I am also reading these books for the first time. Disclaimer: I haven't read any Stephen King books previously (though I have enjoyed movies made from his books); I was interested in these because of the genre.
I am in the middle of the second book, The Drawing of the Three. I read the nonrevised, original version of The Gunslinger. I wanted to see how the original version read.
Do you have the Plume edition, by any chance? After I read the first book, I looked at the copyright information and realized that The Gunslinger had previously appeared in print in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, broken into five chapters (with the same names as in the book) prior to being published collectively as a novel (chapter 1 in 1978, chapter 2 in 1980, and chapters 3, 4 and 5 all in 1981, but in three different magazine issues).
I mention that because for me, while reading the first book, I attributed some of the -- call it anomalies or disjointed qualities -- to King's being a young writer. Later, I realized he must have written this book across a span of years.
I still enjoyed the story, despite what I suppose could be considered the book's flaws.
I find the second one to be more cohesive so far.
I wouldn't call them "page turners" -- the pace is much slower than what I would imagine a typical King horror book would be. Then again, they are nothing like Faulkner, who had one sentence that was two and a half pages long! I lowered my expectations going in due to the mixed reviews I read. But I am finding them oddly enjoyable so far. We'll see how it goes; I plan to read them all as well (maybe not the last one).
reply
share