MovieChat Forums > Politics > Democrats not respecting democracy

Democrats not respecting democracy


https://www.newsweek.com/list-democrats-skipping-donald-trumps-inauguration-2001234

What is wrong with them? Why can’t they just admit that Trump won fair and square and that it’s time to unite and rally behind their president? I thought they were the ones who thought you should respect democracy or does that door only swing one way? This also sounds dangerously close to insurrectionist behavior.

reply

They did this in 2016 too.

Democrats are the party of hate America first. Have been since they killed JFK.

reply

I agree, Democrats already tried to have Trump assassinated twice, the least they could do is support him at his own inauguration. They are a bunch of deplorable bigots and Trumps first action needs to be investigating Brandon and Kamala for their treasonous actions and then bringing federal charges against them. No one is above the law.

reply

You mean like claiming the election was a 'steal' and then storming the government? Oh, er ....

Also I don't think attending an inauguration is compulsory. It is is not as if Trump did not attend the last one. Oh er....

reply

Democrats already moaned and complained about 4 years about Republicans not respecting Democracy. Given all that you’d think they’d at least have the common human decency to show up and support Trump at his own inauguration. You’re nothing more than a bunch of pathetic losers.

Also no one “stormed the government”. The Democrats perpetuated a series of lies and disinformation about J6 for 3.5 years and in reality it was nothing more than a couple of broken windows. I mean it’s not like they tried twice to murder a US Presidential Candidate and former US President, oh wait that was all the Democrats.

Or are you trying to say that the Democrats are not the champions of Democracy and are in reality just as bad as they claim Trump is? Which is it?

reply

Who cares who comes to Trumps party?

Not attending DT's inauguration is not "disrespecting democracy" on the same scale as Trump taking a big steaming shit on the constitution by refusing to acknowledge the result of a democratic vote and gtfo of the Whitehouse, and then try to take it by force.

One is an inconsequential nothing,
The other is a traitorous crime that he should be strung up for.


talk about pot and kettle!


reply

It very much is. It shows they don’t accept the election results and it shows complete disrespect for our democracy. Democrats only care about democracy when they win. If they cared about democracy they wouldn’t have forced Brandon out, they wouldn’t have had tried to have Trump assassinated and they would put on their big boy and big girl pants and celebrate his crushing victory at the inauguration.

reply

at least have the common human decency to show up and support Trump at his own inauguration.


As already mentioned that was not the common decency Trump showed last time around. I hope for his sake that more turn up for his event, his last one was thinly attended.

Also no one “stormed the government”. The Democrats perpetuated a series of lies and disinformation about J6 for 3.5 years and in reality it was nothing more than a couple of broken windows...


A convenient view, but I watched the violence myself on TV, and it can found easily on line so sorry about that.

Or are you trying to say that the Democrats are not the champions of Democracy and are in reality just as bad as they claim Trump is? Which is it?


I am not trying to say either of these things, just that people in glass houses should not throw stones,

Democrats already tried to have Trump assassinated twice,


Conspiracy theories can be wonderful things.

reply

That’s the point nimrod, Donald Trump was smeared nonstop in the media, had to go through 2 fake impeachments, multiple fake indictments and had his house raided. Nothing even close to that level has happened to any Democrat and they are guilty of far more than Donald Trump is.

You saw the selectively edited footage that Pelosi allowed you to see. Most of the crowd was peaceful and was let in by Capitol Police. You people politicized this and lied about it to get back at Donald Trump. It was treason and right now it looks like Liz Cheney is going to have quite a lot of legal problems coming up for her role in the 1/6 conspiracy.

So then Democrats don’t deserve the moral high ground when it comes to democracy?

No conspiracy theory at all. 7-13 and 9-15 are both actual events and they are the worst thing to happen to our country since 9/11. Far left terror is a clear threat to our democracy.

reply

Donald Trump ... had his house raided


Yes, and what did they find?

You saw the selectively edited footage that Pelosi allowed you to see.


No, I saw the unedited live stream, and then more footage released more recently.


[blah] selectively edited footage that Pelosi allowed you to see. .. You people politicized this and lied about it ...

... No conspiracy theory at all


No, of course not lol. One is not forgetting your other striking claims of this ilk, just recently e.g. "it wasn’t the right who tried to have a Presidential Candidate murdered twice " Do you get out much?

reply

Nothing incriminating, and nothing that wasn’t also in Brandon’s garage.

You only saw the selectively edited, Pelosi approved footage. Most of the footage showed a mostly peaceful crowd, there were a couple of broken windows and if you seriously cared about rioting you’d have something to say about the over 500 BLM riots that resulted in torched courthouses, police stations, thousands of cops in the hospital, dozens dead, entire city blocks taken over.

The right didn’t incite assassination attempts on Kamala, Kamala and Brandon tried to have Trump murdered all throughout the campaign. They both need to be held accountable for 7-13 and 9-15.

reply

Nothing incriminating,


No just piles of top secret files, retained illegally and even stored insecurely. Or was the footage of that manipulated by Pelosi too? Let me guess...

You only saw the selectively edited, Pelosi approved footage.

,
I told you exactly what I saw, and what I know I saw; please check back. And even if it was selectively edited while, er, live streamed, then the violence still happened.

if you seriously cared about rioting you’d have something to say about BLM riots


Being even-handed I condemn all rioting and violence. Unlike yourself, who now it appears does not condemn all terror.

The right didn’t incite assassination attempts on Kamala, Kamala and Brandon tried to have Trump murdered all throughout the campaign.


Oh dear.

reply

He was a former President, he had every right to have those files. Brandon however did not. Brandon committed treason yet of course the highly politicized Brandon justice department only went after Trump. That’s liberal privilege for you.

Violence still happened in Summer 2020 when BLM was torching the country to the ground, yet we were just supposed to accept those riots as mostly peaceful. 1/6 was mostly peaceful, yes a few windows were broken but it was mostly harmless.

I asked you about far left terror, you are too much of a coward to make a stand against it. That’s really telling about your lack of morality and character. That’s like a police officer telling a parent whose kid just robbed a convenience story, do you understand why what your kid did was wrong? And the parent responds with “I understand that all kids who rob convenience stores did something wrong”. You’re deflecting and you’re creating excuses to not have to take a stand against the evil within your cult.

??????

reply

He was a former President, he had every right to have those files.


Kept unsecured at home?

The difference between Biden and Trump, both equally guilty of this was in aggravation and extent. It had nothing to do with 'liberal privilege'. Biden had fewer files, and admitted his mistake immediately. Trump, characteristically, did not.

Violence still happened in Summer 2020 when BLM was torching the country to the ground, yet we were just supposed to accept those riots as mostly peaceful. 1/6 was mostly peaceful, yes a few windows were broken but it was mostly harmless.


Thank you for repeating your opinions.

I asked you about far left terror, you are too much of a coward to make a stand against it. you are too much of a coward to make a stand against it. That’s really telling about your lack of morality and character.


