That's not normal. Other countries don't have this problem.
Trumpites/Republicans = Gun nuts
Gun nuts = Lax gun laws
No reason for civilians to have dangerous lethal military weapons on American streets and schools.
Aka Keelai whines that schools don't have better methods for detecting guns as a proxy for banning all gun ownership.
shareNonsense! Harris and her husband are gun owners. Common sense gun laws, which most Americans support, are needed,
shareMore lies. Owning a firearm does not excuse the desire to ban them. Any of them.
"Common sense gun laws", that is a marketing slogan used by the left to deceive uninformed voters.
None of the bullshit democrats push for will have any positive effect on crime. Let alone any effect that would outweigh usurping the Constitution.
You're not an American so fuck off.
Most Americans support common sense gun laws. There is a reason why gun-related deaths are much higher in your red states.
You have never read the Constitution. You're not a Well-Regulated Militia.
No they don't. "Common sense gun laws" is just another democrat campaign slogan with no meaning.
I have absolutely read the Constitution. I know what a well-regulated militia is and I am part of it. I also know what "shall not be infringed" means.
The red state comment is just another lie, Keeliar.
Keelai is for some reason psychotically obsessed with the concept of blaming guns for existing in the first place as the problem, and is fighting a losing battle for trying to get rid of them.
shareWhy do you support killing schoolchildren with military-style weapons?
shareWhat's a "military style weapon" and how is that relevant?
Why do you support not guarding schools the way we guard banks? We want to guard them, you want them to be soft targets.
Why do you assume I support killing school children with guns? Of course it's a problem, but there isn't going to be a big fix for it anytime soon. You are way too obsessed with this, and definitely must have had a very traumatic event happen to you to become this psychotic about it. No wonder you jump to conclusions immediately without any evidence.
shareThe schools are too busy allowing trannies and paedos exposing themselves to kids to let guns get in the way.
shareLaw enforcement and the military are the only ones that should have access to automatic weapons.
shareThats not the American way. We are living in America. And you have NO right to take our existing rights away.
shareYou're not a militia.
shareDon’t need to be a modern day militia. That’s been explained a million times as well.
And if you think the Founding Fathers plan was to disarm the civilian population….i want some of what you’re smoking cause I guarantee that’s some good shit.
The 2nd amendment is in reference to a well-organized militia only.
shareWrong. Armed and skilled American citizens are the militia. Which YOU are not. If the time came, you would not heed the call. You're just a sheep that would beg to be protected. By. Men. With. Rifles.
What does, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" mean?
Thinking that taking guns away is going to stop gun crime is like taking Keelai's keyboard away will stop her racism. Ain't gonna work.
sharePrivate militias are illegal in the U.S.. Only state-run militias like the national guard are legal. If you can find a statute stating otherwise, please link.
The 2nd amendment is referring to state government.
Some history:
The Founding Fathers feared a federal leader becoming a dictator or monarchy. Remember they had recently fought a war to free themselves from a monarchy, therefore their main concern was to avoid another. They didn't want a national leader outlawing the states from having their own military and occupying the states with a federal military like King George did in the colonies with his redcoats.
"A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..."
In plain English, each state can protect itself from a dictator by maintaining its own state's military (well-regulated = state-run)
“...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms...”
People is referring to the collective whole. In other words, state government. Arms is not guns, but all war weapons including cannons, bombs, etc. "Keep and bear" is to have and carry. In plain English, state government has a right to have and carry military weaponry to keep itself free from a potential dictator.
"... shall not be infringed."
"Infringed" signifies collectively or a public right. Again, state government.
If they meant individual or a private right, then they would have used the term "abridged" like they did in the 1st amendment when referring to individual's right to freedom of speech..
Infringed and abridged are not interchangeable.
The Constitution is a legal document. Terminology is everything which is the reason the Constitution should be read as a whole, in context and with an understanding of history at that time.
You are literally too retarded to argue with.
shareRight, we should ensure that all of our rights are subject to the whims of the oligarchs who run the country. All they do now is rant and rave about the fact that we still have freedom of thought and expression. Once they get the whip hand with regard to firearms, you'll be stripped of that right faster than you can say Jack Robinson.
shareBetter emigrate to Jordan or Palestine where the kids have a higher survival rate than the USA under the democrats.
shareMore tortured statistics from the left. "Exposed to gun violence", what on earth does that even mean? It means the people who put together these numbers had a goal in mind and did whatever they could to come up with the biggest number possible. Does it mean they watched Lethal Weapon III during study hall?
shareStatistics are real. It means you can't tolerate reality and you're a gun nut who supports schoolkiddies being shot to death in schools.
shareOther countries call on us when they get invaded by a fascist dictator.
No military in the world uses semi-automatic rifles like the AR15. Another neo-liberal fascist lie.
A tiny percentage of crime is committed with so-called "assault weapons". The most popular rifle in the US is the AR15. Two inconvenient facts that utterly destroy your argument for anyone with half a brain.
A gun nut supports schoolchildren being shot in school by another gun nut with assault rifles.
Didn't you cry endlessly when your cult leader was shot by a gun nut Trump voterwith an assault rifle and suffered a tiny ear booboo?
Says the yellow-bellied cunt that would be a puddle on the floor if a bullet ever flew in its direction.
Sorry but an AR15 is not an assault rifle. You're ignorant.
I've had guns pointed at me. It never made me want to ban them. You're stupid.
Both federal and state legislation define an AR-15 as an assault weapon.
shareAssault rifle - an actual term with a real meaning. No rifles available to civilians are assault rifles.
Assault weapon - a made-up political term with no real meaning.
Two different things and not interchangeable, idiot.
You should be worried more about things like economy and inflation than gun mishaps. I guess your obsession with destroying every single firearm in the world over other policies comes from a traumatic experience with a gun in your life.
shareThe economy is great! Soft landing from Trump's recession which destroyed the economy with record unemployment and bankruptcies. Inflation is way down which is the reason that the Fed chairman lowered interest rates this week. You need to find a j.o.b. instead of SSI.
Only a gun nut is ok with schoolchildren being slaughtered in schools by other gun nuts.
"No reason for civilians to have dangerous lethal military weapons"
There is a plethora of reasons. And I'm pretty sure we are sick and tired of repeating ourselves to the exact same people. If you are that fucking deaf, get your hearing checked.
Addendum : They are semi-auto, not fully auto. Which makes them usless in military use. But you already know that becuase youve been told many, many, many times.
Nonsense! The carnage and physical damage done are both similar to war-related damage. You're a gun nut who hates children which is the reason you want them to be shot in school.
shareWhich is even greater with your average deer rifle. Yes, bullets cause tissue damage, that's kinda the point. When your idiotic "assault weapons" ban doesn't work, you'll go after other firearm types. One by one until we're completely disarmed and at the mercy of common criminals and wannabe tyrants like you. Not gonna happen. Do you realize that the Constitution provides for us to shoot people who try to disarm us? Are you that dense?
shareDon't listen to Keelai. They are completely psychotic over this concept of blaming the pure existence of guns instead of the people or their choices. It's no different from using a knife and killing in a stealthy Metal Gear Solid way.
share