Do you think that the Beatles would have sounded more like Wings if they had stayed together?

Largely because it was Paul working with inferior musicians and with no one willing to stand up to him and tell him when something wasn't working. And Wings didn't suck. Of course it wasn't as good as the Beatles, what is? I'm just saying Paul had a strong personality in the group in the later days. John had given up control of the group and Paul had seized it. Not to say that he was an iron leader. George often wouldn't agree with him, but largely would do whatever he wanted to keep the peace. John didn't want to do Get Back but went along with it anyway. Ringo seemed to support and care for the other three. I think that Ringo was the glue to this group. All of them got along with Ringo, even after the breakup. George wouldn't work with Paul, Paul wouldn't work with John, but they all would contribute to Ringo's albums. And what how many times did even George work with with John, like one album? So a lot of factors could have changed the sound to a largely McCartney flavor.