MovieChat Forums > Kirk Douglas Discussion > Lots of negative stuff out there about D...

Lots of negative stuff out there about Douglas ... out now because of Natalie Wood's sister's book


Kirk Douglas died at 103. He was a sexual predator and possible brutal rapist (of Natalie Wood and others), possible murderer (Jean Spangler) Death does not erase crimes. Douglas should be studied- not celebrated because he was a film star.
https://thelifeandtimesofhollywood.com/kirk-douglas-died-at-103-he-was-a-sexual-predator-and-possible-brutal-rapist-of-natalie-wood-and-others-death-does-not-erase-crimes-douglas-should-be-studied-not-celebrated-because-he-was-a-film/


“I’m a sonofabitch, plain and simple,” he admitted in his 1988 autobiography, “The Ragman’s Son.”

reply

“I’m a sonofabitch, plain and simple,” he admitted in his 1988 autobiography, “The Ragman’s Son.”

My favourite quote about Kirk Douglas came from Burt Lancaster, who worked with him several times; "'Kirk would be the first to tell you that he is a very difficult man. And I would be the second."

reply

LOL, or as Burt would say it a-hahahahahahahahahahahaha

https://youtu.be/m3P3twHB9jc?t=49
https://youtu.be/m3P3twHB9jc?t=126

On a more serious note, Burt was an interesting man
https://youtu.be/v4fP5i1-PoA?t=86

reply

I'm glad Lana finally spoke up, one way or the other. Douglas was believed to have been Natalie's rapist forever it seemed, and it wouldn't be fair to his legacy if she didn't clear him if he was innocent.

I don't know any reason Lana would finger Kirk Douglas for this.

reply

> I don't know any reason Lana would finger Kirk Douglas for this.

Yeah me too. It's not likely anyone would write a book like that just to lie in hopes of making money as some of the right-wing loudmouths seem to pipe up accusing.

#MeToo seems to point out that the faster these accusations come out the better, but money is made by mythologizing people, and erasing their warts, and crimes.

reply


The point is, why would she finger Douglas particularly and let the real rapist go unidentified?


#MeToo seems to point out that the faster these accusations come out the better, but money is made by mythologizing people, and erasing their warts, and crimes.


This seems to have been known for 60 years according to Hollywood insiders. The accusation against Douglas occurred long before meetoo and Lana Wood said years ago she wouldn't identify the rapist until after he died.


reply

If you look up the 2004 miniseries, The Mystery Of Natalie Wood on this site, which Lana Wood co-produced and Natalie's biographer, Suzanne Finstad, who was the first to mention the rape in her 2001 book on Natalie served as an executive producer on, there are discussions about the rapist's identity, because her attacker was given a pseudonym in the miniseries in order to avoid a lawsuit (as Kirk Douglas was still living at the time). Many people (including myself) concluded that it was Douglas early on.

reply

What's interesting is Kirk's son Michael's single comment after the book named his dad as the rapist: "May they both rest in peace."

If someone accused my dad of rape and I believed it was a false accusation for a book, I would have said so much more than that. On the other hand, if I knew it was true or strongly believed the accusation had merit, I would have said nothing or my comment would have been similar to Michael's.

My *guess* is that Michael believed the story, was a bit ashamed of his dad, and his comment was worded intentionally to hint it might be true without actually saying it.

reply

Why give credibility to the claim by saying "so much more"? There is no evidence and the claim is made a publicity seeking never-was.

reply


There is no evidence to win a trial now that's true. The way the story was told since she was raped was that her own mother covered it up and it was Douglas. But people in Hollywood have "known" (read that as believed) it was Douglas. If I'm on the jury, he would have walked because there wasn't enough evidence to convict if Natalie and her mom refused to go to authorities.

I think a better comment from Michael *if* he thought the charge was ridiculous would have been "I won't dignify that with a comment".

The comment he made was that he didn't want to comment at all but didn't want to defend what he thought did occur.

reply

Michael Douglas has been accused of sexual misconduct as well, so I'm not surprised he didn't address it.

reply

And a leftist asshole brings politics into a non-political thread.

reply

You're the A****** trying to deny there is a divide and then namecall.

reply

The "divide" is not part of this discussion, leftist.

reply

Thanks for the compliment.

reply

If you possessed critical thinking, you'd know it wasn't a compliment.

reply

If your comments ever reflected anywhere close to reality I might be worried.

reply

Again, If you possessed critical thinking, you wouldn't say the things you say. Run along, leftist.

reply

Why now of all times? Just seems so weird. Was it because she's selling a book and needed some scandalous clickbait info so the media can pick it up? Remember, these are just allegations and all is innocent until proven guilty. I don't know much about Spartacus's past behavior only that he did that famous movie and some others as well.

reply


There's no doubt Natalie was raped by a Hollywood star, that much is a fact. Lana Wood said after Natalie's death that she knew who the rapist was but wouldn't reveal his name until he died, which answers the "why now" part of your question.

