1975? Really?


Was she really born in 1975?
I just saw the 1989 episode of Married With Children that she was in, and she definitely looked older than 14 in that episode.
Plus, I read somewhere that she and Christina Applegate attended high school together, and Christina is from 1971.
If Milla is also from 1971 then she would have been 17-18 in that episode of MWC (co-incidentally also the age her character is said to be), which would make much more sense.

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

She is born 75 and as they were on the same highschool it didnt have to mean the same grade.

reply

If they really were 4 years apart, shouldn't Christina have graduated by the time Milla started? And if they were 3 classes apart (making Milla a freshman when Christina was a senior) would you really describe that as "attending high school together"? At the most I would describe that as "attended the same high school at the same time". It seems to me that attending something together would suggest some contact. I never knew a single person either three years in front, or three years behind me, and AFAIK that same goes for the people I associated with as well.

Plus, you don't explain the fact that she played a 17-year-old on that episode in 1989. Why would they cast a 13-year-old (if her birthdate and the airdate are correct here she would have only been 13) to play a 17-year-old? It's usually the other way around in Hollywood. They get 20-somethings to play 16-year-olds.

Also, if those dates are right, the first time she married would have been when she was only 16. That also seems slightly unlikely.

Perhaps you are right and I'm reading too much into this. But knowing the fact that IMDb is often wrong about the dates of birth (and they often base it on shady sources, seeing as the stars themselves don't want their true birthdays to be known because that might potentially damage their carreer when they start getting older, which was even in the news recently), it seems to me that it is not completely unlikely that that is also the case here.

reply

Well, if she wasn't born in 1975 she and her people have done a great job of hiding the fact. Her own personal website lists her DOB as 17 December 1975, as does any other source I could find.

Re-watching the MWC episode, it's not terribly hard to see how she was cast as a 16-18 year-old. She looked it well enough. And as far as HS goes, it depends on the school and the classes. My school was only mid-sized. My Freshman year I was in with plenty of juniors and seniors. If Milla was an acting student, she probably was at least known on campus and also probably spent a decent amount of time with upperclassmen.

reply

I just saw that episode, and based on when it aired she would have had to be only 13 when it was filmed. She was WAY to hot to be 13. No way. Plus I can not see the producers casting a 13 year old in such a sexy role anyhow.
Something is not right.

reply

Despite the infantilization of the general populace and the demented feminist propaganda, lots of very young women are hot. There are runway models in their early teens. For most of the history of the species a 13-year-old was ripe to find a mate. The wardrobe and makeup made her looked older in that episode and the 14-year-old boy's role is far more "inappropriate".

reply

LOL, yep.

reply