"I never insulted anyone" LOL

That’s like a police officer telling a parent whose kid just robbed a convenience story, do you understand why what your kid did was wrong? And the parent responds with “I understand that all kids who rob convenience stores did something wrong”. You’re deflecting


A false and convenient comparison, since you are conflating the specific with the general here. It is quite possible to condemn specifically the murdering former police office Chauvin who knelt on George Floyd's neck, and also condemn more widely the violence of 'BLM riots'. But, good try.

reply

Brandon had no right to have the documents, he was the VP, not the President. How well he secured the documents is irrelevant. Brandon should have gone to prison for stealing secured documents. Trump was well within his authority.

Not my opinion, these were objective facts.

I didn’t insult you, I faced you with the facts and told you how it was, sorry you don’t like the answers.

Not a false comparison at all, a very convenient comparison. George Floyd died of an overdose and the far left including Brandon and Kamala used the incident to perpetuate their lies about “systemic racism” which resulted in over 500 violent BLM riots. I have yet to hear anyone on the left say anything about those riots, they spent all of their time obsessing over the broken windows.

reply

Brandon had no right to have the documents, he was the VP, not the President.


What (or who) are you talking about? I thought we were discussing the respective cases of Biden and Trump - the prominent cases which matter and which are often debated over - and Brandon was just your mock name for the former.

Trump was well within his authority.


Trump was out of office and still refused to hand top secret documents back, which made it worse. I do accept though that, since the recent SCOTUS decison a president can get away with anything done when arguably part of his 'official duties'.

I didn’t insult you

"you are... a coward ... your lack of morality and character... You people ... lied" QED

I faced you with the facts and told you how it was, sorry you don’t like the answers.

If you have actually done that it would be addressing my arguments, which is what I expect .. not offering ad hominems, attacking the person and not what they say. Please move and just don't do it again.

George Floyd died of an overdose

The second page of the autopsy report released three years ago by Hennepin County concludes that it was a homicide due to “cardiopulmonary arrest” from “law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.” And if was not murdered then why was Chauvin sent to FCI Tucson from a maximum-security Minnesota state prison in August 2022 to serve a 22-year sentence for the second-degree murder of Mr Floyd?

“systemic racism”

https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/examples-of-systemic-racism/
https://robertsmith.com/blog/examples-of-systemic-racism/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593028/

Oh that is right, all just fake news.

reply

That was no homicide, the AR actually concluded that Floyd overdosed and died in the ambulance or at the hospital. Chauvin was a political sacrifice.

https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/examples-of-systemic-racism/
https://robertsmith.com/blog/examples-of-systemic-racism/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593028/

More propaganda ... Shocker.

reply

That was no homicide .. the AR actually concluded that Floyd overdosed


The second page of the autopsy report released three years ago by Hennepin County actually concludes that it was a homicide due to “cardiopulmonary arrest” from “law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.” And if it really wasn't the homicide he was convicted of, then why has Chauvin not had a successful appeal against his sentence for second-degree murder?

More propaganda ... Shocker


A right wing trope when confronted with things that they don't want to hear. No shock. I shan't have to worry about you offering any rebutting links or sources though, ever, will I? LOL

reply

You obviously read the wrong autopsy.

Your scriptures are old and the new findings already confirmed that Floyd died of an overdose (something that many of us new from the beginning).

All this has been revealed and discussed a while back on this board, the Chauvin board and the Floyd board.

Keep up. Your propaganda and fake news is outdated.

I shan't have to worry about you offering any rebutting links or sources though, ever, will I?

Links and sources for gaslighting liars is futile.

reply

You obviously read the wrong autopsy.


Here is some more internet scripture for you to dismiss out of hand:

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/04/20/fact-check-george-floyd-video-autopsy-contradict-staged-death-claim/7300583002/

All this has been revealed and discussed a while back on this board, the Chauvin board and the Floyd board.


Given the alt-right echo chamber that much of this board represents, I am sure the consensus was entirely satisfactory to you all.

And you still haven't told me if that, it really wasn't homicide he was guilty of, then why has Chauvin not successfully appealed against his sentence for, er, second-degree murder? Is this another conspiracy I see before me?

Links and sources for gaslighting liars is futile.

lol whatever

reply

But Muh fact checker says; lmao.

Fact Checkers = Misinformation and Disinformation

Oh and your FC is still outdated.

reply

Oh dear. Nothing more from you then of any substance; just the usual. Deny things that don't suit your world view but offer nothing of your own.

You still haven't told me if it really wasn't homicide he was guilty of, then why Chauvin has not had a successful appeal against his sentence for second-degree murder. Or indeed how the justice system could have made a silly mistake. Evasion noted.

reply

then why Chauvin has not had a successful appeal against his sentence for second-degree murder.

They're working on it ... Keep up.

This past week the court (federal judge) just granted Chauvin’s legal team permission to test George Floyd’s heart tissue for appeal.

reply

They're working on it ...


Fair enough. And I will accept that originally Chauvin agreed that the sentencing for this crime should be based only on the sentence for second-degree murder because he acted willfully and in callous and wanton disregard of the consequences to Mr. Floyd’s life . But still, Chauvin actually admitted that his willful use of unreasonable force resulted in Mr. Floyd’s bodily injury and death because his actions impaired Mr. Floyd’s ability to obtain and maintain sufficient oxygen to sustain Mr. Floyd’s life.

But the legal barriers to succeeding on a claim of ineffective counsel are very high. It would of course also have to be the case that Chauvin's actions did not still aggravate a pre-existing condition, bringing on his death.

reply

WTF are you talking about? Brandon was caught red handed with classified documents in his garage that he never should have had, but he got off Scott free because we live in a society systematically set up to favor liberals. It’s called “liberal privilege”

Trump had every right to have every document he had. You’re arguing nonsense.

That’s not an insult, that’s just an accurate observation I made. You’re just pissy because you don’t like the facts.

The jury didn’t even convict Chauvin of murder, even the far left jury agreed that Chauvin didn’t murder George Floyd. He was convicted for not providing adequate care when Floyd started ODing which is bullshit. Floyd died of an overdose. The initial autopsy showed that he did not die of strangulation he died of the excessive fentanyl in his system. It was after the pathologist was threatened by the mob and pressured by Democrats that he changed his assessment. Also you’re asking me questions that you yourself are responsible for answering considering they are part of your own assertions, I’m not doing your job for you.

Systemic racism is a made up catch phrase the left invented. There is no such thing as systemic racism. That’s just something the left cries whenever they think they’ve found an incident that they can use to manipulate and fool people into believing it so they can get votes. People who claim it exists are liars. Also your evidence is people saying it exists? That’s not evidence you nimrod.

reply

WTF are you talking about?


I am talking about a direct comparison between Trump and Biden and the misuse of top secret documents. For the reasons already given, Trump was more egregious. I have no idea who 'Brandon' is nor do I care, as it is irrelevant to that comparison. Diversion noted.

"you are... a coward ... chickenshit ...your lack of morality and character... You people ... lied ...you nimrod."
That’s not an insult,

So if I called you these things you would not feel at all insulted? I will remember that, thanks.
Trump had every right to have every document he had.

