holes in peoples heads, and Curie accidentally killed herself with radiation. in the year 2121, people will look back at us like we were caveman. just as we do the same to people years ago. Pluto wasnt a planet, then it was a Planet, now its not a Planet, make up your minds science! doctors used to endorse smoking. we used to put mercury in thermometers, we used to spray DDT in the 50's and kids would play in it. as humans, we think we are smart, but we are not, as science is ever changing...
You obviously don't know what the hell you're talking about. Are you aware of the use of mercury as a preservative? Probably not.
I know you have your head buried in your ass but kids don't just stop talking and eating for no reason whatsoever.
How do you know if what you are being told is the truth?
shareA lot of the more airheaded hippie-ish Lefties are anti-vaccine across the board, like no childhood vaccines and no flu shots, and anti-western medicine. They go around saying things like "Big Pharma is poison", and believe that all human ills can be cured by organic, raw, and/or vegan food, meditation or magic, herbal or homeopathic medicines, ayahuasca and weed.
A lot of them appear to glow with health, with their yoga, organic diets, and low-stress lifestyles. But if they get seriously ill in spite of their lifestyle, they do tend to respond... irrationally.
If I had to guess, I'd say his stance is neither informed by science nor moral principles. It's informed by the current political situation. It's an attempt to appear reasonable in order to acquire public office.
shareMy thoughts exactly. He's also aware that he trends more popular than Gov. Abbott, but furthermore he doesn't pander to the Liberal-Left narrative like that other Irishman who calls himself "Beto" to appear Tex-Mex. Matt probably figures that he can explore his chances by gliding in the middle
shareThe "vaccine" is still, STILL, in the testing phase.
It is in FACT an EXPERIMENTAL drug. FACT. MEDICAL FACT.
Now go give your kids some experimental drugs.
Oh yeah,
One more thing.
Some of your kids will die from this drug.
Now go get them jabbed.