MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Performers' Controversy vs Their Art

Performers' Controversy vs Their Art


Do a performer's scandals, political opinions, or other, possibly shocking, aspects of their lives, affect your appreciation of their work? For example, Woody Allen, Mel Gibson, Roman Polanski, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jane Fonda, etc.

reply


Woody Allen sexually abused children

Mel Gibson physically abused a woman then offered her 15M to stay silent

Roman Polanski sexually abused a child

Arnold Schwarzenegger groped women

Jane Fonda opposed the "war" in vietnam

reply

i wish mel would abuse me...

reply


what Mel gave us in hacksaw ridge was oscar worthy full stop

its the best war film since Lebanon (2010)

there isn't one scene in la la land that deserved best director

only reason they gave chazelle best director was to spite Mel

reply

mel could fuck me up so bad for 15mill and i would thank him afterwords... shit he could break my legs all my fingers..

reply


With Woody Allen there is reasonable doubt, sure him and his movies are definitely creepy but it is not 100% certain if he abused children. Roman Polanski is also a perv and guilty of statutory rape, but in his 1984 memoir, he claimed that he had consensual sex with Samantha Geimer and that he did not drug her.

reply

"reasonable doubt"

the judge said his behavior was grossly inappropriate

measures must be taken to protect dylan

reply


I hate to admit it but I tend to be more forgiving of a performer's dark side if I like their work, not proud of it but I think we've all done it at some point, otherwise there wouldn't be much music, movies or tv shows that we would be able to enjoy.

reply

[deleted]

I was actually more impressed with Swartzanagger's whole double life... thats some real life true lies shit right there...

reply