Stored insecurely, after he left office, at home? Yeah right. A shame that it looks like he will escape justice through being re elected.
The jury didn’t even convict Chauvin of murder,

Fair enough, technically speaking; but Chauvin agreed that the sentencing for this crime should be based on the sentence for second-degree murder because he acted willfully and in callous and wanton disregard of the consequences to Mr. Floyd’s life. Chauvin also actually admitted at his trial that his willful use of unreasonable force resulted in Mr. Floyd’s bodily injury and death because his actions impaired Mr. Floyd’s ability to obtain and maintain sufficient oxygen to sustain Mr. Floyd’s life.

It was after the pathologist was threatened by the mob and pressured by Democrats that he changed his assessment [blah]

You certainly go large on conspiracies don't you, lol?

"Carolyn Marinan, a spokesperson for Hennepin County, confirmed that the [autopsy] report “has not been amended or changed since it was finalized on June 1, 2020.”
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-george-floyd-autopsy-new-892530421961
Systemic racism is a made up catch phrase the left invented.
I gave you the links. It has been extensively researched and identified. Get over it. With this lying, your lack of morality and character is showing, you chickenshit cowardly nimrod. I trust you didn't find that insulting?

reply

The comparison is that Trump actually had a right to the documents he had, Brandon didn’t yet the biased, left wing, weaponized justice system only cared about Trump. Why? Because they wanted to keep him from running.

Quite honestly your opinion of me is pretty low on my priority list. I think you need to toughen up and get over it.

Chauvin did not kill Floyd, Floyd was even alive when they took him to the hospital, Chauvin is in prison because the jury was afraid the BLM mob would kill them if they acquitted Chauvin.

No conspiracy theory at all, the pathologist changed his opinion because he was afraid of the BLM terrorists.

You gave me links of people saying it exists, that isn’t proof. Tell me what “systemic racism” would I be subjected to in my everyday life if I were black and everything else was the same? Balls in your court and you should be able to answer this question if your premise were true.

reply

The comparison is that Trump actually had a right to the documents he had,


An ex president is not allowed to keep state secrets at home after leaving office (if at all) let alone in a totally unsecured fashion.

the biased, left wing, weaponized justice system only cared about Trump. Why? Because they wanted to keep him from running.


Thank your opinion. Or is another conspiracy theory I see before me?

Quite honestly your opinion of me is pretty low on my priority list. I think you need to toughen up and get over it. Chauvin did not kill Floyd,

He admitted to it in court. Or was he just saying that as the victim of yet another conspiracy?

No conspiracy theory at all, the pathologist changed his opinion because he was afraid of the BLM terrorists.

Sounds like one to me. And, as stressed by local officials, the autopsy report was not even changed. But I forget: they would say that, wouldn't they?

Tell me what “systemic racism” would I be subjected to in my everyday life if I were black and everything else was the same?

Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice. ...
Education Inequities. ...
Housing Discrimination. ...
Employment Discrimination. ...
Healthcare Disparities. ...
Environmental Racism. ...
Racial Profiling and Policing. ...
Voter Suppression.

https://robertsmith.com/blog/examples-of-systemic-racism/

Glad to help. Are you really saying that there is no racism in the US? Or perhaps there never has been? That the Civil Rights Movement was all... a dream?

reply

He very much did but a vice president very much does not. Again selective moral outrage. Brandon is clearly guilty of what you falsely accused Trump of yet you only focus on Trump. Trump needs to lock Merrick Garland and all of the members of the Brandon justice department up for their treasonous activities. The Justice system should never be weaponized against political opponents, it was one of the most shameful moments in US History.

Chauvin did not kill the drug addict. George Floyd died of an overdose and the jury convicted him because they were afraid of Brandon’s race baiting mob. He has grounds for a retrial and hopefully he gets a fair one this time.
No conspiracy theory at all, the autopsy report was changed, the evidence against Chauvin was 100 percent fabricated. The conspiracy theories come from the left wing such as the cops having a secret agenda to harass and murder innocent black people, you people are crazy.

You didn’t provide evidence again you are providing assertions that it exists, that’s not evidence you idiot. There is no voter suppression in the United States, there is no systemic racism, just lies by the far left that you are latching on to so you can virtue signal. Fortunately all this race and gender shit was overwhelmingly rejected by the American people last month and it’s now over. I also seem to remember asking you what racism would I be subjected to if everything about me was the same except my skin color. You never answered and you should be able to if your premise had any weight to it.

Also I never said racism doesn’t exist, BLM was caught shouting “shoot the white folk” during their insurrections, sounds pretty racist to me. I said that by being black you aren’t by default a victim of racism. That’s quite different than saying racism doesn’t exist you dishonest race baiter.

reply

Biden is clearly guilty of what you falsely accused Trump of yet you only focus on Trump.


For the reasons already given, Trump's offence was more egregious. That would be the point. And you only focus on Defendant Donald's innocence.

Trump needs to lock Merrick Garland and all of the members of the Brandon justice department up for their treasonous activities. The Justice system should never be weaponized against political opponents, it was one of the most shameful moments in US History.


Thank you for your partisan opinion and you are welcome to it.

Chauvin did not kill the drug addict. George Floyd died of an overdose

Your memory is giving you problems again. As reported earlier, Chauvin actually admitted that his willful use of unreasonable force resulted in Mr. Floyd’s bodily injury and death because his actions impaired Mr. Floyd’s ability to obtain and maintain sufficient oxygen to sustain Mr. Floyd’s life.

Also, please take the time to reacquaint yourself with the official cause of death on the last page of the autopsy report. I shan't remind you of these useful pointers to truth and away from conspiracy theories again.

He has grounds for a retrial and hopefully he gets a fair one this time.

I wish every one a fair trial, but to lodge a successful appeal, Chauvin would have to show that his original counsel Cahill engaged in an "abuse of discretion," or made a mistake that was clearly unreasonable or against the evidence. That standard is "almost always insurmountable," said Paul Applebaum, a Minnesota criminal defense lawyer.

the autopsy report was changed,

Not according to local officials, (also quoted before by me) but if such a conspiracy theory entertains, keep with it lol
The conspiracy theories come from the left wing such as the cops having a secret agenda to harass and murder innocent black people, you people are crazy.

Project much?

You didn’t provide evidence again you are providing assertions

Actually I have provided links for things and a healthy injection of common sense. All you provide are conspiracies out of the right wing playbook.

There is no voter suppression in the United States


https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/ensure-every-american-can-vote/voter-suppression

there is no systemic racism,


Didn't read all the links I have provided then, after you asked for specific examples, then?

Fortunately all this race and gender shit [blah]


You seem incredibly triggered.

I also seem to remember asking you what racism would I be subjected to if everything about me was the same except my skin color. You never answered and you should be able to if your premise had any weight to it.


Belief in reverse racism, if that is what you have in mind, is widespread in the United States; however, there is little to no empirical evidence that white Americans as a group are disadvantaged. Such suggestions are just right wing tropes. However reason ought to tell you that people of all colour can quite obviously be discriminated for a number of reasons not pertaining to skin colour. Glad to help.

