Would you eat a Lobster?
Lobsters are sea cockroaches. You wouldn't eat a cockroach would you?
Of course not.
Now put down the lobsters, you sick demented food freakz.
Lobsters are sea cockroaches. You wouldn't eat a cockroach would you?
Of course not.
Now put down the lobsters, you sick demented food freakz.
If a cockroach had as much meat as a lobster maybe?
Not a huge fan of lobster as I don't really live close to the ocean, and it seems to me that here in redneckland that lobster seems to be mostly a method to eat garlic butter without too much guilt.
LOL I would probably eat them too.
Cockroaches just need to be re-branded as "land lobsters" and served with garlic butter or tarter sauce and suddenly we'll all be chomping 'em down and willing to pay lobster prices for them.
Probably. I know there are a few places in the world where cockroaches are considered good eats. They certainly are abundant in many places as well, so it could help with food shortages.
When you really think about a lot of the food we eat....it's pretty gross.
Me the one and only time I ate lobster: 🛌🤢🤢🤢🚽🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🛌🕕🕐🕝 🤢🤢🚽🤮🤮🤮
shareYes, certainly.
I love Lobster with butter and or Lemon.
I like most saltwater seafood, YUM!
Delicious, but it is the addition of drawn/clarified butter than makes it a superb treat.
shareHonestly, they don't taste like much. When they were the cheap food of the poor then yeah, it used to be bland protein for people who couldn't afford meat, but hell no the taste isn't worth a bucket of money!
There was a bit in "Little Women" that amuses me to this day: Amy wants to have her friends over for dinner, even though her family doesn't have enough money to host fancy dinners, but they splurge for once and buy a chicken! And then the plans fall through, and when the dinner is rescheduled they can't afford a second chicken... so they have to buy lobsters. Yes, in the 1860s, lobster was cheaper than chicken.