Polyamory
What's your view on it?
shareI'm in love with two womens,so...why not😉
sharewhat about an open relationship?
shareOpen? We keep it a secret😉
sharei'm not someone who has a way with the ladies. They don't go for me.
I admit to liking a variety with regards to hair, eye skin colour I think all are good.
I think the best height for a woman is 5 foot 9 but I have seen women ranging from 5 feet to
5 feet 11 that I consider to be attractive. I prefer long hair and don't like tattoos or piercings.
You can’t be in love, true love, with two women. You may be mistaking love for lust.
Edit: Thanks to Froggy for correcting me. I erred when I transposed two words: It should be “mistakenly *lust* for love”. I should know better to stay away from the keyboard when having a migraine! I’m always open to you guys correcting my errors.😌
Amen, kspkap!
😎
You may be mistaking love for lust.
That's backward, fyi. Should be "mistaking lust for love."
And I point out the slight error because there's an interesting argument that lust is mistaken for love, in general.
For example: We expect and are expected to "fall in love" ONLY with someone of the gender we are sexually attracted to.
That, all by itself, means lust comes first.
If love came first, then a straight person could "fall in love" with someone of the same gender, even with no sexual attraction.
And kspkap: You'd be tempted to say "well that's a close friendship," but that would be completely separate from "true love," which you say can only be shared with ONE person. So, that would not apply to "true love" and is still separate from that concept.
People also generally "fall in love" with someone they find physically attractive. While it does happen, it's excruciatingly rare for someone to fall in love with someone they have no physical attraction to.
"Love" is a magical word that creates a bit of magical thinking. In the end, what we call love is a form of protective pair-bonding that comes from the animal kingdom, and at its base, it's all about reproduction and ensuring the survival of the young. It comes down to caring for the welfare and well-being of those close to us, which is very important for survival, especially for our vulnerable young.
This is why lust comes first, because we are animals first. share
@Froggy
Thanks for correcting my error when I transposed the two words. Bad migraine makes me feel like my eyes are crossed! I also can’t think straight!🤕
Now that I agree with you correcting me re: the error in my transposing the two words, I have to somewhat disagree with your assessment that *lust* prefaces love. Not being male I’m coming from how I believe women react. With the two men who have caused me to *love* them, one from 55 years ago and my current mate of 54 years. In the beginning it was *not* lust. It was attraction, but without lusting. It was dating with liking them as a person. I’m a one guy person. I honestly did not want to date others after dating either one of these two guys. The friendship turned into love with *lust* following. Maybe it was the times and mores are different today. “Back in my day” we didn’t kiss on the first date! We weren’t affectionate with one another...we got to know each other first. Hells bells, nowadays it is *lust* in the beginning...hitting the sack on the first date! But , I do know what *lust* is. As adults in the workforce I’m sure most of us have *lusted* after a co-worker...definitely *not* love. Even good ole Jimmy Carter had “lusted in his heart!” We humans are a complex species.
I have never experienced love.
share