https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/three-intensive-care-after-deadly-austrian-knife-attack-2025-02-16/
Suspected attacker is 23-year-old Syrian asylum seeker.
One killed, five injured in Saturday's attack.
Suspect had IS flag at home, was radicalised online.
Two things:-
1. Immigration is as certain as salmon jumping up river to return to their birth spot / the sun falling and rising / whatever unstoppable natural phenomemon you want to pick.
2. As long as the colonial / money racketeering activities continue in the middle east, a certain moronic percentage of muslims will look to take vengeance when and where they can.
Put the two together and it doesn't take a genius to understand that "innocent" people will continue to die over and over again in terrorist attacks in the west...
1. He was an illegal alien, not an immigrant. This is the same for 99% of the 3rd world human garbage being dumped in the west.
2. What vengeance? muslims have been conquering, pillaging, raping and enslaving other people and their lands for over a 1000 years. They are not victims, they are a cancer to this world and always will be.
Stop downplaying this savagery. A 14 year child is butchered by this animal just days after a mother and her baby were crushed in a similar attack in Munich, and all you can do is make half assed leftist excuses for it.
You fucking liberal weaklings make me sick. You're all degenerate scumbags to the core. I despise your very existence.
His first statement is fatalistic and says nothing about the ability to deport these so called "inevitables." They can and should be deported, regardless if such a process is not as automatic as water flowing downstream.
The second is essentially true in that the ideology behind those involved in the scenarios like this OP is nearly always linked to the exploitation that he alluded to. Here, what became ISIS was founded, and funded, by US assets attempting to prevent a Marxist revolution in Afghanistan.
Do you know what the ISIS flag says? It's "There is no god but God and Muhammad is the messenger of God." It's the first of the Five Pillars of Islam. Are you similarly familiar with the flag of the Crusader States? It's five crosses representing the spread of Christianity. Or something more modern, the flag used by the IRA was a swords to ploughshares reference:
Isaiah 2:3-4: “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the temple of the God of Jacob. He will teach us his ways, so that we may walk in his paths. The law will go out from Zion, the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. 4 He will judge between the nations and will settle disputes for many peoples. They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore.”
Only it was ironically combined with socialist concepts to where the ploughshare commoners were the swords of the movement, but I digress. The point is that such outcomes are more dependent on the people involved than the religions.
His first statement is fatalistic and says nothing about the ability to deport these so called "inevitables."
Salmon don't survive the journey upstream and dams halt their progress. There could be lessons to be learned from both of precepts.
I don't doubt the lack of a 100% success rate of ending illegal entry, but not doing anything would surely result in zero. The reality will be somewhere in between, but the objective should always be to deport them all.
The reality will be somewhere in between...
I understand the point you're making, but again getting some or most, if not all, is nonetheless worth the endeavor.
shareThe second is essentially true
It's a little unfair of you to not read my post as I'm responding to yours, foremost.
Your Japanese analogy is too dissimilar to be of use. A closer analogy to the situation in Palestine would be to take half of the population from North and South Korea, who hate and are hated by the Japanese generally, give them territory in Japan and all of the political and military power, and then condemn the Japanese for suicide bombing Koreans in Japan and abroad.
There could be something to said about your 3rd worlder argument. Your perspective on that is a bit anachronistic though because, ironically, what you're referring to has more to do with those cultures having developed "proper societies" well before condemning the practices you mentioned became fashionable. What they actually lack is an Enlightenment followed by a Postmodern revaluation of thought, or that's what distinguishes them rather.
1. He was an illegal alien, not an immigrant. This is the same for 99% of the 3rd world human garbage being dumped in the west.
2. What vengeance? muslims have been conquering, pillaging, raping and enslaving other people and their lands for over a 1000 years. They are not victims, they are a cancer to this world and always will be.
1) Fish return to their original place of birth to spawn. They don't invade other fishes rivers, not at the very least strap bombs to themselves to kill other fish they disagree with.
2) As long as there are left wing morons in power letting in muslims, muslims will come in and take over.
Put the 2 and 2 together and it doesn't take a genius to understand that if you don't want innocent people to be killed by muslims, don't let muslims get near them.
Like the reply above yours 1) is just a political response pulled out of your ass.
The point is that makes no odds what you think, e.g. "at the very least strap bombs to themselves to kill other fish they disagree with", they're going to do it anyway. Same thing as going "boo boo but the muslims are really bad people!". A percentage are going to be radicalised enough that they don't give a shit about dying as long as they take some infidels out with them...
And as to 2) It makes fuck all difference who's in power. Like I said, it's like osmosis. You can't contain the natural flow of people within the system. Plugging the dike with their fingers doesn't make one side of the political allusion some sort of 1950s saving heroes.