MovieChat Forums > Pamela Anderson Discussion > Want to abolish porn? start by changing ...

Want to abolish porn? start by changing your revealing imdb profile pic

posted 8 years ago by sinnerofcinema
12 replies | jump to latest

Porn no longer working for you? I would take this serious if she donated all the money she made from porn to charity and made a public announcement while doing it. And that would be a step in the right direction. But enjoying your riches you made from the same industry you want abolished...well there is only one word for that. Porn was OK when you were young and generatig $$$ from it but not now? How do you spell publicity stunt?

[–] sweiland75 8 years ago

The drugs must have caused serious brain damage. What a hypocrite.

[–] Mint Berry Crunch (345) 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] oregonziggy 8 years ago

No kidding she would have to give back every penny she earned. All her money came from her totally nude or wearing barely anything. If she didn't get giant boobs and pose nude and have a sex tape, she would be nothing.
She is typical of women even that I know pushing 50, they are no longer able to get Attention with there bodies and they want to punish men because we enjoy naked younger women.

[–] R_Kane (15828) 6 years ago

Sadly, they don’t enjoy you.

[–] Cornholio999 8 years ago

She says porn is ruining our country and then precedes to get naked in her new movie, The People Garden. ????? Such a F-ing hypocrite.

[–] sweiland75 8 years ago

Nudity itself is not inherently sexual let alone pornographic.

[–] R_Kane (15828) 6 years ago

No, it’s not. I don’t know of any porn project that she has done. Baywatch? Barb Wire? Playboy? Not porn!

Seem to be a lotta wanking prudes on this topic.

[–] Ghaleon (606) 6 years ago

It's debatable that some Playboy content could be classified as softcore pornography.

[–] tbone382001 (218) 6 years ago

I agree Kane. What porn has she done? Taking naked pictures isn't porn. Not even close IMO. There has been thousands of models/actresses that have taken nudes in their career. Doing a sex act on film is totally different.

[–] [deleted] 6 years ago

I always assumed Playboy was porn.

But I'm no expert, so forgive my ignorance.

[–] R_Kane (15828) 5 years ago

If nudity is pornography, then start smashing Michelangelo’s statues. I mean, damn, the human body is the most beautiful material thing in Creation, to me, and I know it is to many other folks as well. Pam did nudity, not even erotica, and certainly not any hardcore; at least, not for money. The sex tape was for fun.

It’s no coincidence that “prune” and “prude” sound so much alike.

[–] CupidDeLocke (277) 5 years ago

She never said she wanted to abolish all porn. She just called for better sex and less misogyny in porn. Therefore, she’s not hypocritical in this area.