MovieChat Forums > Politics > Enabling Act of 1933 + Project 2025

Enabling Act of 1933 + Project 2025


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_Act_of_1933

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025


Pretty much what the Cons are setting up for. You only have to listen to what they spout. This election is pretty much a make or break for Libs or Cons. Both sides repeat that whoever wins, country will be no more/over/ruined for good. Maybe I will get to see some Civil War stuff start going, the world will rejoice. Ah empires, they never last long, do they?


“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross.”
-Sinclair Lewis

reply

With the Supreme Court ending the Ceveron Doctrine that's a huge part of Project 2025 and Trump's desire to gut the Deep State. Unelected Burecrats responsible for endless regulations and government waste.

reply

Overturning the Chevron Doctrine is one of their biggest decisions; I’m surprised that no one has created a post about it.

reply

I don't know the whole context of what it means but it's tied to this idea of Project 2025 and firing the many unelected bureaucrats who think they are above the law.

reply

Agencies and corporations hijacked the system that created and interpreted the laws.

For the past four decades, agencies and corporations have been able to "interpret" laws to mean whatever they want, and the courts had to go along with it. No law gave them that authority; they just made them up and fabricated their own rules.

This basically placed bureaucrats in charge of our country. This was unconstitutional and caused harm to everyone.

No government organization was ever authorized to create laws, they were to provide expertise and recommend policies but only Congress representing "we the people", has the authority to make the laws.

It means that agencies and corporations will no longer be independent of law interpretation and will have to answer to Congress.

It means that federal courts may not defer to an agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute.

It means agencies cannot make or modify a Congress law, without Congress approval.

It means that administrative agencies may no longer interpret the law in order to create their own rules, but will require everything to go through the courts as it should be.

It puts decision making back to the courts, to interpret the law, rather than the agencies.

It doesn’t get rid of all regulations, but it does put it back into the hands of the judicial branch where it belongs.

It means that we the people can sue and challenge a ruling.

It means that we the people can contest their overreach and make a case to the courts.

Eventually, this decision will also rollback and/or downsize several agencies.

In summary, this is taking away the power of administrative agencies.

This is a big step towards “draining the swamp.”

reply