MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > 'Flatliners' getting bad reviews

'Flatliners' getting bad reviews


should have stayed dead

https://www.avclub.com/flatliners-shouldn-t-have-bothered-coming-back-from-the-1818994789

reply

☣️

reply

[deleted]

https://zelda.gamepedia.com/media/zelda.gamepedia.com/thumb/8/8a/LoZ_ST_Link.png/170px-LoZ_ST_Link.png

reply

[deleted]

Not sure which one it's from. The "ST" in the name is probably the game, but I don't know all the titles.

reply

Surely it's the bad movies that need remakes. I don't see the point in remaking good movies. But if you can improve on the bad one, why not?

Or like, have an original idea, but that's just crazy talk.

reply

It's a good point. However the execution fails.
If it's a bad movie then It's bad. Nothing you can do can improve on this.
At least as far as I've seen.
Good movies should never be remade. Yet they are. Over and over and over and over.

Our buddy Christopher Nolan is remaking one of the few good movies he's done. Memento.
This astonishes me. At this point it's all about money like the rest of them.

Originality died in Hollywood many years ago.
But you knew that. :)

reply

There is plenty you can improve on in a bad movie, if it's in the hands of capable people, who are not being limited by a bunch of suits in a conference room. And you already know at least some of what didn't work.

Wait, since when is Nolan (NOLAAAN!!!) remaking Memento? What's to remake in it? Is he going to make it longer and stuff it full of so much exposition it's no longer a movie? I mean, he is aiming for the dummies in the audience as of late, even if he's going for high concept stuff like "black holes make time wonky" and "dreams, eh. weird things happen in them"*, so it makes sense to remake it, just to explain it all in 27 long scenes of people telling you what's happend in the movie so far. That'll surely rake in the cash!

I know, I did a rant.

*I do like those ideas, I just hate how he executes them.

reply

You can always improve but nobody ever does.

I knew this would get you. I wasn't happy about it but you took it to the next level.
Rightfully so. It was a little ranty.

Why isn't he making movies about sleep paralysis ?
Seems like a missed opportunity but that's just me.

Who would play you ?

reply

I hear Nolan (NOLAAAN!) and I am instantly triggered. I'll probably still see Dunkirk when it comes on HBO though.

Most of his movies are like being trapped in sleep paralysis already. You want it to end, but you just can't move from your seat.

Who would play you ?

Tom Hardy.

reply

This is also who I thought of to play you.
It was between Hardy and D.J. Qualls.

reply

Ha! D.J. Qualls. The man is almost 40 years old, and yet I still see him as a teenager. That casting would be perfect actually. But I'd still like Tom Hardy to just be on set. As long as he keeps silent.

Are we still going with Liza Minnelli for you?

reply

Of course Hardy would be seen not heard. Why doesn't this surprise me.

Liza Minnelli has already been established. I don't see the point in
rehashing this again. Unless of course if it was only to make you happy.

reply

Have you heard his silly voices? If he speaks normally that requirement would be dropped.

Just the thought of Minnelli as you makes me happy, so no need to rehash it.

reply

Silly voices ? I guess I haven't paid that much attention to how he speaks.
Except for Taboo of course. "I have a use for you"
Why would you pay attention to how he talks. I mean look at him for crying out loud.
He doesn't need to speak.

There are a few mornings I wake up and feel like Minnelli.
Probably look like her too for that matter.

reply

I am looking at him! That's why I keep watching things he's in, despite the silly voices!

I bet you look fabulous, darling!

reply

"I bet you look fabulous, darling"
Ha!

Now you're going to make me cry or laugh depending on who said this.
Right now I'm hearing Hardy with one of his silly voices saying it.

reply

"Or like, have an original idea, but that's just crazy talk"

LOL, You are insane....

reply

I'll take that as a complement! lol

reply

Yes it was..

reply

I would like a sequel or a reboot / re-intepretation than a flat out remake. I mean Batman can haz re-interpretations as many as they could churn out and I'll leap them all. The Hunger Games movies are basically re-interpretations (or rip-offs) of the Japanese movie Battle Royale. They turned out to be box-office success.

Long overdue sequels are also acceptable to me, like the upcoming Blade Runner 2049 or Terminator: Genisys. Whether the movie turned out good or not is a different matter, original idea movies also can fail too.

But a remake of Flatliners? Who the hell approved this stupid idea? Lol.

reply

A re-intepretation is probably what I mean. Take the source material and make a new, better movie with it.

I'm still not convinced that The Hunger Games are proper rip-offs.

I don't see why Blade Runner needed a sequel. Same goes for Terminator. At this point the time line don't make no sense.

True, original ideas can and do fail, but it is important to still give people a chance at making an original movie. If I want to see a bad Flatliners movie, I'd just watch the first one.

As for the approving, they green light these nonsense projects because people already know the name basically. So they don't have to promote it as much as something people are unfamiliar with. It's all about the bottom line.

reply

Yea... but Flatliners wasn't very popular, was it? And even if it was, it's already forgotten by now. It's not like it's The Magnificent Seven (which also already got a remake), then I can understand because the value of the title alone is worth a few millions. And the original theme song may worth even more. Sadly, the result was (predictably) terrible, but that's beside the point.

Remaking Flatliners is like remaking... I don't know, Crocodile Dundee, or maybe A Walk to Remember, even The Bodyguard. Those were at best mediocre movies that somehow became quite successful at the time of release, but honestly... nobody really wants more of them.

reply

I have no idea how popular Flatliners was. I think all they need is for you to have heard the name. They're targeting all the horror remakes towards teens that are very unlikely to have seen the originals, but would still have heard the names from somewhere.

All the ones you mentioned are movies people know exist. Whether or not people want more of them is another issue all together.

reply

The It remake was (and still is) very successful though. So maybe there is actually people wanting more horror remakes. What do you think will be remade next? Poltegreist? Beetlejuice? I'm betting on Final Destination.

reply

Um, Poltergeist has already been remade... But at the rate they're remaking stuff, I'd go with any of the late 90's/early 00's horror movies. Final Destination fits well. Maybe I Know What You Tweeted Last Summer?

The original IT tv movie is quite popular for some reason I believe. Plus, it has the benefit of being a Stephen King story. That adds so much to name recognition.

Horror, even crappy horror /haven't seen the new IT, so idk how good/bad it is/ will always be popular. Look at all the Paranormal Activity movies. On all accounts terrible movies, still very successful for some reason.


reply

Should have been a cocaine-fueled comedy called Fatliners.

reply

I would watch this.
Hell, I've lived this.

reply

I lived it for about six months, but with methamphetamine.

reply

It boggles my mind that out of all the movies that have ever been made in Hollywood they chose to remake this one.

reply

guess who produced and distributed it







SONY PICTURES

reply

I'm not surprised.

reply

0% on RT so far

reply

Even though it is receiving bad reviews I still don't think it could possibly be any worse than Mother!

reply

My son saw it and people were laughing in places where you shouldn't be laughing. Not good

reply

And it's a sequel, not a remake

reply

[deleted]

The original flatliners was a really good film ! ... Enjoyable and original :)

reply

haha nice

reply