MovieChat Forums > Politics > Do right wingers do anything that doesen...

Do right wingers do anything that doesent directly benefit them?

posted 11 days ago by moviechatterer (16313)
52 replies | jump to latest

Some of the discussions in the other posts have got me thinking.

Right wingers are constantly dismissing the concerns of lefties as "commie bullshit"
and the theme thats emerging seems to me to be " If we addressed that it would inconvenience me OR cost taxpayers money and i wouldn't be the beneficiary"

Theres two categories as far as I can see
1) government handouts to poor people

2) General conservation issues , like recycling , climate change , renewable power , and most recently in anther thread - single use plastic .

Its the second one I'm interested in
So my question is :
Are there *any* issues of pollution , conservation or sustainability that right wingers think need addressing ?

or is the present system of unstainable growth and consumption and landfill working just fine and nothing to worry about?

[–] KingBob (3265) 9 days ago

Yes, “right wingers” believe in protecting children from gender ideology, child trafficking, child groomer teachers, etc. The left is for those things. “Right wingers” believe in lower taxes for everyone. The left believes in higher taxes for everyone. “Right wingers” are against overseas human rights abusers (Palestine, South Africa, etc.)and want to stop sending them tax money. The left wants to continue human rights abuse across the globe.

The Democrat Party is literally the modern day Nazis. “Right wingers” want to rid the world of evil and radicalism.

[–] tvfan (14545) 9 days ago

Do you personally know any actual "right wingers" IRL? ... No, of course not.

You're too brainwashed to know what a "right winger" is.

If you personally knew a right winger, you wouldn't be asking such nonsense questions about them.

[–] Patman111196 (1893) 7 days ago

I clearly remember the left doing something like that as well. Remember that "border" bill they put in a bunch of other crap that completely overshadowed their recommendation of how to handle the border? Is it not possible for both sides to do that kind of thing?