MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Is It Best To Watch Movies Alone?

Is It Best To Watch Movies Alone?


A first viewing anyway.. I would say yes, for me, anyway. I'm easily distracted with another person, and there's always going to be a tiny bit of talking, and maybe extra pausing. I think I'd miss more.

However, I wish I was around during the 1930-70s to see some of my favorites with an audience on the day a movie premiered to catch the audience response. The last few times I went to a theater, it was noisy, cell phones, husbands explaining a movie to their wife, programmed laughter, domino effect.

I see "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest" and if I could, it would be cool to see who would show up, and then observe the behavior. I hope some younger people check it out on the bigger screen.

reply

Yes. People talk too much.

reply

They never shut up

reply

I had someone walk into the room when I was watching a film that they had seen the day before and they said, "wasn't that car crash scene crazy? I didn't think they'd kill him off." I didn't even get to that part yet.

reply

Unforgivable!! πŸ˜ƒ

reply

I agree, talking during a movie I’m watching for the first time is a pet peeve of mine.

reply

I hate when they've seen the movie so many times before and I'm watching it for the first time and they're saying the lines simultaneously while the movie plays.

reply

That would push me over the edge πŸ˜‚ I would excuse myself and watch it some other time.

reply

I like to watch movies I've been looking forward too by myself but really bad, campy crap is lots of fun to watch with a crowd

reply

Agree.

The last handful of times I saw a movie with someone was because there's no way they could have found it, and it was cool to see their reaction and answer any questions they had.

reply

Well, if I have to squirt (cry) I'd rather be unwitnessed.

reply

Lol, glad you clarified squirting there ny πŸ˜‚

reply

I did not behave too well when I watched the Matrix with my wife.

Just one example:
When Smith has Morpheus tied to a chair, while remembering his 'cataloguing the Earth's life', Smith describes humanity as "... consuming every resource..."... I gasped and blurted out "virus".

I like watching movies with my wife and I know that she is legally required to assert the same but, and I do apologise, there are about 20 people whom will never watch any movie, in any theatre, ever again... because of me.

reply

I watch a lot of films with my daughters and we have a rule of no cell phones, so it’s great. My wife and I have completely opposite taste in films, therefore we don’t watch many together. I would say 95 % of the time I watch alone and I enjoy them best that way.

reply

There more interesting to watch alone, if your stoned, drunk or both lol.

reply

Depends on the person. Some will sit quietly and it's like they aren't there anyway. The ones I hate are the ones who pass judgement as if what is happening is real. "Oh how can they do that, that's disgusting! What do you think?"

I think it's a film and in order for the story to play out they act that way because they are the villain.

I don't go to cinema's though because I don't want to be bothered by people's talking and cell phone lights and getting up and down to go to the snack bar and toilet etc.

reply

I agree... I think missing even a few seconds can be detrimental. Also the constant interruptions screw everything up. You go into it wanting to watch a movie and shortly end up hating all those idiots and when you're out of the rabbit hole of thought, the movie is over.

reply

For sure, I like a lot of old movies and dialogue is critical, if you miss a few seconds you can be lost or not enjoy the film as much. I like to be really engrossed in a film, to be lost in it. So distractions just piss me off.

reply

Wow, you said something that led me to remember what I forgot to say earlier.

You don't need to be "totally there" to watch a movie today. A little boy could understand them. Lowest common denominator.

Every time I have this conversation, the contrarians will say, "Well, you gotta search hard" or "Avoid commercial movies" (they say the same thing about music - don't turn on the radio, lol). There was a time in this country (and others) where commercial movies could be independent -- a triumph for great taste.

I just looked and a majority of the movies I've seen in the last few months were made in my lifetime, and the one movie that was good was "Paradise: Love" and I praised it more than the great older movies I saw in that time span because I grade the last 40 years of movies on a curve. If it isn't shit, I even handicap it and add an extra point on my 1-10 scale.

We can only dedicate so much time watching movies considering our limited time. I prefer to go with the best probabilities. I wish there were better movies. I'd never deny myself pleasure, and I've lived through the 80s on, but oddly relate even less. "I, Daniel Blake" was a pretty good movie to critique the modern world, but of course, the director, Ken Loach, started in the 1960s... I wish each movie was unique, and will admit most of Loach's movies are critiques of capitalism and wish he would dig a little deeper. Mike Leigh is another English director who is still working, and also started long ago, but his movies are more diverse. They and Aki Kaurismaki are the only living directors whose works I will always see.

reply

Modern films are forgettable, sometimes you forget them before they even finish! A lot of them like the Transformer films for example are like extended music videos. Just a huge montage of scenes without substance.

They are simple and part of that I think is to get the non English speaking world into them to make more money. As well as to entertain people with short attention spans in general. Oddly enough some of these films run way too long. But that is another thread.

I agree, "Commercial" is a broad term or at least used to be. Commercial doesn't have to mean crap just as "art house" doesn't mean it is a work of art or edgy.

I would describe the first Terminator film as having a very low budget/gritty feel to it yet it was still commercial as one example.

I'm not willing to watch every film or give a shit film a chance to the end either. I will turn off within 15 minutes if I think a film is crap. I don't have time for it.

reply

I agree 100%... It is curious that some of those movies are very long.

I never saw "Terminator" but with Arnold in it, and a trailer (I'm guessing that had a lot of special effects) that it would target many, and then you'd get word of mouth. I'm trying to think of a low-budget that had no stars and got big organically.

I never thought about appealing to other countries.. Now I have another argument up my sleeve...

I used to watch movies all the way through, but now I have enough self-awareness when to cut my losses and turn it off.

reply

Arnie had really only made the Conan films before Terminator asides from B graders. So at that point I don't think he was a huge star yet but I was just a kid when it came out.

It had a budget of 6.4 million so probably way bigger than many indie films made $78.3 million at box office. A huge hit.

I don't recall a huge amount of special effects not compared to Terminator 2 anyway. It really did look more like a low budget sci fi film, something I still love about it.

I think Blair Witch and perhaps Saw maybe would qualify?

At best I will fast forward through to see if anything gets better but I can tell early on if I will like the film or not. I don't know the technical terms but I can tell even before anything happens, just the look of a film, the vibe I pick up from it. Most times I am right, sometimes I do get surprised and end up enjoying a film I initially thought would suck.

reply

Yes absolutely

reply