Also I never said racism doesn’t exist


Pleased to hear it, as it would be a nonsense statement to make.

BLM was caught shouting “shoot the white folk” during their insurrections, sounds pretty racist to me.


Which would be, as you ought to know by now, something I would necessarily condemn. You don't need to persuade me that there are bad people in any group but as your Lord God Trump infamously said, there are also some 'fine people', right?

I said that by being black you aren’t by default a victim of racism. That’s quite different than saying racism doesn’t exist


If you said that then I must have missed it, and I would agree with you. But, according to the respected Pew Research Center data, approximately 8 out of 10 African-Americans say they have experienced personal discrimination because of their race or ethnicity, citing an increase in white supremacist hate groups.

you dishonest race baiter.


You really work hard at your ad hominems at this don't you? Is race baiter better or worse than a chickenshit cowardly nimrod?

reply

No he wasn’t, you’re only believing the far left lies perpetuated by the fake news. President Trump had an honorable administration that was targeted by the corrupt, far left from day 1. LOL you are doing some serious copying “Defendant Donald”, I think you mean President Trump. He’s not going to jail, he will be your president whether you like it or not, there’s nothing you can do about it expect mope like a little 2 year old.

Nothing you said about Chauvin matters, the jury that was being threatened by radical BLM terrorists didn’t even convict him of murder, if the evidence was so clear that Chauvin murdered him they would have convicted him of murder. Floyd didn’t even die until he got to the hospital. Chauvin didn’t murder him, Floyd OD’ed because of his own bad choices and you people tried to burn the country down over some lowlife drug dealing loser.

Chauvin has a very good chance of being acquitted, but we will have to wait and see. I wish him the best, no one should have to go to jail over a lowlife like George Floyd.

LOL, so your proof that the autopsy wasn’t change is based on the word of the local official who changed the autopsy report. Biased much?

I did read your articles, your articles contain assertions, not proof. Assertions are not proof. I can do the same thing: Systemic racism is a lie, see how easy that was.

Not triggered at all, in fact I’m very joyous right now that evil was defeated last November and I am enjoying watching your cult melt down, divorce their spouses, shave their heads and refuse to have sex with people who would never have sex with them anyways.

reply

you’re only believing the far left lies perpetuated by the fake news.

This is just the usual right wing trope of not accepting anything which contradicts a preferred narrative, something unfortunately only too common to this board,

President Trump had an honorable administration that was targeted by the corrupt, far left from day 1.

Again, thank you for your partisan opinions.

there’s nothing you can do about it

But I don't want to 'do anything about it'. Luckily I don't live with your lot, and so am sitting back enjoying the schadenfreude and entertainment value the new admin offers. Especially as it seems there will be two presidents, Musk and Trump inevitably doomed to fall out.

the jury that was being threatened by radical BLM terrorists didn’t even convict him of murder, if the evidence was so clear that Chauvin murdered him they would have convicted him of murder.

Have you got a fresh conspiracy you can offer? This one is getting tired and moreover still offered without evidence. And as already pointed out, Chauvin admitted to killing in court.

so your proof that the autopsy wasn’t change is based on the word of the local official who changed the autopsy report.

And your proof is.... a right wing echo chamber.
Assertions are not proof. I can do the same thing

As you have, all through this exchange ...
I’m very joyous right now that evil was defeated last November... I am enjoying watching your cult melt down,

I worry about you when you get all religious on me....
divorce their spouses, shave their heads and refuse to have sex with people who would never have sex with them anyways.

I have no idea where you are going but have a nice time when you get there. For me, this is the last reply, unless you really offer something new, as you are now just repeating assertions, echoing conspiracies, and ultimately offering more and more elaborate insults in lieu of argument. But thank you for playing.

reply

There’s no proof that blacks are disadvantaged either and I don’t think you care about the African American community, just like how you don’t care about the Jewish community. I think you pretend to care about African Americans because they are a huge Democrat voting demographic but if they shifted the other way you would be calling them “Uncle Toms” just like you do to black conservatives.

Of course, I never said racism doesn’t exist. When BLM was calling for the murder of white people that was a textbook definition of racism. Does that prove that all of BLM is racist? No it doesn’t, but the fact that BLM wouldn’t condemn it speaks volumes.

So then you condemn BLM for calling for the murder of white people? I didn’t ask if you condemn all racism, I asked you about BLM, don’t deflect you little chickenshit.

How do we know these 8 out of 10 African Americans are telling the truth? What constitutes “personal discrimination”? I’ve been told that all of the accomplishments I’ve achieved in my life are because I’m white, that sounds racist so it seems I’ve experienced “personal discrimination” as well. And those people saying they’ve experienced racism probably came from the far left as the Democrats are the party of racism and hate.

Nope, calling you a race baiter is just me trying to be as accurate as possible.

reply

agreed, dems said the election was hijacked then investigated for 2 years and then tried to impeach Trump twice. then the dems tried to kill Trump 3 times. no big deal.

reply

then the dems tried to kill Trump 3 times. no big deal.


The last conspiracist (just above) only went for 2 attempts I seem to remember... do I hear any advance on three?

reply

dems have been trying to kill Trump since 2016, so the actual number is prob in the high 50's.

reply

Any advance on this, ladies and gentlemen? Going once...

reply

I have some advice. We have a national conversation about the threats that far left terror poses to our democracy and we have the high level democrats who incited both assassination attempts prosecuted, the move down to their co-conspirators in the media.

reply

I have some advice ... that far left terror poses to our democracy


I have some better advice: a national conversation which is even-handed and recognises the threats which come from extremists on both sides of the political divide.

the high level democrats who incited both assassination attempts prosecuted.. their co-conspirators in the media.


That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed on the same basis.

reply

That is such a cop out, it wasn’t the right who tried to have a Presidential Candidate murdered twice. It wasn’t the right who burned cities to the ground over 500 times over some drug dealer who died from an overdose, it wasn’t the right who sent death threats to electors to try to overturn an election.

I am asking you, filmflaneur, once and for all, will you stand with me and denounce far left terror?

reply

it wasn’t the right who tried to have a Presidential Candidate murdered twice.


Only twice? It was up to 'over fifty' alleged by someone here lately lol

Also, there has been no right wing conspiracy discovered to kill Defendant Donald, if that is what you imply. In fact

Assassin 1: Evidence on his political views remains inconclusive. In January 2021, he donated $15 to a voter turnout group with a Democratic platform. When he reached the voting age of 18 in September 2021, he registered to vote in Pennsylvania as a member of the Republican Party and remained registered as a Republican until his death.

Assassin 2: Routh’s social posts and news accounts found that although Routh described himself as a Trump supporter-turned-Trump critic, his voter registration history showed no clear sign of consistent support of either party.


I am asking you, filmflaneur, once and for all, will you stand with me and denounce far left terror?


