If MJ's accusers are lying, should they be punished?
I heard that there is no penalty for defaming a deceased person.
shareAbsolutely. If it wasn't a crime to frame someone who you know isn't really guilty, it needs to be.
share
MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > If MJ's accusers are lying, should they ...
The latest twist in all this is that a biographer of Jackson's has come forward to point out that one of the accusers got his dates wrong in his claim that he was abused in the train station Jackson had on the ranch complex. The biographer has the construction contracts that show that that particular building on the ranch wasn't built yet during the years that the abuse allegedly happened, and the year the station was built would have placed the boy claiming that as an abuse location as being 16 or 17, though he claimed he was "too old" by 14 when the abuse stopped.
It's not of course impossible to get your years mixed up when recalling events - I'm not saying they have to be lying now that an error in the alleged years stated has come up.
But it's another interesting fact to come up.
https://www.nme.com/news/music/michael-jackson-biographer-exposes-wade-robson-james-safechucks-allegations-false-leaving-neverland-2469413
Personally I just don't know what to think anymore.
I don't know about the first thing, but I read the second, and nowhere in Wade's mother's deposition does she say her "whole family" (meaning, including Wade) left to go on the trip to the Grand Canyon. All she said was "my family." I'd have to see the context of her reply in the last 2 sentence quote from her 2016 depo before I'd be comfortable stating an opinion.
share