MovieChat Forums > Politics > John Kerry opines against freedom of exp...

John Kerry opines against freedom of expression

posted 2 months ago by maixiu (2220)
5 replies | jump to latest

Kerry is the latest of the post-national globalist elites in America to rue the legal protections we have for free expression. This is starting to snowball very quickly throughout the west.

It's one thing to have posters here on this board who are very much thrilled by the notion of cracking down on humans being able to hold thoughts or express themselves in a manner that offends The Message. But when rapacious, villainous scumbags like Kerry, who are just about able to actually do something about freedom of expression, feel comfortable to publicly announce that there needs to be repercussions for deviating from Regime morality, things are getting dark.

https://x.com/SwipeWright/status/1840231811554664541?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1840231811554664541%7Ctwgr%5E85fbbcbed4202fc732d67cd911a38e4f7b6a4de1%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Fjohn-kerry-says-quiet-part-out-loud-first-amendment-stands-major-block-govern

[–] filmflaneur (1141) 2 months ago

Not to worry, if Defendant Donald gets in, he has promised to 'terminate' parts of the constitution, so it might include this bit.

[–] maixiu (2220) 2 months ago

And here we go, example #1 of a poster here who sniffs at the idea of the public being able to express thoughts that don't comport with the established morality of the ruling class.

[–] filmflaneur (1141) 2 months ago

A Strawman, as well as a diversion.. but thank you anyway.

[–] MexicanStandup (294) 2 months ago

He hasn't promised anything like that, that's just something that Joe Biden's 49 million voters from 2020 say,

in order to fill up another boring day of their lives.

[–] filmflaneur (1141) 2 months ago

In the post on X, Mr Trump referred to vague allegations of "massive & widespread fraud and deception" and asked whether he should be immediately returned to power. "A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great 'Founders' did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!" he said.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63851751

The trouble is, if one part of the Constitution proves troublesome, then why not all of it?

Another straw in the wind:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-us-consitution-legal-b2428941.html