I denounce terror from which ever side of the political spectrum it comes, that is to be even-handed as I mentioned, just above. As anyone with sense and balance ought to be. Will you stand with me on that basis?

reply

I never said it was up to 50, but President Trump is the first US President to be shot since Ronald Reagan, that should frighten you. The left is unhinged, violent, evil and dangerous and there need to be serious investigations into the far left cult.

That is such a cop out, and you are a complete coward. I didn’t ask you to denounce “all terror” I asked if you would denounce far left terror and you gave such a chickenshit “I denounce all terror” response. I denounced the broken windows on Jan 7th, 2021, you people still will not denounce Kamala and Brandon inciting 2 assassination attempts on President Trump. You people own both 7-13 and 9-15.

reply

I never said it was up to 50,


I didn't say you did. But someone just today on this board assured me of that. I guess some conspiracists can be wrong, then huh?

The left is unhinged, violent, evil and dangerous


Some on the right are just as reprehensible, while you have yet to prove a conspiracy with this speculation - or is it wishful thinking? I have also shown that the two Trump would-be assassins were not clearly leftist. Sorry about that.

and you are a complete coward.


Why is it Rightists always start insulting when opposing views are put persistently and politely? Is it a psychological thing with you people, to shout down opponents that way?

I didn’t ask you to denounce “all terror” I asked if you would denounce far left terror and you gave such a chickenshit “I denounce all terror” response.


'All terror' necessarily includes that from the far left. But does this mean that you think some terror is acceptable, then?

you people still will not denounce Kamala and Brandon inciting 2 assassination attempts on President Trump


Because this claim is nonsense.

reply

Then I don’t know why you’re throwing the number 50 at me. Idiot

The right is not unhinged, the right did not actively try to have Kamala murdered the way the left tried to have Trump murdered. Both of the would be assassins were leftists, the first one donated heavily to Democrats and the second one even had a freaking Harris - Walz sticker on his truck. They were both one of your own.

I never insulted anyone, just gave you a much needed dose of reality.

So then you denounce far left terror, correct? That is not an essay question, nimrod.

It’s not nonsense, both Brandon and Kamala tried to have Trump killed because they were afraid he was going to win. They are both traitors.

reply

I don’t know why you’re throwing the number 50 at me.


To show the range of absurdity this particular conspiracy theory covers.

The right is not unhinged, the right did not actively try to have Kamala murdered the way the left tried to have Trump murdered. Both of the would be assassins were leftists


Please see the research on the two would-be assassins I gave, just above. One was even a registered Republican voter. There has not been any evidence uncovered of them being part of a wider conspiracy.

I never insulted anyone... Idiot.. you complete coward


Oh dear.

So then you denounce far left terror, correct?


Since I denounce all terror, from whatever side, that ought to be obvious.

So you don't denounce right wing terrorists, right?

It’s not nonsense, both Brandon and Kamala tried to have Trump killed because they were afraid he was going to win. They are both traitors.


Something asserted without evidence can be dismissed in the same fashion. Aren't conspiracy theories wonderful things though?

reply

First of all I had nothing to do with this “50” conspiracy theory, secondly 7-13 and 9-15 are not conspiracy theories, they were attempts by the far left, incited by Brandon and Kamala to assassinate their political opponent. It was a clear threat to our democracy and was the worst thing to happen to our country since 9/11. The fact that you won’t take a stand against it is baffling. This is literally the easiest stance to take.

I have done research, far more than you, they were both dedicated liberals who were ordered by their leaders Brandon and Kamala to take out Trump. It’s not fully their faults, they were just manipulated by the lies of Brandon and Kamala.

You are a coward.

I’ll give you one more chance: Will you stand with me against Far Left Terror. That is a “yes” or “no” question (or “I’m too much of a chickenshit to answer”, I’ll accept that also)

I already denounced the broken windows, I did that years ago, move on to something else. Trump has turned the page on the broken windows, I don’t know why you haven’t.

Again not conspiracy theories. Kamala and Brandon raised the temperature by lying about Trump being Hitler. If you seriously believe that a Presidential Candidate is literally the next Hitler you have no choice but to be violent.

reply

First of all I had nothing to do with this “50” conspiracy theory,

I never said you did, as I already said, it was introduced to show the range of absurdity this particular conspiracy theory can entail. Please pay attention.

secondly 7-13 and 9-15 are not conspiracy theories, they were attempts by the far left, incited by Brandon and Kamala to assassinate their political opponent.

Other opinions are available, and I have already expressed them - and what I think of conspiracy theories.

The fact that you won’t take a stand against it is

If you mean I don't take a stand against alleged left-wing terror when I condemn all terror even-handedly, that is logical nonsense. It is more concerning that you do not condemn right wing terror, but only that which serves you too, as already mentioned.

I have done research, far more than you, they were both dedicated liberals who were ordered by their leaders Brandon and Kamala to take out Trump

Thank you for reiterating your pet conspiracy theory yet again. Feel free to come back when you have any reaL proof and not just echo-chamber rumours.

You are a coward.

The coward is more the one who does not condemn his friends, just his foes for the same crime. QED

Will you stand with me against Far Left Terror. That is a “yes” or “no” question

Yes, obviously - for if I stand against all terror inevitably I must do some of it, duh. Why is such even-handedness so hard for you to understand (or exercise)?

I already denounced the broken windows, I did that years ago, move on to something else. Trump has turned the page on the broken windows, I don’t know why you haven’t.

No idea what you are on about sorry, and broken windows are not 'terror'.

Kamala and Brandon raised the temperature by lying about Trump being Hitler. If you seriously believe that a Presidential Candidate is literally the next Hitler you have no choice but to be violent.

Following on from that exact same comment from JD Vance back in the day? lol

Now; do you have anything else other than conspiracies, logical incoherence, and name calling?

reply

Then it was stupid to bring up. You’re arguing against things I never said.

No “conspiracy theory” at all, Donald Trump did survive two assassination attempts and Kamala and Brandon have their fingerprints all over both of them.

Yet I’m asking you to condemn left wing terror and you’re tap dancing around like a coward. Will you stand with me and condemn left wing terror: A) Yes, B) No, C) I’m too much of a chickenshit to answer. Which is it?

Brandon and Kamala both compared Trump to Hitler and said he was a threat to democracy. That’s all the proof I need. If you seriously think that democracy is about to end it becomes your moral and patriotic duty to do something about it. Both shooters were fooled and manipulated by Brandon and Kamala’s lies and conspiracy theories.

For crying out loud, I already condemned the window breaking, i did it over 3 years ago. The difference is you won’t condemn your friends for attempting to assassinate a US President.

What JD Vance may or may not have said is irrelevant. Brandon and Kamala both incited two attempted assassinations. You’re deflecting again like a coward, you can’t defend your gods so you’re trying to deflect. You are such a coward.

reply

No “conspiracy theory” at all, Donald Trump did survive two assassination attempts and Kamala and Brandon have their fingerprints all over both of them.


... An idea concocted without evidence, certainly without any conclusive evidence.

