There must be irrefutable and unequivocal proof that losing the election has caused “direct personal harm” … if that can’t be proven than you have “no standing” and any receipts provided will be rejected and dismissed.
Don’t forget that most of Trump’s lawsuit cases were dismissed due to “lack of standing” because the plaintiffs couldn't prove they were directly harmed by the alleged fraud even when they had a mountain of receipts demonstrating statistical impossible irregularities.
But hey, if they want to open the recount “can of worms”, than they should be prepared for the official investigation of the 2020 election.
reply
share
WhoToTrust (1130)
3 months ago
And don't forget, trumps lawsuits ONLY ever provided "We have lots of theories. We just don't have any evidence" bitter, bonkers, bull$#!+ type "evidence".; )
The current right wing = False Equivalencies R'Us.
reply
share
tvfan (14545)
3 months ago
They had plenty of evidence, but the judges refused to accept the evidence because Trump/Plaintiffs couldn't prove how they were personally and directly harmed (lack of standing) .... which is almost impossible to prove in any court.
reply
share