CNN mod: Some of his rivals who are running against him are saying that he shouldn't be tried at all just because he is a former president and just because he is a candidate.
Bolton: I think that disqualifies those people from being president, and I think I would say the same for any of them who think he should be pardoned.
Ya'll really want to start traversing this road...huh? Prepare for O'Bama and Clintons' indictments as soon as Republicans take back anything.
________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Weakness.
Indictments of Clinton and Obama - for what?
shareEasy... Clinton for the destruction of the email server, and O'Bama for drone striking civilians.
Since the democrats have made the rules that all indictments are now for pretty much anything...the gloves are off, motherfuckers.
________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Weakness.
Her use of her email server was investigated thoroughly by the FBI and the Republican director said there was nothing to charge her for.
Trump killed thousands of civilians in Afghanistan and Yemen, do you want to charge him for that, also?
She can still be indicted as Comey admitted she was guilty. No one is above the law right!? RIGHT!?
Afghanistan went on for 20 years....looks like we can add O'Bama and Bush to that!!!
Seriously, we don't want to go down this road.
________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Weakness.
Comet went one better - he broke with long time DoJ policy and announced that Hillary was still under investigating, shortly before the election, resulting in the collapse of her polling advantage and Trump's razor thin win despite losing the popular vote. There was no need to prosecute Clinton, he destroyed her political career.
shareHer use of her email server was investigated thoroughly by the FBI and the Republican director said there was nothing to charge her for.
Trump killed thousands of civilians in Afghanistan and Yemen
Why does it matter if he started the war or not?
shareWhy does it matter if he started the war or not?
Hey, I'm just playing your game of sayng a president should be indicted for civilian deaths at the hands of our military.
shareHe didn't start the war, as a matter of fact, he was ending it.
shareWhat was he doing when he illegally handled top secret documents?
shareI guess you admit he is guilty and needs to rely on jury nulification
shareFor bogus charges? He is protected by the PRA.
shareExplain how the PRA protects him, since it states that his records do not belong to him when he leaves office.
shareWhat about Trump going out of his way NOT to end the Yemen War by vetoing the bipartisan defunding bill? Also, we came within a hair's breath of going to war with Iran in 2019 after Trump pulled out of the nuclear accord and Suleimani started monkeying around with oil tankers and Iraqi Shiite militias. Obama didn't start all of the drone wars that continued under his presidency either. He compounded the problem and maybe added a few more, sure. In other words, a snowball in hell's chances of any of them being held to account.
shareHe had negotiated an agreement to withdraw all U.S. forces by May 1 of 2021; or did you intentionally forget that part?
shareAs soon as Republicans take back anything? GOP had the House 2011-2018, and Trump 2017-2020.
And if you're going with ClintonS' indictments, GOP had House 1995-2006 and Littleboots 2001-2008... (IIRC they also had the Senate 1995-2000, and again 2003-2006.)
That was before democrats changed the rules. There are no rules. Gloves are off.
shareNoone changed any rules. Committees always had subpoena powers. Especially when one chamber's majority party is different from the other chamber's. Nothing to do but investigate.
shareBullshit. This would've never happened before Trump. Trump could have easily pushed for an investigation into Obama/Biden/Clinton administration but he didn't. Now there's nothing holding us back from holding your sick heroes accountable.
share"This would've never happened before Trump."
My recollection is hazy and maybe I'm wrong and I'm not looking it up, but Sandy Berger(sp?) was in Clinton's administration and he got popped for smuggling classified documents in his underpants out of somewhere when he shouldn't have. Hannity, O'Reilly, et al bleated about that for years. Granted, he wasn't the PRESIDENT.
Was there a prior incident where the FBI or someone else told a former President that said President had classified documents and asked for them back, and said President replied "Fuck you!"?
We're gonna ballot harvest your asses into oblivion.
________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Weakness.
It will never happen. They scream and complain but it's all kabuki theater for us to think they're doing something as the most anyone's gotten is a slap on the wrist.
shareBolton needs to wake the fuck up. The dems are using their government positions as tools of oppression.
shareSo you think tRump hasn't been reckless with national security documents?
shareI think that the way the Left has used government law enforcement agencies to target their enemies is the worse abuse of government power and violations of human rights I have seen in this country in my entire life.
shareYou didn't answer Thiasticker' question.
shareBut I did. IMO, the investigtion is politically motivated and thus unjust and a violation of Trump's civil rights.
The specific excuse that hte lefties are using for this particular attempt at jailing their political enemy, is irrelevant.
