Modern cinematic language has become completely unbearable to me.

well it's not exactly new, this new techniques came along in the 70's, and all films have them. Jarring cuts for instance, the camera all over the place in action shots, etc.

yes, exactly, but it is far worse in a film, for instance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d79o09D8cuo look at the insane amount of cuts, specially of cuts of characters that are not relevant to the scene, the so called "reaction cuts", well reaction to whom? These types of cuts just scream I'M THE DIRECTOR, I WANT YOU TO SEE THIS", it's terrible.

Again, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1V728Mx39NU&t=8s insane amount of cuts that scream I'M THE DIRECTOR, LOOK THIS WAY, well why? Why do you have to show something miles away? what is the relevance? the golden rule of golden age hollywood was, if it's not relevant to the story, do not show it, much less make a close up of it.

Another example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUyl9Wmx6Fg Insane amount of cuts to closeups of absolutely redundant action. This is actually not the best example, but if you see this film from the beginning you'll get what I mean.

Another awful technique is the abrupt cuts to denote the passage of time. In the golden age, the passage of time would be conveyed by the dissolving or darkening of the image. Now it's just an abrupt cut that makes it seem like the characters simply teleported to the future.

Mind you, this happens in EVERY SINGLE MOVIE DONE TODAY, and believe it or not, the so called "auteurs" like Nolan, Tarantino, Fincher, are the worst at doing this, and they're films are really bad and nothing compared to golden age to me. Ironically films that were not well received or than weren't made to be "artsy" like Body Of Evidence actually have a much more immersive experience from a cinematographic point of view than garbage Tarantino films.

Now how did I make this discovery? Because growing increasingly disillusioned with modern cinema I completely immersed myself in golden age cinema, and when you go back to watching modern films, you can't, because the cinematic language of today is BAD.

agreed, I used to like Melancholia by Lars Von Trier, and when I tried to see it recently, it was impossible because of the shaky cam.

I'm not sure what I want really, do I want films to be like golden age hollywood? I guess not, that world is gone, I guess what pisses me off is how high and mighty filmmakers and their fans feel today when in fact what they do and like is shit.

Oh, the shaky cam! I actually turn off the movie or show when I discover it's done in shaky-cam. It gives me a headache. It's a little like the kid on a plane, who won't stop kicking the back of your seat - for Pete's sake! Just SETTLE, please! I can't stand the constant movement.

Hitchcock was the greatest film director of all time.

That's not the point, the point is to not notice the camera. You speak of Hitchcock and Orson Welles, I don't know but maybe you haven't seen much golden age films outside of their work. I have been watching golden age films exclusively for almost a year and when you see something modern it is barely watchable because of how terrible and ineffectual the techniques are today, they do nothing for the narrative, they are cheesy and predictable and simply reveal an astonishing lack of talent and understanding of film.

I haven't seen Rope but I read that they are cuts in Rope, just dissimulated. The cuts in the shower scene in Psycho are NOT MTV editing. They were absolutely necessary and magnificent.