MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Assisted suicide popular in Canada

Assisted suicide popular in Canada


Nearly 2000 people have taken advantage since it became legal in June 2016

https://www.yahoo.com/news/canadian-doctors-help-2-000-commit-suicide-212621726.html

reply

Didn't read the article, but i agree with assisted suicide. One thing I think they should change is that if someone has a mental illness, they should still be able to choose the same option. Within reason, you know what I mean.

reply

I just had a close family member who committed suicide less than a month ago. He had other options. He left several heartbroken children behind, not to mention a wife with no life insurance to collect on. Very selfish and self-absorbed.

reply

assisted suicide is for seriously ill people only who are of sound mind

reply

It's just a fancy name for Do-It-Yourself euthanasia.

reply

doctor assisted euthanasia maybe

reply

From what I gather, assisted suicide is where you injected the killing shot yourself, the physicians were just providing it (and of course made the assesments beforehand.)

While euthanasia is where the physician is the one who injected the shot. That's why it's not called a suicide. Euthanasia is always doctor assisted. If the assistant was not a doctor it would be called a murder.

Assisted suicide is like assisted selfie, instead of, say, a studio portrait. Somebody else provided the cameraphone, pick the settings, lighting and maybe the Instagram filter for you, but you pressed the shutter button yourself (This way the copyright is yours and not the camera provider's.)

reply

you are correct - the patient administers the final deadly drugs that are supplied by the doctor usually an anesthesiologist.

reply

In the first place, I was responding to Daisy, not you. I never claimed it was an " assisted suicide . "

In the second place, quite often, seriously ill people are not of sound mind.

And finally, why don't you piss off with your high and mighty, lecturing, condescending attitude?

reply

[deleted]

I was clarifying the Canadian law not commenting on your personal situation. sorry

reply

It's a good thing, I think.

reply

as long as it is not abused I don't have a problem with it.

reply

What do you mean? Are you thinking of an example?

reply

I was thinking of disabled people where it could be abused.

reply

are you talking euthanasia or assisted suicide?

reply

Well euthanasia is not legal as of now and hopefully will never be. Remember all the disabled associations were against the assisted suicide law. I guess they are afraid of the slippery slope.

reply

You're right, it is a very slippery slope and a tough subject for sure.

reply

Next time, put politics aside and think before you post. That came across as just as arrogant as trying to put me on a completely undeserved guilt-trip pertaining to the Las Vegas shooter.

reply

we won't agree on guns but I am sorry to hear about a suicide in your family.

reply

You don't know my opinions on guns so your reaction to me was still extremely arrogant, judgemental and unwarranted.

reply

we had a debate on guns earlier in the week - I pretty sure I am aware of your opinions on guns.

reply

No we didn't ! You tried to incite one and I nipped it in the bud. " Pretty sure ?" You know my mind and heart and experiences with guns and their owners during my life better than I do ?

Like I said, piss off you arrogant creep !

reply

You are sensitive when it comes to guns. Maybe someone hacked your account earlier in the week. You should look into that. Calling people names really drives home your point.

reply

Oh, it's ok for you to call Hugh Hefner a " creep " but not me when it comes to you. Such blatant hypocrisy !

And where is this " hacking " allegation coming from ? Just more obfuscating, creep !

I think you're sensitive to the gun issue because you're subjugated by the Mrs. Back in the day, we referred to that as being " pussy whipped."

reply

I called Hefner a scumbag - he is not a poster here.
The hacking was referring to your comments under the Las Vegas shooting thread where you made your pro gun views well known - there is nothing wrong with that.
I don't understand the Mrs Back reference - please explain.
I thought "pussy whipped'' was when a guy was really into a girl and was controlled by her. What does this have to do with guns ?? Please explain.

reply

You also called him a " creep. " The fact that he's not a poster here is irrelevant. You're fond of accusing members on here of being name-calling.

What I made well known was my heartbreak; check my posting history, creep.

I think you actually grasped the meaning of " pussy whipped . " You conflated Mrs. with " Back. " Now, for the final time, piss off, creep !




reply

Creep/scumbag what's the difference ?? You seem to be confused on the rules of this forum. Please refrain from name calling. Its unbecoming. You really love that 'creep' word - please try to expand your vocabulary at least.

I must admit I probably have been pussy whipped for the last 26 years.

reply

I'm not confused at all. Your admission that you're pussy whipped confirms it. You're really starting to come across as the next thing to a troll. Why don't you just piss off like I've been suggesting ?

reply

calling someone a troll - you have upgraded from creep.

reply

No, I've downgraded, ignoramus !

reply

at least you are expanding your vocabulary - we have accomplished something tonight.

reply

I have to say I do agree with the seriously ill people not always being of sound mind, but I also believe that the mentally ill are not without a sound mind all the time. Think about. Degrees vary.

reply

Oh, no. You are mistaken. I am talking about assisted side and the person is about to die. Instead of making their family sit by their bedside, they are aware and alert when they die. They have a choice over their death. We control our lives, why not our deaths? It is only granted to people who are fit to decide. It can be beautiful with a glass of champagne and a good bye. No one should have to suffer, and no one should have to watch.