You don't think he was reckless with national security documents? All he had to do was comply with requests to return the documents. He refused, his them and lied about having them. These things are not in dispute, Trump publicly admits them every day. If it's true then it's not politically motivated, is it?
shareCorbell has "hear no evil, see no evil" tattooed on his brain. Also he's an acolyte of the Nixon mantra "If the President does it, it's not illegal." But he's going to be crying into his Modelo when the trial comes around. Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure the cowardly loin is going to agree to a plea deal before he tries to peddle his lies under oath.
shareYes, it still is politically motivated.
He would still be a political prisoner. Even if Joe Biden was in a cell right next to him, which btw, WON'T happen.
Either he committed crimes or he didn't. You have a political motivation to not prosecute him. The law had a motivation to uphold the law.
share"The law"? Hilarious. Your pretense that you give a damn about hte law, is a joke.
NOte, you didn't comment on the FACT that Biden will get a pass. And while we are at it, let's remember that HILLARY got a pass too.
Two different standards of "Justice", one for dems, one for the enemies of the dems.
That's not Freedom. That's Oppression. That makes the attempt to jail him, OPPRESSION. And a violation of his rights. And the rights of his supporters.
Hillary was investigated and the Republicans in charge found there was nothing to charge her with.
There is currently an investigation into Biden. Let's hold judgement until it is completed.
Hillary got a pass from teh fbi, because a dem partisan inside the fbi altered the final report. And no one said shit about it.
And Biden will get a pass too. Don't pretend like you were born yesterday.
Trump goes to jail while Hillary and Biden walk for the same shit?
That's not justice, that's jailing your political enemies. Doesn't matter if your excuse sounds good and all the legal formalities are followed.
It's still a complete violation of his rights and the rights all of his supporters.
It's not at all the same shit. If Trump had turned over what he had (like Biden) instead of lying about it and hiding it he wouldn't have been indicted. In fact he was not indicted for the documents he did return, even though he (as well as Biden) shouldn't have had them.
Hillary? What documents did she have that she shouldn't have had?
You are trying to ignore hte forest for the trees. Hillary got a pass for being violating classification security and so will Biden.
Trump on the other hand, is in real danger of going to jail, NOT because of the crime he committed, but because the dems want to see the opposition leader in jail.
No
It’s because of the crimes he committed and don’t worry you’re not getting indicted also like the grifting madman sats
If that was true, then hillary would be sitting in jail right now, for the same crimes and we would be discussing what would happen WHEN, not if, Biden goes to jail too.
Intead Hillary got a pass, and we both/all know that BIden will too.
Trump's real problem is not the documents, but the desire of lefties to use their power to achive their polititcal goals, no matter the means.
Allow me to fix that for you:
Hillary was investigated and the RINOs in charge found there was nothing to charge her with.
No true Scotsman fallacy
share17000+ incriminating and deleted emails say otherwise.
https://pastes.io/5vegbfkqha
Weren't Jim Jordan, Trey Gowdy, and Pompeo all on the Benghazi committee that spent millions to turn up fuck all?
This is just hypocrisy at it's finest. MAGA idiots are on here claiming that St Trump is a victim of some political witch hunt, while at the same time lamenting that the investigations against Hillary weren't political enough. You can't make this shit up.
LOL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVHBmEIkrAk
________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Weakness.
Yeap, I saw it in another source earlier today. The whole thing was a lie thanks to Jack Smith and the DOJ via CNN.
They conveniently used a clip of the full audio to deceive the public.
https://pastes.io/q6zilg5e9j
arrest Biden
shareWhy would Jack Smith want to taint the jury pool? A leak by Trump allies would be the ideal way to taint the jury pool. His lawyers can ask if potential jurors had heard the audio tape and exclude them if they had. Since I'm sure it isn't playing on Fox but I know it is being played on MSNBC and other liberal sources, that helps enrich the jury with Trumptards.
shareThe audio was a clip that had nothing to do with the indictment/charges.
Jack and the DOJ released it to "Fake News" for the brainwashed and gullible.
https://pastes.io/q6zilg5e9j
Some of the main questions are: Who is currently legally trying trump? And, who is trump running against?...because in the minds of many republican/maga politicians and continuing trump supporters, trump won in 2020, is still president, and is therefore still running everything in the White House and the government.
So if trump is still running everything, is he trying to prosecute and put himself in prison? If he and his supporters are constantly claiming that everything Biden is doing is wrong, wouldn't all of that really be trumps' fault because he's the person who is REALLY in control? ; )