Yet I’m asking you to condemn left wing terror


To help you, here it is as a simple syllogism:

1. I condemn all terror.
2. Left wing terror is part of all terror.
3. Therefore I condemn left wing terror.

Please cut this out and keep it safe for reference if you are still confused LOL

Meanwhile as far as the right is concerned, you appear just be concerned about breaking windows - as if condemning that is good enough.

Brandon and Kamala both compared Trump to Hitler and said he was a threat to democracy. That’s all the proof I need.

Very weak. It appears things are 'proved' to you on a total lack of any real evidence, suggesting a bad case of confirmation bias.. Vance once made the same comparison. Why is that not also 'all the evidence you need'?

What JD Vance may or may not have said is irrelevant

That is just what the conspirators want you to think. He said it. He wants the top job. That's all the proof one needs... Hey, I have the hang of this now...

Both shooters were fooled and manipulated by Brandon and Kamala’s lies and conspiracy theories.

It seems here you accept the existence of such theories... when it is convenient.
you won’t condemn your friends for attempting to assassinate a US President.

I don't condemn dissident Republicans - or Martians either, come to that.
For crying out loud, I already condemned the window breaking, i did it over 3 years ago.

OK; fine with the window breaking which appears your only example of 'terror'. More seriously how about rejecting the terror of the mob threatening to hang Mike Pence and Nancy Pelosi during the Insurrection? Have you ever condemned all right wing terror on tis thread? You still haven't said specifically; just deflected , or remained silent. Not a good look. What was that you have said about being a coward?
a coward

Oh dear, again with the insulting.

reply

There is plenty of evidence. Kamala and Brandon frequently called him a threat to democracy and compared him to Hitler.

Then you should have no problem saying you condemn left wing terror. Why are you so afraid to?

It’s not weak at all, if you’re a crazed far left lunatic and you have a president and VP telling you that their opponent is the next Hitler you literally have no other choice than to try to take him out. Are you saying you wouldn’t have taken out Hitler had you had the chance?

I accept conspiracy theories when it’s convenient? What are you talking about?

You’re still too much of a chickenshit to condemn Brandon and Kamala for offering a hit on Trump, you are a coward;

And no one tried to hang Mike Pence, also it’s quite interesting that on J6 you people all of a sudden cared about his well being after actively wishing death on him for four years. J6 is a nonissue, Trump has turned the page, it’s time for you to get over it and I might take your phony moral outrage more seriously if you people gave a damn the over 500 previous times that BLM rioted instead of encouraging them to continue.

reply

There is plenty of evidence. Kamala and Brandon frequently called him a threat to democracy and compared him to Hitler.

And that's all you have? You are easily convinced aren't you? Just think of the similar type of inflammatory political rhetoric employed by Defendant Donald down the years. And, as already noted J D Vance also compared Trump to Hitler - so using you own rule of 'evidence' he must be part of the same conspiracy.

Then you should have no problem saying you condemn left wing terror. Why are you so afraid to?

Not read the helpful syllogism, just above eh? Where I said

3. Therefore I condemn left wing terror.

Now, do you condemn all right wing terror, not just 'broken windows'? Evasion will be noted.

t’s not weak at all, if you’re a crazed far left lunatic and you have a president and VP telling you that their opponent is the next Hitler you literally have no other choice than to try to take him out.

Still waiting for real evidence for this theory.

Are you saying you wouldn’t have taken out Hitler had you had the chance?

Ask JD Vance: why the delay?

I accept conspiracy theories when it’s convenient? What are you talking about?

Because it suits your world view to, and such things are a common right wing trope. I have read about them over and over here with just as much substantiation other than division, credulity, hate and bigotry.

You’re still too much of a chickenshit

Oh dear.

And no one tried to hang Mike Pence

I never said they did.

it’s quite interesting that on J6 you people all of a sudden cared about his well being after actively wishing death on him for four years


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/18/mike-pence-conservative-christian-conference-heckled
The third hearing on the attack on the Capitol revealed that the Proud Boys would have killed the Vice-President “if given the chance.” The horrific attack on Paul Pelosi was another wake-up call to Americans that the far-right conspiracy theories and hate speech fueled by MAGA extremists are putting lives at risk. It is interesting that you would not see this in the same light as Biden and Harris supposedly inciting an attack on Trump. The result here as we know was an attack on the Capitol, with meaningful threats on Pelosi and Pence, enough for the authorities to act when the Insurrection began.

it’s time for you to get over it

Yes, you do that, chickenshit...

reply

Trump has not engaged in any “inflammatory “ rhetoric. Yes he’s called out the left for their hatred for America but if that triggers you so badly then you’re the problem. Are you seriously telling me you wouldn’t have taken out Hitler had you had the chance? From the perspective of these two shooters thanks to Brandon and Kamala’s lies they had no choice.

So do you condemn left wing terror: yes or no? You’re not weasling your way out of this one. No one tried to “kill the vice president” like BlM tried to kill Trump during their summer of insurrections. You people have no moral authority when it comes to rioting. You people actively encouraged riot after riot after riot, Tim Walz’s psycho wife even said she enjoyed the smell of burning tires while Minneapolis burned to the ground. The only reason you threw such a hissy fit over the broken windows is because it would benefit you politically and would advance your lies and false narratives. If you truly cared about rioting you would have condemned BLM a long time ago like myself and the rest of the patriotic Americans.

Trump will be your president, there’s nothing you can do about it and you’re going to respect him and learn your place. Trump will take care of you just open your heart to him.

reply

Trump has not engaged in any “inflammatory “ rhetoric.


Trump has used incendiary political language, and insulting rhetoric. He specialises in “insult politics”, a certain campaign rhetoric that is centered not on criticism per se, but on ad hominem attacks of a disparaging nature aimed at an individual or group. For example we all remember how called John McCain a loser and denied he was a war hero. “Mitt Romney had his chance to beat a failed president but he choked like a dog,” the Republican nominee of 2016 wrote on Twitter about his predecessor. “Lightweight Marco Rubio was working hard last night. The problem is, he is a choker, and once a choker, always a choker! Mr. Meltdown,” he wrote about his primary challenger Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida).“Truly weird Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky reminds me of a spoiled brat without a properly functioning brain,” he wrote after the first debate about another of his primary challengers. And so on up to the present.

The editorial board of the New York Times explicitly cited the Republican nominee’s personal insults in an editorial titled “Why Donald Trump Should Not Be President.” The editorial listed the qualities of the Defendant Donald as “bluster, savage mockery of those who challenge him, degrading comments about women, mendacity, crude generalizations about nations and religions.” QED.

Are you seriously telling me you wouldn’t have taken out Hitler had you had the chance?

J D Vance is just biding his time.. I can wait...

So do you condemn left wing terror: yes or no?

Do you suffer from memory loss? This, from just above, the last time of quoting it back to you..
3. Therefore I condemn left wing terror.
Not much more I can say by way of being explicit on the subject is there?

Meanwhile, beyond the horrors of window breaking you have not explicitly condemned all terror generally or right wing terror specifically at all. Did you know there is a word for the practice of claiming to have higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case? Or, more precisely, asking of others that which you do not do yourself?

