MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > What's the take in the commonwealth & UK...

What's the take in the commonwealth & UK, of course, on King Charles


Seems like an affable twit to me, but that's at a far remove.

What's yours ?

reply

I have always liked Charles and I'm quite happy for Australia to have him as its Head of State. Others don't agree and I expect the current Labor Government led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ( Italian-Australian ) to push for Australia to become a republic sooner rather than later.

reply

As a Canadian, I don't want Canada to do it either. I think it's great that we all have ties to Commonwealth countries in case it turns to shit, we have other counties having our back.

reply

I'm keen on the Anglo-sphere ( Britain, Ireland, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand ) but not so much on the Commonwealth.

reply

I'd like to see CANZUK happen.

reply

So CANZUK is Canada, the UK, Australia and New Zealand. I've never heard the term before.

But add the U.S. and Ireland and somewhat South Africa and you have the whole English-speaking world.

reply

CANZUK is a proposed alliance comprising Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom as part of an international organisation or confederation similar in scope to the former European Economic Community. This includes increased trade, foreign policy co-operation, military co-operation and mobility of citizens between the four states, tied together by similar economic systems, social values and political and legal systems, in addition to speaking English.

https://www.canzukinternational.com
The official YouTube channel has informative videos too, I'm not sure how well known it is I've never heard the average Joe talk about CANZUK.
https://youtu.be/lW-14XOTKdM

I may repost this in the politics forum sometime as I know there are many posters from those nations at MC.

reply

I'm not sure why it's needed while there's a Commonwealth.

reply

As a Brit I hope ties will strengthen with the commonwealth countries since leaving the EU. Charles III is head of that now too, but it’s not guaranteed a British Monarch will be after him.

reply

Well even countries which were not former British colonies have joined the Commonwealth - like Mozambique which was Portuguese. So the Commonwealth has cache.

Don't you think Charles' son William would be a more popular king?

reply

William and Kate are far more popular than Charles according to opinion polls, and have been for years, UK and the Commonwealth would benefit with a younger king, one that is popular with the people and a good role model.

reply

He & Kate seem to have kept their noses absolutely spotless.

There are retrospectives & perspectives on Charles today, giving him a lot of props for rehabbing his image & underlying persona - with the caveat that he may not be able to resist poking his nose in, where Elizabeth held her reserve :

(From Washington Post)
LONDON β€” What sort of King will Charles III be? As he delivers his first speech on Friday, the world is watching to see.

Different from mum. That’s almost certain.

Charles has opinions. He expresses them. He’s 73. He may not be able to turn it off. The heir has spent a lifetime promoting his views. He has established princely think tanks and foundations and trusts to do so β€” to promote β€œholistic solutions to the challenges facing the world today.”

He has deep thoughts on fast fashion, hedgerows, parking garages and organic tomatoes.

Charles has conceded that as king, he will have to express his views less openly and often β€” but his biographers don’t quite believe this is fully possible.

Once dismissed as a nutter by his critics, because he confessed he talks to trees, Charles is right on time for 2022.

He was a rock star at last year’s COP26 climate summit in Glasgow. He is ardent. He believes the planet is going to hell while the world’s governments fiddle.

Charles could be an ecological warrior-king in a Savile Row suit.

β€œHe will be a different sort of monarch. Charles is a deep thinker, romantic, sentimentalist,” said Robert Hardman, a royal biographer, author of β€œQueen of Our Times.”

Political neutrality is often understood essential for the monarchy and its survival in modern times. But in Robert Jobson’s 2018 biography, β€œKing Charles: The Man, the Monarch, and the Future of Britain,” the author describes a person who may want very much to β€œlead as monarch, not just follow.”

reply

Interesting point. If Charles emerges as an advocate for green policies and environmentalism, it will give him relevance.

reply

However, you can assume Charles might live another 15 to 20 years.

reply

i would prefer canada to become a republic. having a foreigner as head of state is embarrassing at this point.

reply

I find the commonwealth an odd concept too. I think it's kind of meant to keep the peace between nations but it does seem redundant these days.

reply

Charles has a bit of a rep as an odd duck, very much concerned with boutique issues, is he not ? My impression is very surface, based upon a few conversations, a few news stories over the years. He may be, in fact, far more substantial than I have given him credit for, I don't know. Which is why am asking those closer to the British scene.

reply

He's very passionate about conservation. He used to be very off-ish and unrelatable but he seems to have mellowed the last couple of decades.

I think he will take the job as seriously as his mother did.

reply

He's had a penchant in the past for writing letters to various figures in government, expressing his opinions and making suggestions on a number of matters. Obviously, that's a no-no for the monarch, but he's said he won't do that as King. His heart seems to be in the right place. His loves (other than Camilla!) are conservationism and architecture. He's done some dumb things in the past (e.g. accepting large charitable cash donations in plastic shopping bags), but I think he'll want to honour his mother's legacy and do right by her. With the right advisors I think he'll do a good job (I'm a Brit, by the way).

reply



He's a bit of a crank. But he's only the King, so it doesn't matter that much. He's just a figurehead.

You get a crank as prime minister -- and we've had a few of those too -- and it's a whole different ballgame.

reply

Luckily, here in the states, we have been crank-free - just sterling gents from start to the present. Its just a shame there isn't room on Mt. Rushmore for them all.

reply

Ha. Yes. Quite right.

reply

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

reply

I think he’ll do a fine job.

reply