It's true that this is all hearsay, but I don't know why Lana would finger Douglas if he wasn't the rapist. Seems to me she could have made money on a book years ago by naming the real rapist if it was someone other than Douglas. I'm inclined to believe her although if I'm on the jury, I wouldn't convict him because there's no physical evidence.

reply

Do we have any proof of the rape other than Lana's second-hand report? Did Natalie talk about being raped as a teen, during her short lifetime? Did she put the story on record? Because it seems like these stories where everyone's got an opinion, but nobody has any proof of anything. Which means that everyone is free to assume whatever it is they want to assume, without evidence.

Which is why I'm not taking sides. I've got my opinion and assumptions, as everyone here does, but none of us have any proof of a damn thing.

reply


My understanding is that a biography on Natalie described the rape before Lana went with it. I didn't read the biography but I'm *pretty* sure that it contains the story.

reply

Since you didn't read (or at least skim) Natalie's biography then you heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend. You are generally more well-reasoned than this.

reply

What particular biography are you referring to?

reply


https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/51234140-natalie-wood

It was published before Lana Wood's book.

To be fair, it's been said that Wood was raped and it was a known "secret" in Hollywood for decades, but I haven't found any evidence that she told anyone else except Lana, but also to be fair, I haven't spent all that much time looking. Whether the biography I linked has comments from others in Hollywood going back these decades and preceding Lana's accusation I honestly don't know. I certainly wasn't privy to any of this.

Maybe someone has read the biography and can tell us whether any one else knew about the rape other than Lana.



reply

"known "secret" means rumor and innuendo.

I understand where you are coming from, but Lana Wood's word without credible collaboration means nothing.

When did this "known secret' emerge is a valid question. Was it around at the time or one those known secrets that was whispered decades later?

Like you, I am not going to do a deep dive into this subject, which would mean reading a lot of sources.

My belabored point is there is a lot of "authoritative " discussion of something no one on this forum has any actual knowledge of. The OP (by one of the usual know-it-alls) accuses Douglas of a murder he was cleared of.

reply


I agree. Like everyone else, I've heard that Natalie's rape was a "known secret" in Hollywood, but if she only told Lana, and Lana is the only person who said anything only a few years ago, then the whole story is up in the air.

reply

I feel bad for his son and his grandchildren. How'd you react if you find out someone in the family is a rapist?

reply

I'd guess they would know. I feel bad for his fans, like I do for all of us when we get a glimpse behind the artificial umbrella of PR and marketing disinformation about the people we all have been thinking so much of. Do the big shots in our culture have to hide what they are lest everyone else get they idea to be abusers, exploiters, extortionists or rapists? Is that what the world really is, and if so the more we hide it the less we come to terms with it.

reply

I know I would be pissed if someone called my grandfather a rapist in the hopes of making money off his name.

reply

Even if it was true?

reply

Especially if it is not true. The only person accusing him is a money grubbing bitch who will say anything to make a buck.

reply

Money-grubbing is no proof of that his accuser is lying, and neither is being a bitch.

Frankly, there's no proof either way, of guilt or innocence.

reply

It's a bit late to do anything about it now, unless you want to dig up his corpse and HANG it, as the English did to Oliver Cromwell after the Restoration of the Monarchy?

reply

[deleted]

Someone mentioned his first autobiography, The Ragman's Son. Douglas himself was sexually assaulted as a child, but unfortunately, he didn't see it for what it was, because he was conditioned into thinking he was "lucky" to have that experience.

There are also some disturbing passages, including:


In Chapter 12 "Israel", Douglas meets General Moshe Dayan and his family, including his "precocious" TWELVE year-old daughter, Ya'el. The following paragraph is reproduced in full:
"Ya'el was a very bright girl, sexy even at that young age. Jokingly, I said, 'Listen, Ya'el, here's a dime. When you get to be seventeen or eighteen, if you're around Hollywood, call me.' Sure enough, about five or six years later, I got a call in Los Angeles. It was Ya'el Dayan. 'Well, here I am.' Israelis are amazing people."