Suicide is different. Its so different. It is desperation, unhappiness, depression and isolation all in one. People need help.

reply

[deleted]

I appreciate your empathy, Dazed but I don't consider it a loss. As I already told Catbooks, for me, there was more of a sense of closure and justice. I felt most saddened for his children. Besides being heartbroken, they're bewildered. In addition to the unfair financial burden left to the family, there's that of undeserved guilt for the survivors to grapple with, maybe for the rest of their lives.

In his case, I can't think of any way to justify it. He exhibited extreme selfishness during his adult years and died the way he lived, cowardly. What I can't quite understand is how he evolved into such a despicable person.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I agree with you. It seem ludicrous that someone would not be able to take their own life or have in writing this is their wish if ever something should happen where they felt they would not want to live with the pain anymore. I don't know if its a choice I would make, but no one can say I suppose until they are in that position.

And yes I am terribly sorry for the losses shared here.

reply

I had a brother who lingered on his deathbed for 10 days, basically kept alive by machinery. My mother was so affected by that, she became adamant that she didn't want that kind of an end so we agreed on a Living Will for her. She was completely comfortable with that and I honored it when the time came.

reply

That was great of you to do, but I'm sure hard. Sorry to hear about your loss. :(

reply

As the oldest son in the family, it was just a natural reaction for me to take the lead. Yes it was hard. I handled the deaths of both of my parents alone except for the funeral home staff.

I appreciate the condolence but years have passed and I'm at peace with those losses, knowing I did everything I could to honor them in their deaths.

reply

I'm glad you are at peace and I'm sure you are even more so knowing you followed their wishes with such respect.

reply

It's been legal here in Holland for years. There's a discussion going on about whether it should be legal for those who suffer from severe depression. I'd totally disagree with that.

reply

[deleted]

The doctor of the patient is legally obligated to ask for a second opinion to avoid such abuse. I don't think there's a 100% guarantee, but it's difficult to say how many slip through the cracks. Too many people involved have their own agenda, some say there's abuse, some say there isn't.

I wasn't entirely correct. Technically mental illness is also a legal reason for euthanasia as long as the suffering is considered to be unbearable without any other reasonable solution. But most doctors would not so easily allow euthanasia for those suffering from depression, although it does happen. So the discussion is more an ethical one among doctors.

reply

[deleted]

I agree, mental illness like depression doesn't seem right to me either, especially if it concerns young people. I guess I can somewhat understand the elderly who have no one left and are just done with life, but I feel there has to be a line somewhere.

reply

So the people who....how to say it...kill the most ill and old people are serial killers,right?...and now it's legal?

Death by irony is always painful

reply

the patients kill themselves assisted by a doctor. I agree it is a moral quandary. Some doctors want nothing to do with it.

reply

Allow me to clarify my post...there were cases when nurses or doctors...damn,this english...killed the most ill or old patients with injections and they were called serial killers...the so called "angels of death".

reply

yes they are murderers - that's not the case with the assisted suicide law - at least not yet.

reply

It's the same thing...and now it become legal🤔

reply

the patient is administering the final lethal dose not the doctor

reply

They chanced to roles,i see...but still....

reply

I think its the same in Holland.

reply

I see an irony in this...

reply

what irony ???

reply

The "angels of death" should be released from prisons.

reply

The angels of death are killing people - just because the victims are sick doesn't mean they want to die. The angels of death are making the decision for the sick patient. Under assisted suicide the sick patient is making the decision in consultation with family/ medical and legal experts.

reply

[deleted]

Well,the so called..."angel of death"think that the patient can't choose on their own,so they...take away their pain...damn, this english...

reply

[deleted]


And you're telling us this because.......?



😎



"I Am the FBI."

reply

I thought it was interesting because it was a new law.



reply

Too bad Stephen Paddock never went north for that procedure.

reply

This is extremely morbid. Does the conversation go like this?

Doctor: Are you having thoughts of harming yourself or others?

Patient: I've been thinking of killing myself because life is unbearable for me.

Doctor: Here are a few numbers for organizations that will help you end your life if that's what you want. They also help you plan your funeral.

Patient: That's exactly what I need. Thanks doc!

reply

I doubt the patient can harm others when he/she most likely are suffering from end stage cancer or advanced ALS. They may no longer be able to harm themselves for that matter except for starvation.

reply

Would taking a critical condition patient off of life support count as assisted suicide. For example, if the patient has been in a coma for so long with no sign of improvements?

I would also find this a bit understandable in the case of terminal cancer and that the patient/family would personally be ok with this option. It's still a tough subject.

Also, why am I not too surprised to find a lot of retarded yahoo comments posted under that article?

reply

[deleted]

I agree. It's all fair game on the patient's behalf to make those arrangements, even in agreement with close family and friends if the patient is left incapable. That's where the scenario can become a bit tricky depending on given circumstances.

reply