BlM tried to kill Trump during their summer of insurrections.

Oh dear.

The only reason you threw such a hissy fit over the broken windows


If I remember those broken windows are quite an obsession with you here...

If you truly cared about rioting you would have condemned BLM a long time ago like myself and the rest of the patriotic Americans.


Please see above, and where I have assisted your short term memory problem. It is also moonlighting.

Trump will be your president, there’s nothing you can do about it and you’re going to respect him and learn your place.Trump will take care of you just open your heart to him.


It is pseudo-religious sentiments like these that make me think you may be a troll, if a very good one lol. That can't be true.,, Can it?

reply

dang bra, you got pwned. I would just move on.

reply

I wouldn't put it that harshly, but he certainly needs to move on.

reply

3. Therefore I condemn left wing terror.

Ok, list those specific left wing terrors.

reply

I condemn all these:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_terrorism

Feel free to pic a specific example. I will condemn it in the way I do all terror.

Oh wait though; Wiki is just 'internet scriptures' right? So it is all fake news...

reply

Are you capable of thinking for yourself even for a few seconds? ... I didn’t ask you to cite or link to the internet’s version of left-wing terrorism.

All you had to do was give modern day examples of what YOU personally consider left-wing terrors.

Everything has to be spelled out for you knuckleheads.

reply

I didn’t ask you to cite or link to the internet’s version of left-wing terrorism. ..All you had to do was give modern day examples of what YOU personally consider left-wing terrors.


I condemn all terror. And with that I necessarily condemn all the examples left wing terrors I just linked to which, example by example, I consider terror. Just I do with

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_terrorism

What a stupid dispute this is lol - but telling

The problem with yourself, and others of your ilk, like KingBob, is that it appears difficult for you to understand the sincerity of someone who does the right thing even-handedly and does not pick a side to justify the worst of behaviour.

But perhaps you have an independent and objective link of such alleged terrorism you can direct me to, which Wiki does not cover? Oh, I forgot you don't do links, do you?

Your turn. Do you condemn all terror, as I do? Evasion will be noted.

reply

Your turn. Do you condemn all terror, as I do? Evasion will be noted.

But you never answered my question; instead, you cited propaganda and disinfo like a mindless shill.

Evasion and Deflection is well noted ... as usual.

reply

But you never answered my question


"I condemn all terror. And with that I necessarily condemn all the examples of left wing terrors I just linked to which, example by example, I consider terror."

Stop moonlighting and answer my question. Why the reluctance?

reply

That’s not what I asked, I didn’t ask you about “all terror”, I asked you to condemn left wing terror without deflecting to other examples.

Man up and answer the question you coward.

reply

How is all this gaslighting working out for you and now it seems tv as well? Are you feeling big and clever?

reply

So you’re still too much of a coward to directly condemn left wing terror. That speaks volumes about your lack of character and morals.

reply

The ad nauseum fallacy still panning out? Not worried about diminishing returns? Good.

reply

Nope, just accurately calling you out. Dont like it? Go cry to someone who cares.

reply

Short term memory loss? Or troubled about not comprehending common phrases like "Therefore I condemn left wing terror"? Don't worry; we can work on that together next time. I will be glad to help. Until then, just one more predictable reply here and you're all done...

reply

Then you should have no problem stating “I condemn left wing terror”. You never directly said that. Why are you so afraid?

reply

He's not allowed to answer from a personal POV.

He’s only allowed to respond with propaganda.

reply

He’s a complete and utter joke. He needs to man up, admit that we won, he lost and unite around President Trump. Right now he’s being a crybaby loser insurrectionist and I don’t respect it. I hope he gets over the savage beating Kamala took and himself quickly.

Do you happen to know any good therapists I could recommend to him?

reply

FlimFlam is a Euro from the UK regime, he’s not American.

He’s a propagandist gaslighting clown meddling in our politics.

reply

Geez sounds a lot like skavou (or whatever his name is)

reply

It’s a skavau clone.

reply

Oh dear ...

reply

If that’s what you call hateful language then you need to toughen up. The left called Trump Hitler and a threat to democracy, tried to jail him and murder him. Get over it.

As for your comment about JD Vance you are spewing a bunch of lies and conspiracy theories. JD Vance is a patriotic American who is standing behind his president and there is not one shred of evidence he ever called Trump “Hitler”, we have hearsay from someone who said they heard him say that. Even judge Judy doesn’t accept hearsay.

I need to hear it: I, flimflaneur condemn left wing terror. No deflecting to the right, that’s a very cowardly approach.

There was no right wing terror on J6, just a couple of idiots who broke windows, most of the crowd was given a free tour of the capitol by capitol police, something Pelosi conveniently didn’t want us to know about. J6 is a dead issue, and if you cared about the horrors of rioting you would have said something during the summer of BLM carnage when over 500 violent riots all incited by the far left occurred which caused billions of dollar in damage, thousands of cops in the hospital, courthouses, police stations burned the ground, dozens dead, etc.

BLM did tried to murder Trump, Trump had to go into protection, a violent mob of BLM terrorists tried to storm the White House.

Your the only one obsessing over broken windows, we had two year of a failed far left witch hunt committee, packed with Trump haters over the broken windows.

reply

The left called Trump Hitler and a threat to democracy

The left and JD Vance called Trump Hitler and a threat to democracy. There, corrected it for you,
The left ... tried to murder him

Remember what I said about conspiracy theories and evidence? I do.
there is not one shred of evidence he ever called Trump “Hitler”,

Oh dear. "I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical asshole like Nixon who wouldn't be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he's America's Hitler," he wrote privately to an associate on Facebook in 2016. Significantly, when his Hitler comment was first reported, in 2022, a spokesperson did not dispute it. QED
I need to hear it: I, flimflaneur condemn left wing terror.

Easy. Just check back to where I have said that very thing explicitly - and helpfully repeated it for your twice or more. Moonlighting noted.

Oddly, I still don't remember you condemning right wing terror, or all terror, even once. Funny that.

There was no right wing terror on J6, just a couple of idiots who broke windows, most of the crowd was given a free tour of the capitol by capitol police...

LOL!! Your best one yet. Unfortunately for you, as mentioned before, I actually watched the live feed while the seriousness of the prosecutions which followed tell a different story.
you would have said something during the summer of BLM carnage

And especially given that I condemn all terror, you know for sure that I didn't?

Your the only one obsessing over broken windows

On the contrary it is you who mentions it all the time, as it is your only example of right wing madness you find it in you to condemn. QED

That's it from me, for reasons explained already a couple of message back.

PS you forgot to gratuitously insult me this time. Are you feeling OK?

reply

See there you go again, refusing to condemn far left hate without pathetically trying to inject the right into it. There is no legitimate evidence JD Vance ever compared Trump to Hitler, we have a witness who says he heard JD Vance say it, that’s literally hearsay which isn’t even accepted by Judge Judy.

