MovieChat Forums > Clint Eastwood Discussion > The Clint Eastwood/John Wayne Movie That...

The Clint Eastwood/John Wayne Movie That Never Got Made


The movie that never got made with Eastwood and Wayne was from a script called "The Hostiles" by Larry Cohen.

Page 502 of the Scott Eyeman bio of Wayne:

"Shortly after Clint Eastwood made High Plains Drifter in 1973, he optioned ('The Hostiles"), which involved a gambler to be played by Eastwood who wins 50% of ranch owned by an older man(Wayne.) The two men have to become partners , which is complicated by the fact that they can't stand each other. There's a battle coming that will destroy the ranch, so Eastwood, who knows about the situation, sells his half of the ranch back to Wayne, who is innocent of the underlying situation. At the last minute, Eastwood returns to help the older man fight off the hostiles."

Sounds interesting. But Wayne kept turning Eastwood down -- finally throwing a copy of the script off his yacht and into the ocean.

Wayne evidently didn't much like High Plains Drifter and Eastwood's "R-rated" take on the West.

Too bad. Sounds like The Hostiles could have been a good movie. But a lot of good movies never get made. Wayne also killed the original 1971 proposed version of "Lonesome Dove," to be directed by Peter Bogdanovich, which would have put Wayne, James Stewart and Henry Fonda into the roles played by Robert Duvall, Tommy Lee Jones, and Robert Urichin the 1989 mini-series FINALLY made from the book that the screenplay turned into . Interesting: Stewart and Fonda said they would do Lonesome Dove in 1971, but without Wayne, the studio would not finance.

reply

Wayne acted like he had a copyright on how the West should be depicted.

reply

The script was actually filmed, but not until 2009 under the title, "The Gambler, The Girl and The Gunslinger" with the disappointing by comparison Dean Cain in the Eastwood role and someone named James Tupper in the John Wayne role.

https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/why-john-wayne-turned-down-the-chance-to-work-with-clint-eastwood.html/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gambler,_the_Girl_and_the_Gunslinger

It ended up as an instantly forgettable B-grade direct to video film that would have been the ultimate Western classic if Wayne had agreed to star in it with Eastwood.

reply

I am glad it didn't get made.

These two icons of Hollywood masculinity represent different generations and viewpoints.

Mixing the two sounds like fun..but I find it... satisfying and correct..that they never worked together, keeping their filmography separate.

reply

The script was actually filmed, but not until 2009 under the title, "The Gambler, The Girl and The Gunslinger" with the disappointing by comparison Dean Cain in the Eastwood role and someone named James Tupper in the John Wayne role.

https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/why-john-wayne-turned-down-the-chance-to-work-with-clint-eastwood.html/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gambler,_the_Girl_and_the_Gunslinger

It ended up as an instantly forgettable B-grade direct to video film that would have been the ultimate Western classic if Wayne had agreed to star in it with Eastwood.

---

That's very interesting! I was surprised enough to read about the version called "The Hostiles."

I suppose any number of scripts were "intended" for big stars and got made with lessers.

Or with "half the starpower."

For instance, the screenwriters of The Gauntlet(about a cop and a hooker) wrote it for Clint Eastwood and Barbra Streisand to star. Well, they got Eastwood, but they didn't get Streisand. Eastwood took over production and cast his girlfriend Sondra Locke as the hooker.

That said, at least "Streets of Laredo" intended for Wayne, Stewart, and Fonda got made as Lonesome Dove with Duvall, Jones and...Robert Urich?

reply

I am glad it didn't get made.

These two icons of Hollywood masculinity represent different generations and viewpoints.

Mixing the two sounds like fun..but I find it... satisfying and correct..that they never worked together, keeping their filmography separate.

--

I think that is a good viewpoint. Perhaps it was understandable that John Wayne didn't like the kind of Westerns Eastwood was making -- Eastwood was in many ways an "R-rated" movie star, who came to power as the R rating did. And it wasn't just his Westerns. The Dirty Harrys, High Plains Drifter, and Thunderbolt and Lightfoot were pretty rough movies in content.

Wayne was from a different era.

Though I have noted that once Eastwood (and in another vein, The WIld Bunch) came into being, Wayne's OWN Westerns got more violent: Big Jake, The Cowboys and The Shootist for three. Big Jake had a script by some of the writers of Dirty Harry; The Shootist had the DIRECTOR of Dirty Harry.

Back in the 70's I did see an interview where John Wayne was asked "who do you think will take your place" and he rather grudgingly said, "Oh I think this fellow Clint Eastwood looks like a good bet."

reply

I always think about the film City Heat, where a lot of people REALLY wanted to see Burt Reynolds and Clint Eastwood in a film together, and while both were too cool for their britches, it really wasn't the film spectacular that everyone hoped it would be, because someone eventually has to play second fiddle to someone else, and when you have two big A-listers, one of them won't want to be the second fiddle.

I honestly can't imagine John Wayne as a second fiddle to anyone, much in the same way as it's impossible for me to imagine Clint Eastwood as the second fiddle.

reply