Tucker: Why don't they want this war to end?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMOhZnCJK7k
This will be impossible for the pro war, Biden Dummycraps to defend or show how wrong he is when everything shared here is the truth.
If we let Putin do whatever he wants in the Ukraine... the war will just end? He won't want to continue fulfilling his destiny of bringing back the soviet union? Why do I find that so hard to believe? Hmm oh yeah because we let him do what he wanted in Crimea. Look where that got us.
shareAnd isn't life better for those in Crimea than in the corrupt, non democracy Ukraine right now?
It would be better to let him do what he wants with the least amount of bloodshed.
And if life is harder under him then not, why care?
That would not be our problem.
The US just hates competition when it comes to world power and dominating.
Why do you like Dictator KGB Putin so much? Are you a commie?
shareNot that I like him just that I don't know enough about him to think of him in negative terms.
I have not bothered to look up and see what makes him so terrible.
All I know is that he is the president of Russia who was provoked into this defensive move on Ukraine.
And if Russia wants to overtake other countries I would much rather see it with the least number of civilian casualties.
Wouldn't you want to see that too?
You have a Russian username because you are loyal to Russia and Putin. You hate the U.S..
>All I know is that he is the president of Russia who was provoked into this defensive move on Ukraine.
You describe Putin as if he has a single braincell. "Provoked" into burning through potentially 100k of his own people and advancing, currently, at the pace of WW1 advances.
>And if Russia wants to overtake other countries I would much rather see it with the least number of civilian casualties.
Is this satire?
Is this satire?
I am a pro peace, anti war dove, pacifist conscience objector so much that I did not register for Selective Service.
You want war and the blood shed of civilians?
Fuck that.
>You want war and the blood shed of civilians?
Should the Uk have just surrendered to the Nazis in 1940?
Sure.
Why not?
I wasn't around then and I don't care.
It would have been their problem anyways.
It would've have very likely caused potential Nazi hegemony in Europe. Free to ignore their western front, the Nazis could've turned full attention to the USSR earlier. The USSR may well have been overrun in this scenario.
You think surrender and abdication makes for a better world here?
If Putin decides that the Baltics should be annexed, should we just let him do it to avoid a war?
shareTry as you might you will never, ever get me to agree that war is ever a good thing.
Not when it ends up killing civilians.
Oh.
Excuse me.
Let me talk your uncaring, non compassion language.
I mean, collateral damage.
There.
Is that better?
Just put the two opposing leaders in a room and let them duel or duke it out if they cannot agree to peaceful terms.
I would be all for that.
You did not answer my question. If Putin decided that the Baltics should be annexed, should the west just let them?
>Just put the two opposing leaders in a room and let them duel or duke it out if they cannot agree to peaceful terms.
Not an option. The real world option is that some states invade other states from time to time. What should happen when that happens? Should the weaker state just roll over and let them do whatever they want every time?
>And isn't life better for those in Crimea than in the corrupt, non democracy Ukraine right now?
You think Ukraine is less democratic and more corrupt than Russia?
>It would be better to let him do what he wants with the least amount of bloodshed.
Okay, so if Putin decides to invade the Baltics - should we just let him annex them?
>And if life is harder under him then not, why care?
This must be the leftist international solidarity and credentials I hear so much about.