The left did try to murder him and Kamala and Brandon have blood on their hands.

That quote you posted even if I accept that it’s legitimate does not establish a comparison between Trump and Hitler, unlike Brandon and Kamala who literally called him a threat to democracy and compared him to Hitler. Also when JD Vance allegedly called Trump Hitler it was over a decade ago. Are you trying to suggest that the shooter heard a rumor that JD Vance (who was relatively unknown at the time) had called Trump Hitler and then he said “Hitler is about to rise again I need to stop him” and then waited over a decade to do anything about? That’s moronic even by far left conspiracy theory standards.

You said “I condemn all terror”, I didn’t ask you about other forms of terror you idiot. I specifically asked you about far left terror. Why are you so afraid to condemn far left terror?

The footage that Pelosi hid from us paints a completely different picture. The crowd was largely peaceful and were not told to stop by Capitol Police. Get over the broken windows, it’s not a big deal, Trump has turned the page it’s time for you to also.

You frequently brought up the broken windows, whenever I talk about it I’m just responding to you you idiot.

You don’t matter anymore, you’re nothing more than a crybaby snowflake liberal. Go back to your cry room.

reply

Also you never answered my question: If I turned into a black person tomorrow what “systemic racism” would I experience and how do you know?

reply

Please see the link provided for the examples, supplied further to your request. As for knowing when racism has occurred, the legal position in the UK at least) is racism is often an incident/crime which is perceived by the victim or any other person to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person's race or perceived race. In the case of systemic racism, which is more pernicious despite laws to the contrary this is how it is perceived.

Thank you for playing,

reply

I didn’t ask you for a link, I asked you to explain how I would be subjected to racism should I wake up tomorrow and I turned into a black person. Give me specific examples, what laws on the books would hurt me because of my skin color? If you can’t then you can’t claim that systemic racism even exists.

reply

I asked you to explain how I would be subjected to racism should I wake up tomorrow and I turned into a black person. Give me specific examples,


*sigh* off the top of my head discrimination in the workplace, with housing, in the legal system, cultural stereotyping.. use the top of your own head for more examples. And, er, you are the one who said earlier that "I am not saying racism does not exist".. Right?

Goodbye.

reply

What discrimination in my workplace would I experience and how would you know that it’s racially motivated? You don’t even know where I work.

What mortgage companies are denying loans to black people and how do you know it’s racial motivated?

What laws are set up to discriminate against black people and how do you know they are racial motivated?

What cultural stereotypes?

I asked you to tell me how this would impact me specifically. You didn’t answer you coward.

reply

That certainly shut him up.

reply

Yeah, these precious little snowflakes like filmflaneur have never been told no, they have never been intellectually challenged and have always lived very sheltered and privileged lives, so when they get out into the real world and someone actually holds their feet to the fire they have a meltdown.

reply

"You’re arguing against things I never said."

I can confirm that, FF does that frequently.

reply

advance training? we do this on tuesdays.

reply

I am glad for you, hope it works out.

reply

🍆💦😍

reply

Democrats not respecting democracy
posted 14 hours ago by KingBob (2278)
6 replies | jump to latest
https://www.newsweek.com/list-democrats-skipping-donald-trumps-inauguration-2001234

What is wrong with them? Why can’t they just admit that Trump won fair and square and that it’s time to unite and rally behind their president? I thought they were the ones who thought you should respect democracy or does that door only swing one way? This also sounds dangerously close to insurrectionist behavior."

This rule only works if the Democrats won the election. The Democrats Motto is "Do as I say, not as I do"

reply

Why can’t they just admit that Trump won fair and square and that it’s time to unite and rally behind their president?


You mean like Trump and his supporters did last time? Oh yes, that was different, right?

reply

Actually, yeah, it was different because we had an election where NBC tells it's viewers that they're stopping the ballot count at 11:50PM and would pick it up in the morning on The TODAY SHOW and when morning came 8 hours later, Trump who was ahead by miles is all of a sudden losing by a landslide and statistically and mathematically, this was impossible. It should also be of note that I've voted in every Presidential Election at almost 59 as far back as I can remember and they've never had an election where the ballot count was stopped like that until 2020 and there was always a winner decided THAT NIGHT!! In the end, the fix was in and really doesn't matter anymore because I feel like it took America 4 Years to finally see this and have regretted the last 4 years with Biden which is why Trump won so soundly like he did

reply

I dont know how to tell you this but ... NBC wernt doing the counting .

"I turned the TV off and when I came back the numbers were different" is by a country mile the stupidest "proof" of 2020 rigging I have ever heard , and as we all know theres some pretty stiff competition for the title of "dumbest Trumper proof of 2020 was rigged" , mainly lead by Mike The Pillow.

So yeah the fact remains
Democrats admit Trump won fait and square in 2024
Republicans refused to accept a democratic vote in 2020 and tried to keep Trump in power by force.


IF mathematically, this was impossible was true then cheating would be proven! and recounts and stuff! clearly its not true because that didnt happen.

reply

Democrats cried about the 2016 Election being stolen for four years and were embarrassed in their attempt to "prove it" then released bat herpes and set up a Reichstag Fire event to steal power and install their puppet that would take the blame for when they inevitably turned the country to shit and everybody knows it including you

reply

lol,

I love this post!

well done sir...

reply

Look Gen Z, I couldn't give 2 fucks what your sorry liberal ass has to say about it. I'm telling you as someone who's a fucking lifetime older than you, the ballot count for any election in the past excluding 2020 was never ever stopped, not for any reason, so please just fuck off and take your TDS elsewhere

reply

Democrats don't give a shit about "muh democracy". All they care about it winning.

reply

Exactly, they never gave a good damn about democracy, it was just a catch phrase they used to advance their radical agenda and try to hurt Donald Trump (didn’t do them a lot of good).

They are a bunch of sore loser crybabies and they need to get over it. They need to put their big boy and big girl pants on, show up at the inauguration, accept their place as the losers they are and cheer on their President because when he succeeds America succeeds.

reply

Well I didn't respect Joe Biden's win in 2020. If all you are doing is staying home then I don't really care.

reply

To them democracy (which the US isn't) is their leftist ideas.

reply

> Why can’t they just admit that Trump won fair and square and that it’s time to unite and rally behind their president?

Trump's behind stinks too much to "rally behind", not to mention there are too many losers like you trying to sniff.

reply

Sounds like sour grapes to me. You’re just a sad, bitter snowflake liberal terrorist who needs Mommy to hold him and tell him everything is going to be alright (which it is). Get over yourself and respect your president.

reply

At the end of all this Trump BS nothing will be gained by you or anyone else. You're not bright enough to see that, and you would not care because your troll-program is for shit-flooding. IGNORE

reply

Naw, his first term was great and there’s nothing to suggest his second term won’t be any different. The truth is after the unmitigated disaster of Brandon and Kamala people like you have no moral authority nor should you be criticizing anyone. You people were the ones who ran the country into the ditch, the least you could do is shut up and get out of the way while the mature adults try to pull it out. Learn your place which is in the backseat.

reply