MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > I just spent 155$ on DVDs and Blurays

I just spent 155$ on DVDs and Blurays


YEah I know, Im crazy for spending so much on a product that will soon be obsolete but what do you want, Im old school like that.

The thing is, 2/3 videoclubs are doing their liquidation sales before closing and it was 10 movies for 30$.

I went on a rampage and found a bunch of treasures.

Still, it was 155$...

Here is a few titles:

Split
Baby Driver
Guardians of the Galaxy 2
Selma
Joyeux Noel
Samsara
Lincoln
Bridge of spies
The NAmesake
The motorcycle Diaries
Ferris Bueller'S day off
Enemy
Trainspotting 2
Sin Nombre
Bad words
Queen of Katwe

reply

10 for $30 is a good deal. Think about the prices we used to pay for a DVD, especially when they first came out. I've been tempted to collect some lately. Everytime I'm in a 2nd hand shop I see so many because no one wants them anymore. Its nice to have a hard copy of a movie though I think.
You got some good movies there, fun. :)

reply

Thanks Daisy! What you say is very true.

reply

Stay away from used discs, Daisy. They could be scratched and would play badly. Hell, they could even be from another country and be incompatible with your disc player, and even with your TV.

reply

Depends on the price if I would take the risk or not I suppose. I remember being in a 2nd hand shop and there was a stranger there trying to haggle for me for buying a CD. That's what he was saying...you might get them home and they might not work.

reply

Wow, thanks for the tip on the sale.

Check it out, if you buy taco t-shirts from tacobell.com there's free shipping on orders over $100 USD. I kid you not.

"Look-- even your Aunt Mary is biting on my couch cushions!"

reply

Gotcha!

reply

That’s quite a haul. I’ve only seen Split, GoG2, Ferris and Bad Words but all were great flicks.

reply

I never bought dvd's.

reply

I never bought Resident Evil

reply

Who does...i download them from net.😉

reply

Illegally yeah. Alice would kick ur ass

reply

I just bit my tongue...

reply


That should keep you occupied for a while, stony.



😎

reply

Oh yeah!

reply

I'm really envious of you right now, StoneKeeper. I'm trying to contain my ugly envy and just be really, really happy for you, but it isn't working. Sigh...

Okay. It's fine. I'm fine now.

I'm happy for you. Some of those are *great* titles and I covet them.

reply

haha, thanks. You should post more on this site my man.

reply

I still buy blu rays too. I have no interest in switching to the inferior format (digital).



reply

It is going to be quite some time--if ever--for the streaming experience to come close to matching the hard media experience in terms of detail, nuance, sound quality--well, in terms of everything, really. There are two sad truths in this discussion: (1) People will take convenience over quality most of the time, because they think that "good enough" is good enough for them. (2) More than 90 percent of the population has never been shown truly high performance in any area, video, audio, autmotive, gustatory, sartorial and so on, so they can't know what they are missing. And these folk are not at fault! It is the retail world that has failed them by not educating them. I can't think of a more short-sighted and lazy industry than US mass-market retail. I work in high-end luxury retail, which is altogether different.

reply

Agreed. People will always choose what's convenient over what's better.

Why did Betamax lose to VHS? It was the better product, yet VHS won in the end.



reply

There were two reasons for Beta's demise (well three).

The first is that the VHS format was always double the length in run/record time. The first Betas were 1 hour, the first VHS was two. Most movies could be contained on one cassette with VHS.

The second reason was that RCA picked VHS for their format. Back in the late 70s, RCA was a powerhouse in consumer electronics and most industry experts agreeded that if RCA went Beta (Zenith did), then Beta would have been the dominant format just on the strength of RCA, Zenith, and Sony all backing that format.

The third reason was simply that once one format took the majority lead, the other would fail.

reply

I agree... Blu ray blows away streaming in terms of quality...

I do use streaming for movie rentals through as there are no blu ray rentals here anymore... I still buy lots of blu rays

reply

Nice. I have scaled back DVD/Blu-ray purchases. Now I pick up the occasional special edition remaster like the upcoming Suspiria release.

reply

You might want to start thinking about buying your special movies on 4K Blu-ray with High Dynamic Range (HDR) and a 4K Blu-ray player that will scale to what I presume is the 1080p resolution of your current TV, because your next TV will be a 4K TV (we will have 8K TVs in a little over a year, when the Olympics [the real Olympics, not the bullshit winter olympics] will be broadcast from Japan), so you may want to make your library as future-proof as possible. Video: it's a fast-moving target.

reply

I have been considering that I am hoping we will start seeing some bluray/UHD combo packs. But I wonder if there will be enough money in it for them to produce UHD discs. Streaming and downloading of films is ever increasing making UHD more of a niche product. Blu Ray is worthwhile because it grew enough. I still don't know anyone around me that owns a UHD player even though some of them have 4K tvs. Hell I was in Walmart one day and was looking at the UHD just to discover even if I wanted to buy it they did not have a 4K player..all they had was blu ray players that would upscale to 4k. I am considering it but I am wondering if standard blu ray is the last legitimate wide release physical media.

reply

[deleted]

But that's Walmart, and they don't stock niche products. I suggest that you look at the Crutchfield and Audio Advisor websites. Also, and I hate to say it, the Best Buy website. Also, the Oppo company site. Oppo makes the world's best Blu-ray players.

reply

I have looked around, probably going get the TV first and decide on either a stand alone or a new Xbox for the UHD.

I just found it amusing they had a small selection of UHD but I would have to go elsewhere to find the player for to watch them. The staff had no clue about the product at all.

Wonder if Xbox will drive adoption of UHD, it’s interesting that the PS4 pro skipped it.

reply

The TV industry is driving the adoption of 4K by not making HD sets any more. No major brand offers an HD set at 40 inches or larger. No one wants them. Best Buy's Black Friday special this year is a 50" Samsung 4K TV for $140--$260 below retail.

reply

Oh i see the 4k transition and the 8k behind it. What I am not so sure about about is the disc adoption. Blu Rays are generally superior to streaming options yet its clear streaming is eating away at the physical media. SO a new format such as this that already behind the 4k content available today really have a chance in the long run..or is it headed to Laserdisc territory. Can the xbox which is certainly a better value as a UHD player make the kind of splash PS3 did for blu ray or is it a format that most people will walk by like people use to when betamax collected dust on store shelves.

reply

I have an xbox one...the image quality is great.

reply

I don't know anyone around me who owns a regular blu ray player... Only a couple of playstation owners... Still hasn't stopped me from stocking up on blu rays...

I'll probably get a UHD disc player in January... After I research which model to get so that I can output properly to my projector...

reply

That’s typically what they have around me an Xbox one, ps4 or ps3. That’s what I have for Blu-ray so I have not sought a separate player.

I might consider the new Xbox since it plays 4K disc but I am unlikely to bother till I get the TV first.

reply

makes sense

reply