*In Chapter 19 "Stateside", Douglas describes his after-filming activities in Jamaica thus:
"There were beautiful, young (I hate to think how young) copper-colored girls dancing and singing Calypso songs - 'Please, mister, don't touch my tomatoes'. Afterward, I would take them up to my bungalow. I'm glad I never asked them how old they were. I think I should have been in jail."

His engagement to Pier Angeli in the early 1950s (she was 19 when they met, but he loved the fact that she looked younger), is also disturbing to read about. He referred her to as "a virginal child" and he ended their engagement when he realized that she was not going to have sex with him before marriage.

There is also a much-talked-about episode where he bragged about using sex to punish and degrade an anti-Semitic woman.

He had a lot of anger issues, and I absolutely believe that he assaulted Natalie Wood, and he probably did it to others too. As for the disappearance of Jean Spangler, there are a lot of theories and a few other plausible suspects (such as her ex-husband) but I think it's possible that Douglas knew more than he admitted.

reply

I read his autobiography years and years and years ago. I don't remember any details at this point, but even though he was doing this damndest to present himself in the best possible light, he still came across as an asshole. Someone who had a hard upbringing, dirt poor and with the usual family issues, but also someone who never lost the resulting chip on his shoulder no matter how wealthy, famous, and respected he became. The sort of person who spends his life complaining that others don't respect him as much as he deserves, while treating everyone else like shit.

That was years before the rape allegations began. And having read the book, I didn't react to the allegations with the kind of "He couldn't have!" feeling you get about some people.

reply

Well, Douglas is dead and gone now, so I guess the question is how does the world handle this today and going forward.

I've always thought that sex is a natural urge that, despite denials by society even children have. I remember being very attracted to girls my age as you as when I was in first grade, and they attracted back to me.

The issue is coercion, or force which is should be up to the woman, or girl, or maybe even her parents to decide. It's too complicated a subject that humans do not really understand themselves and will probably always argue about.

But the artificial cutoff point of 18, adulthood is a poor decision, but the best we can do.

Having been exposed to feminist through and literature starting in my mid-teens, I get the ideas and theories. Seems to me as a socialist the best we should be able to do it is to remove the coercive necessity for women around the world to have to sell themselves for sex by human right ... but also the necessity for men, all people, to have to be economically exploited in order to survive. That is a dehumanizing, barbaric system that has been the norm in human society since forever, and if we are to count ourselves as "intelligent beings", and "human" we need to change that.

The problem is that we are just as addicted to using each other as we are to using drugs or other mind changing experiences like war and violence.

Humanity has a long way to go, but it doesn't look like we are going to have time because global warming is going to curtail civilization and reset life on this planet very soon.

Oh, yeah, I know "global warming is BS" ... but only for blind Republicans

reply

Lana Wood is a mental case who desperately tries to hang on to her tiny slice of notoriety by making asinine claims about people like Robert Wagner and Kirk Douglas. She seems to have suffered somehow from all the attention her sister got, while she herself couldn't achieve stardom or even a solid supporting actress career. Her main talent was showing off her spectacular breasts which, sadly, are no longer fun to look at. I feel sorry for her, but no rational person who has been aware of her crazy rantings for the past thirty years can take her seriously.

reply

YIKES.

reply

Robert Wagner was named as a person of interest in the re-opened investigation into Natalie's death (and contrary to what has been stated, he has not been "cleared" - the lead detective on the case retired) and that had nothing to do with Lana. As I have previously stated, this first came up in 2001, when biographer Suzanne Finstad interviewed Natalie's friends from her teenage years (two of whom have no involvement in the entertainment industry) and confirmed that Natalie told them about the rape after it happened and they all said it was the same actor-producer. Because Douglas was still living at the time, Finstad did not name him for fear of a lawsuit, but she dropped several clues as to his identity, and it wasn't hard to figure out that it was Kirk Douglas, and this was long before Lana said anything.

reply

The case was reopened three times. Wagner cooperated each time except the last one. That's when he finally said he would talk through his lawyer. Can't blame the guy. It must be frustrating. Each time the conclusion was the same: "No evidence of wrongdoing".
And YES this last time they did clear him:
https://pagesix.com/2022/05/27/robert-wagner-cleared-as-natalie-wood-case-goes-cold/

reply

The subject never came up that Lana Wood didn't defame Robert Wagner. Natalie Wood is hardly the first drunk to fall off a boat (or a dock) and drown.

