Would this be considered self-defense?
https://x.com/TPostMillennial/status/1798355447147307293
BEFORE LOOKING AT THE COMMENTS, what do you think?
No, not self defense. You can't shoot someone multiples times for taking a swing at you and the guy had no weapon. Had the other guy been armed it would be a different story. Once the other person is no longer a threat you cant continue shooting.
shareI thought the whole point of the castle-defense was if you feel your life was threatened you can just shoot away with glee.
shareYou dont even know the law? Are you american?
shareI don’t think this happened in America. I believe it happened in Costa Rica. Who knows what the law is there but it does not look to me that deadly force was reasonably required. What I find interesting is how the two wives really initiated and escalated the physical confrontation of the men.
shareDoes the castle doctrine even exist outside the U.S.? He brought it up thats why I asked if he was american.
shareUnderstood. What’d you think of the two women gesticulating wildly and appearing to scream and get the husbands’ blood boiling? I see videos like this from time to time where the women have presumed they are immune from the violence and get the men to fight. Now one husband will likely be in prison and the other is in the ground
shareSorry but that's not how it works.
All the castle doctrine does is eliminate the "duty to retreat". Contrary to retarded democrat rhetoric, it is not a license to kill.
I felt glee watching the thug being blown away.
shareI think it is self defense because a thug being killed is not as bad as his victim getting a bloody nose.
share