reply

When the autopsy report was re-examined, it was concluded that the injuries (bruising, etc) that Natalie suffered were consistent with a struggle, not accidental drowning. Lana did not defame him, this was already public knowledge, as per the LASD. And, once again, Wagner has not been officially cleared. The current detectives' decision not to pursue the case further (at least as of now) does not mean that Wagner is innocent. Just because they were not able to charge him does not mean he is cleared, nor does it change that he is the one and only person of interest in this case. It was being investigated as a homicide, and it still remains open, but inactive as of now. Many people don't end up being charged, but that doesn't mean they didn't commit the crime. He was still the last person to see her alive and refused to cooperate with the re-opened investigation, and every few years, there was always a new excuse as to why. First, it was he had "fully cooperated for over 30 years" (speaking to detectives in 1981 does not mean cooperating for over 30 years), then it was "they (the investigators) never tried to contact him" (B.S. it was stated they tried to talk to him multiple times since the re-opening of the case) and the latest one is "he has dementia and doesn't have a clear memory of events that night" (which is ridiculous when he was interviewed for Natalie's daughter's documentary after this, and dementia affects the short-term memory more than anything). Just excuses, and pathetic ones at that.


https://radaronline.com/p/robert-wagner-natalie-wood-death-cold-case-investigation/?fbclid=IwAR1rbeX3ORKHQPsMCgIDFM4a-mWglc7

https://radaronline.com/p/robert-wagner-natalie-wood-death-retired-detective-cold-case/?fbclid=IwAR2rAJK4uy-eeJJCXJ-n9fBAHjuNTaarIIfZo-18rxsWr7mbZcNxV8TS1Mk



reply

Conspiracy nuts are amusing. LOL

reply

I love how the conspiracy nuts only use fringe "news" sites and never the MSM.

reply

Direct quotes (on one of the links) from one of the lead detectives is a conspiracy theory?

reply

The rape stories are nothing new and date back to the early 1960s. There was a story from overseas. Some Euro nation while filming The Heroes of Telemark, with Michael Douglas in tow, there was claims of rape for a young woman, an extra, a local.

Same with Paris brûle-t-il? a Euro production co starring. Sexual misconduct. Minor.

There was stories that we has a complete psychopath.

It was kosher with underage sex back then but c'mon.

reply

The rape stories are nothing new and date back to the early 1960s.


That's what we are told, but is there any published story back then that would confirm that Natalie Wood was raped? We've all heard (blind items at least) that she was raped, but when was all this known if at all?

reply

In the 1950s, how many sexual assaults do you think were reported, especially in Hollywood?

Several people confirmed when they were interviewed for Suzanne Finstad's 2001 biography of Natalie that she told them about the rape after it happened and the identity of the perpetrator, and they all said it was the same actor/producer.

reply

Several people confirmed when they were interviewed for Suzanne Finstad's 2001 biography of Natalie that she told them about the rape after it happened and the identity of the perpetrator, and they all said it was the same actor/producer.


If it's verified that she told people (beside Lana) after the fact, they we can agree that the rape unfortunately happened.

I didn't read the bio so I ask - did the people interviewed name the actor/producer by name?

reply

The people interviewed did, but Suzanne Finstad (who is also an attorney) didn't name Douglas in the book, as she didn't want to be sued, and he was of course, still living at the time. She dropped several clues that pointed to his identity, and it wasn't difficult to figure out that it was him.

"Though her five close friends' memories of some details or timing differ after forty-five years, the essence of what each recalls Natalie confiding to them is the same: that the same married film star lured or tricked Natalie, raped her so brutally she was physically injured, and she was too frightened or intimidated to report it to the police. Natalie "hated" her former screen idol afterward, "shuddering" if she heard his name. She would keep the horrible secret, and behave as if nothing happened whenever their paths intersected, too schooled by Mud [her mother] in the politics of Hollywood to cross a powerful movie star."

reply

If she had sources and named them, how could she be sued, at least successfully?

Since Douglas is dead why hasn't Suzanne Finstad named him?

reply

Lana Wood did name him, so why would Finstad do it?

reply

Because according to you Finstad has credible evidence of the claim. Lana does not.

Also she could print an updated edition of her book which names him and makes more $$$. That is a good reason.

reply

Finstad has published an updated version (which I haven't read yet), but that was before Douglas died. "The Mystery Of Natalie Wood" (2004) was largely based on Finstad's book, (she was the executive producer, while Lana was co-producer),it featured an interview with one of Natalie's friends who knew about the rape (at least four more of her friends knew as well). Lana was quoted as saying around 2004 that she would name Natalie's attacker after he died. Obviously, she knew who it was at the time, just as Finstad did when she learned about it from Natalie's friends, and this was long before the #Metoo movement. Why would anyone want to frame Kirk Douglas?

reply